Tax Treatment on Interests

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Yson, 12th Jan, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Yson

    Yson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    361
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi i was supposed to settle an IP house today but it was broken into and all flooded, as because i was using a loan (from other property) that i had to pay for the house, the cash is sitting in legal trust account, and the loan is billing me interests, is this tax deducitable if it is settled let say in 2 months, what is the treatment during this 2 month.
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    I would think this is a capital cost as it doesn't relate to income if the property is not available for rent.
     
  3. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,555
    Location:
    Sydney
    If the property is intended to be rented when settled Steele's case principles may well apply and allow a deduction for the interim period.
     
    Terry_w and Ross Forrester like this.
  4. Yson

    Yson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    361
    Location:
    Sydney
    Even thought legally speaking, i am not the owner of the house yet?
     
  5. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    So you have put the full purchase amount in the solicitor's trust account in anticipation of settlement and then couldn't settle?
     
  6. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    asked the ntaa on that one as the trust account added a nice little twist.

    they advised that as the funds have been put to use to put into the solicitors trust account the nexus between an income producing use and the use of the funds is too far removed based on Steele's case . as the funds are being held on trust then the interest would not be deductible between the contract date and settlement date while the funds remain in the trust account.
     
    Terry_w likes this.
  7. Yson

    Yson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    361
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yes
     
  8. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    And would not be a capital cost either.
     
  9. Yson

    Yson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    361
    Location:
    Sydney
    As i am not sure how long it would take to settle as police is now involved and then will have to wait for their report and quotes for repairs etc, but intention is to settle, as it's not both side intention not to settle.
     
  10. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    That doesn't change the deductibility of the interest.

    you migh be better to take the money out of the trust account and put back in your loan and then reborrow a few days before settlement again.
     
    dabbler likes this.
  11. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,555
    Location:
    Sydney
    So it can never be deductible if there is no nexus for that period ? Is a day in a solicitors trust account normally OK, how about three days, so why not two months given the situation ? Does adelay in mailing affect this ? After all obtaining a bank cheque and remission is normal so a day or two is typical. So what about 10 days...etc That was one of the elements to the Steele's issues that there can be differences between the matching principles of income and s8-1 deductions. Timing can be 1 day or much longer.

    NTAA make it up or do they have a sound written ruling they are relying upon ?

    Mike you know who taught me to question the little stuff....I'm not 100% convinced.

    Rob would likely cite something..Rob ?
     
    Perthguy likes this.
  12. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Steele's case - too soon.
     
  13. Yson

    Yson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    361
    Location:
    Sydney
    just read the findings from the web on Steele's case but still difficult to understand (may be i am not a legal guy).
     
  14. Yson

    Yson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    361
    Location:
    Sydney
    the interest is not incurred 'too soon', is not preliminary to the income earning activities, and is not a prelude to those activities;
    ·
    the interest is not private or domestic;
    ·
    the period of interest outgoings prior to the derivation of relevant assessable income is not so long, taking into account the kind of income earning activities involved, that the necessary connection between outgoings and assessable income is lost;
    ·
    the interest is incurred with one end in view, the gaining or producing of assessable income; and
    ·
    continuing efforts are undertaken in pursuit of that end.
    I can kind of understand the rest but what is the first condition about "too soon"?
     
  15. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    The connection between you incurring interest and settlement on the land may be too distant. You are incurring interest longer than the normal one or two days that usually happens.

    Furthermore the money is being held on trust for you. This is different to borrowing to pay a deposit for example. You have incurred interest but received nothing for doing so.
     
  16. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    paul as with all these things depends on the facts. I agree with @Terry_w that it is incurred too soon. I think the ATO has applied the same principles in PBR 1011391962569 where the interest between contract date and settlement was not deductible
     
  17. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,555
    Location:
    Sydney
    OK. Thats better. The ruling was for vacant land I note but the basis appears rational.
    The solicitor could apply the funds to controlled monies and earn the OP some interest and that could at least allow a deduction against the income earned. That or the redraw as Terry says.

    The interest on deposit or borrowings for duty etc if equity release was used still remains a concern.
     
  18. Yson

    Yson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    361
    Location:
    Sydney
    But can i ask my legal to return the interests earned in their trust account (as i think it will take ages to settle again, e.g. waiting report from police n their insurance claims)?
     
  19. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    is interest being earned on the solicitor's trust account ?
     
  20. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Solicitor trust accounts don't pay interest. You want the money held returned.