Margin Loans Margin Loans..how they work!

Discussion in 'Sharemarket Investing Platforms, Tools & Services' started by 24724, 17th Aug, 2005.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,654
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    Hiya

    Another, but totally disparate idea on margin loans.

    The next time you go for an IP lend.............................. most lenders will look at your 1 mill Margin lend limit( unused and all) as a 25 year PI facility

    ta

    rolf
     
  2. Nigel Ward

    Nigel Ward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    989
    Not if it's with a separate entity with no directors' guarantee they won't. ;)
     
  3. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,654
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    Hiya Nigel

    Thats a good way to get around the contingent liability because you dont have one.

    Where can I get one please :)

    ta

    rolf
     
  4. Stevec__

    Stevec__ Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    20
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi all,

    Could someone please help me understand the returns and costs to do the following:

    I wish to use the Navra fund as an example:

    Will a bank lend against the fund at 70% Max gearing and 10% buffer?

    If so, lets say I gear up to 50% (50K of my own money to make the sums easy)
    I also get a loan of 50K.

    Therefore Market Value(MV) = 100K
    and my LVR is 50%?

    Now what would be the interest cost p/a for the loan?

    If we use Steve's results of last year which were 22.4% what would the portfolio be worth at the end of the year?

    And what would be my LVR after all distributions were re-invested into the fund during the year, but allowing to take out the interest costs for the loan?


    Hope this makes some sort of sense?

    Thanks,
    Stevec.
     
  5. Nigel Ward

    Nigel Ward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    989
    Hi Steve

    Let's say the interest on your margin loan is 8.5% per annum.

    So the interest cost on $50k borrowing for 12 months interest only will be:

    50,000 x 8.5% = $4,250.

    Of course there will be some additional minor costs involved (eg loan application fee and the buy/sell spread on the fund) but let's ignore those for present purposes as they are relatively minor.

    Now you've got $100,000 in assets in the fund (your $50k + $50k loan funds).

    $100,000 x 22.43% = $22,430.

    So your gross return is $22,430.

    Your net return is $22,430 - $4,250 = $18,180.

    BUT it's not quite that simple. If you have a look at the NavraInvest website it says that for the retail fund for the year ended 30 June 2005 the return was: 22.43% with a 16.17% distribution.

    What that means is that the total return of 22.43 is comprised of 6.26% unrealised capital growth and distributed income from share trading (including a little bit of dividends) of 16.17%.

    Apply those figures here, if you chose to take your distribution rather than reinvest it you would end up with:

    Value of your investment in the fund: $106,260 plus
    Cash on hand of $11,920, i.e. $16,170 - your interest bill of $4,250.

    Give or take a little bit. :)

    Does that assist?

    Cheers
     
  6. Stevec__

    Stevec__ Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    20
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks for clearing that up Nigel.
     
  7. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    12,415
    Location:
    Sydney
    Just to make it even more clear ... here is an example using the real figures from the NavraInvest retail fund.

    You can see the actual returns for $50,000 invested on July 1st 2004, with a 50% margin loan for a total of $100,000, and an interest rate of 8%, assuming distributions are automatically reinvested. My calculations are based on using the application price for the initial investment and the redemption price for calculating point-in-time values, so my figures might be slightly different from those calculated using raw unit prices.

    With no gearing, the distribution on $50K invested for the 04/05 year would have been $8,124.94 (this is your before-tax income from the fund).

    The total return (including distributions and capital growth, but before tax) as of 1st July 05 would have been $10,806.53

    With 50% gearing, the distribution on $50K invested + $50K margin loan for the 04/05 year would have been $16,249.88 with $4,328.77 in interest charges, leaving a net income (before tax) of $11,921.11.

    The total return (including distributions and capital growth, but before tax) as of 1st July 05 would have been $21,613.06

    So you can see, with 50% gearing, your income distribution would have been $3,796.17 higher and the total return would have been $10,806.53 higher than with no gearing.

    Just remember that while gearing magnifies your gains in a rising market, it can also magnify your losses in a falling market - make sure you understand your risk tolerance and seek professional advice before using such a strategy.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Stevec__

    Stevec__ Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    20
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks Sim for going to so much trouble to make up that spreadsheet. It's great. So for someone like me who has always looked at IP's how can I gauge if its a fairly safe bet to get a margin loan? Obviously there is always a risk, that is what we all do, take risks, to get out of the rat race. With Ip's there is a risk that the property could go down in value, but I look at that as a fairly low risk if it was bought well and had all the attributes. I am highly leveraged in property atm but can sleep very easy at night and if there were threats of interest rate rises that wouldn't concern me much unless they went up to something like double what they are now
    As far as getting a margin loan and investing into a fund, it's harder for me to assess or to be comfortable with as it is a whole new line of investing for me. I wish do do it as I need to diversify and would only invest in Navra as I have faith in Steve and his product.
    I suppose for me its just a matter of going ahead and doing it. To start off slow and steady and see.
    Is there any info out there which states the major drops in the sharemarket over the years? and how that effected funds like Navra?
    Enough ramblings for now and thanks Nigel & Sim for the replys.

    Cheers,
    Stevec.
     
  9. Glebe

    Glebe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    29th Sep, 2019
    Posts:
    819
    Location:
    Central Coast NSW
    http://www.asx.com.au/about/pdf/all_ords.pdf

    Steve,

    If you're highly leveraged into property, perhaps it's a better decision to pay down some debt levels and get 11% or so pre-tax guaranteed (since your mortgage is about 7% post-tax) rather than leverage into the sharemarket and hope to make 15%.
     
  10. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    12,415
    Location:
    Sydney
    Actually Glebe - your maths there only works if you assume you are paying your debt using your personal after-tax income. My trust pays for my properties - not me, so the 7% or so I pay on my debts are paid with pre-tax dollars, and then the interest payments are tax deductible anyway, so the actual cost of them (and similarly, the actual benefit of parking money in an offset account) is less anyway.

    Don't overestimate the value of offset accounts - I think they are wonderful things and I recommend using them, but they are NOT worth "11% pre-tax guaranteed". I'll do a spreadsheet for you if you need me to.
     
  11. D.T._

    D.T._ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    54
    Hi Nigel,

    Want to share some more information on this?

    Thanks,

    Dave
     
  12. D.T._

    D.T._ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    54
    Hi,

    5 days have gone by...

    Nigel, care to elaborate on the above post? Please? :p

    CHeers,

    Dave
     
  13. Nigel Ward

    Nigel Ward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    989
    Hi Dave

    Just wanted to build the suspense :p

    I have seen some people manage to organise margin loans for their corporate trustees such that the margin lender has not required directors' guarantees (and in fact not even taken a charge over the trustee company).

    The consequence for the individuals involved is that they have no contingent liability which they need to declare to a financier lending to them personally.

    What Rolf was quite rightly referring to was the fact that some bank lenders will take the view that borrowings of trustee companies (or trading companies running a business for that matter) which a director has guaranteed are treated as though the director had made the borrowing personally for credit approval purposes.

    I.e. say you had IP loans of $500k and the trustee of your family trust had loans of $500k. When you go to the bank, they will say we'll you've actually got borrowings of $1m, not $500k so maybe we won't lend you any more. Their rationale, and it's quite correct, is that the trustee co's debt can come home to roost with you by virtue of the guarantee you've given to the margin lender for the company's debts. Now if there's no guarantee that does not apply.

    Shop around (ie download all the application material for the various margin lenders) and see which ones require what form of security.

    Cheers
    N.