Tax Tip 257: Family Trust Elections and Estate Planning

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Terry_w, 5th Dec, 2019.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,004
    Location:
    Australia wide
    When making a family trust election (FTE) careful consideration should be given to the potential future estate planning effects, especially on the death of the test individual.

    For a quick summary of FTEs see:

    Tax Tip 255: What is a Family Trust election? Tax Tip 255: What is a Family Trust election?


    Example

    Homer sets up Trust A to do different things such as invest in shares. A FTE is made with Homer being the nominated Test Individual.



    Homer dies, after falling off a horse.



    Bart takes over control of Trust A. The test individual is still Homer and cannot be changed.

    Bart starts up Trust B a while later. It might be used to hold property or a business and runs at a loss. Bart wants to distribute the income from Trust A to Trust B to help use up the loss and to save tax.

    Trust B would need to make sure it is in the same family group as Trust A, but it cannot nominate Homer as he is dead (Subsection 272-80(3) of Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936), only living persons can be nominated.


    Planning ahead they might have nominated Bart as the test individual of Trust A


    See

    Subsection 272-80(3) of Schedule 2F to the ITAA 1936 INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT ACT 1936 - SCHEDULE 2F Trust losses and other deductions

    and

    ATO ID 2014/3 Family Trust Election: individual specified in election is deceased when election made
    https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/pri...1231235958&Life=20140205000001-99991231235959
     
  2. SatayKing

    SatayKing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Sep, 2017
    Posts:
    10,781
    Location:
    Extended Sabatical
    Thanks @Terry_w. Always find these tips interesting.

    Just wondering when or if Selma or Patty are ever going to get a look in though.
     
    Terry_w likes this.
  3. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,004
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Thanks Satayking, I was running out of characters to include. I was almost going to go the Southpark route, but will be able to hold off for a while now.
     
  4. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,547
    Location:
    Sydney
    Patty and Selma make poor subjects. They barely work and have no (stable) partners. I kinda suspect at least one defacto issue may be kept silent.

    On the issue of making Bart a test individual the issue I would see is a minor cannot satisfy the control test. There are also limits as you run deeper to the family tree. I recently explored why / how a child may make a better test individual but this issue was the limiting factor. The problem with parents is taking a punt on who may live longer. I'm not convinced that a child is the solution. I wish the FTE had a death option which allowed a spouse from the same family group to be eligible for appointment when death of their spouse occurs. Its not that Bart cannot be the test individual. However there are some complications.

    I require clients to get legal advice on the issue of test individuals for this very purpose. In my opinion it is a complex issue needing legal advice. Its far more than just tax advice.
     
    Terry_w likes this.
  5. SatayKing

    SatayKing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Sep, 2017
    Posts:
    10,781
    Location:
    Extended Sabatical
    More than likely but it'd be interesting if they were nominated as guardians for Bart et.al.
     
  6. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,547
    Location:
    Sydney
    :eek: Ay karumba
     
  7. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    If bart was the nominated test individual any distributions made to selma or patty would be subject to family trust distributions tax
     
  8. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    With around 100 characters from various episodes you have a plethora to choose from.
     
    Terry_w likes this.
  9. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    A family trust election can be varied in certain circumstances.
     
  10. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,250
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Does the test individual need to be a living person or can it be a company?
     
  11. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    A company isnt an individual
     
    Terry_w likes this.