Media Reports CBA to drop 95% LVR to 90%

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by Paul@PAS, 13th Mar, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,647
    Location:
    Sydney
    Media reports a CBA spokesperson says LVR max of 95% is gone. To be 90% max.
     
    Dean Collins likes this.
  2. Redom

    Redom Mortgage Broker Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,678
    Location:
    Sydney (Australia Wide)
    Yep - most had already done this earlier, CBA simply made servicing harder for 90%+ but have now dropped to 90.

    In most circumstances doesn't make too much sense to go above 90 for INV deals given the higher LMI % premiums. But it does mean less options available for these scenarios.
     
  3. Gockie

    Gockie Life is good ☺️ Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,841
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yep.
    Speedbump hitting... so why not.

    CBA changes LVR for home loan investors

    CBA changes LVR for home loan investors

    "Commonwealth Bank constantly reviews and monitors its home loans portfolio to ensure we are meeting our responsible lending and regulatory obligations, and the needs of our customers.

    Today we are reducing the maximum Loan-to-Value ratio for investment home loans to 90 per cent, meaning investors should ensure they have a 10 per cent deposit. This change relates only to investment home loans and is effective immediately (13 March, 2017).

    There has been no change for owner occupier home loans.

    Every home loan application is assessed on a case-by-case basis, and we expect this change will affect a very small percentage of the home loan applications we receive.

    Dan Huggins, Executive General Manager Home Buying, Commonwealth Bank, said: “We are constantly reviewing our home loan portfolio. Today’s change will enable us to meet our customers’ needs, while further strengthening our high quality home loan business and ensuring we continue to meet our responsible lending and regulatory obligations.”
     
  4. Jamie Moore

    Jamie Moore MORTGAGE BROKER - AUSTRALIA WIDE Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,980
    Location:
    Canberra, Brisbane and Sunshine Coast
    It's a done deal - received the email today.

    All good - just another change to work with.

    Cheers

    Jamie
     
    andrew_t likes this.
  5. Peter_Tersteeg

    Peter_Tersteeg Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,186
    Location:
    03 9877 3000
    Here's a extract from this morning's email:


    Changes to Maximum LVR Amounts

    Effective immediately we are reducing the maximum LVR for these application types:

    ►Investment Home Loans from 95% to 90%
    ►Viridian Lines of Credit (personal and investment purposes) from 92% to 90%
    ►Home/Investment Home Loans refinancing an OFI Home Loan from 92% to 90%
    ►Home/Investment Home Loans with a Bridging Loans Feature from 92% to 90%
    ►Home/Investment Home Loans with a Low Documentation Feature from 82% to 80%


    Not particularly surprising. The CBA was overly aggressive last year in persuing investment lending and one of the few offering 95%. This is simply pulling in the extremes a little, I wouldn't have been surprised if they'd done more.
     
  6. hammer

    hammer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    2,874
    Location:
    Darwin
    Is anyone still offering 95 percent LVR loans?
     
  7. Dean Collins

    Dean Collins Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    21st Feb, 2016
    Posts:
    982
    Location:
    New York
    Good. I'm surprised APRA hasn't insisted on this industry wide.
     
  8. MJS1034

    MJS1034 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    426
    Location:
    Sunshine Coast
    Does this mean CBA are back doing investment lending or are they still sitting out?
     
  9. Peter_Tersteeg

    Peter_Tersteeg Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,186
    Location:
    03 9877 3000
    The CBA has never withdrawn from investment lending, but they have recently had some restrictions. This is just another one.
     
  10. Redom

    Redom Mortgage Broker Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,678
    Location:
    Sydney (Australia Wide)
    In recent updated prudential guidelines they did specifically mention that risk of loss is higher 'above 90% LVR', and would be prudent for banks to manage against this.
     
    Brady likes this.
  11. Marty McDonald

    Marty McDonald Mortgage broker Business Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    885
    Location:
    Sydney North Shore and Norther beaches
    So few investment 95%' ers would have be written anyway. The real killer is 90% + LMI now no longer available for Inv.
     
  12. Brady

    Brady Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,570
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
    Can't remember the last time I have done a 95% IHL. Only time I've gone above recently is on a HL equity release when I reasonable amount of LMI has been paid previously so there are credits.

    90% cap does hurt a little though as I do a fair bit 90%+LMI
     
    Dean Collins likes this.
  13. Jamie Moore

    Jamie Moore MORTGAGE BROKER - AUSTRALIA WIDE Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,980
    Location:
    Canberra, Brisbane and Sunshine Coast
    Yep :-( That was my go to for CBA deals...the good ol' 90% + LMI IP lend....they were the last decent lender to succumb to the 88% + LMI loan

    Cheers

    Jamie
     
    Ethan Timor and Brady like this.
  14. Corey Batt

    Corey Batt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,091
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
    It's exceedingly rare that we write many 95% LVR purchases, I generally advise the client against it as the overall increased deposit requirement vs LMI costs makes a 90% LVR as far more effective. The removal of 90%+LMI is certainly something which constrains the market options a little further.
     
    Brady likes this.