QLD Logan City Council to curtail property loophole - Granny Flats

Discussion in 'Where to Buy' started by Rich2011, 19th Oct, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. RPI

    RPI SDA Provider, Town Planner, Former Property Lawyer

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,025
    Location:
    Brisbane

    Likely to apply at Plan Sealing when all is complete.
     
  2. Joseph33

    Joseph33 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Mar, 2017
    Posts:
    150
    Location:
    Nsw
    Sorry could you clarify plan sealing? I'm from Sydney. I'm assuming that's some sort of final approval/inspection like a form 21?
     
  3. gach2

    gach2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    29th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,922
    Location:
    sydney
    I wasnt aware that plans were sealed by LCC for auxiliary units

    Currently infrastructure is being invoiced when plumbing and drainage compliance certificates are being issued so good chance thats when payment would be required. Atleast thats what's occuring with dual occs in LCC
    Also the infrastructure on that is less than 23k.
     
  4. Katie767575

    Katie767575 Member

    Joined:
    15th Jan, 2017
    Posts:
    8
    Location:
    Sydney
    So it’s going to cost $23.000 in permits to build a granny flat on a house over 700 sqm I have called logan council but they never got back to me will call again today.
     
    radioactive, Tom Rivera and Whitecat like this.
  5. HapppyChat

    HapppyChat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Apr, 2016
    Posts:
    65
    Location:
    Geelong Victoria
    Katie I would be interested in how your call went. It appears from other posts the infrastructure fee will be implement from July 1st 2018, while the planning restrictions of a minimum 700sqm block and 18m frontage may take some more time to be changed.
     
  6. Whitecat

    Whitecat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    4,532
    Location:
    Sydney
    Population will take care of that. Once upon a time suburbs full of terrace houses (instead of detached) were probably less desirable.
     
    mickyyyy likes this.
  7. New Town

    New Town Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8th Sep, 2015
    Posts:
    746
    Location:
    QLD & NSW
    I see the granny flats as a good way to intensify land use to create accommodation. And probably better than the heavier single battle-axe subdivision. So a backward step by Council.
     
    Rich2011 and Tom Rivera like this.
  8. HapppyChat

    HapppyChat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Apr, 2016
    Posts:
    65
    Location:
    Geelong Victoria
    From the Logan council website for those looking to build next year.
     
  9. Sea Eagles88

    Sea Eagles88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    125
    Location:
    Sydney
    Would it be wise to lodge an application and get it to the decision stage before 1 July 2018 if I have intention of building granny flat (I want to build after 1 July 2018) ? and how long does the DA last before it expires ?
     
    Tom Rivera likes this.
  10. LJW

    LJW Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    68
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Yes, definitely. I believe it lasts for 6 years under The Planning Act 2016.
     
    Invest_noob likes this.
  11. Mel Morgan

    Mel Morgan Sydney Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    6th Jun, 2017
    Posts:
    1,455
    Location:
    Sydney
    I have a 700sqm Logan block with only 12m frontage (end of a cul-de-sac) and I just got off the phone with a granny flat builder who tells me Logan council already will not approve these given their changes are inevitable. Has this been anyone else's experience? It would be a shame as the site lends quite well to a granny flat.
     
  12. Invest_noob

    Invest_noob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    21st Mar, 2017
    Posts:
    299
    Location:
    Sydney
    I spoke to a town planner who looked into it for me. I have a 620sqm block and he came back saying they won't approve it unless there's a really good reason to to make an exemption.
     
  13. Mel Morgan

    Mel Morgan Sydney Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    6th Jun, 2017
    Posts:
    1,455
    Location:
    Sydney
    I have put in a message with Logan council to see what their planners say. I found this fact sheet on their website which was specifically updated this month, but does not mention the minimum size or frontage:
    http://www.logan.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/322296/Fact-Sheet-Domestic-Housing.pdf
    Now that I've decided I want a granny flat - I don't want to give up without a fight!
     
  14. Invest_noob

    Invest_noob Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    21st Mar, 2017
    Posts:
    299
    Location:
    Sydney
    Not really looking to build now as I don't see the demand there but I was just looking to get the DA now when it may still be possible so that if I decide to sell in future, it will bump up the value. Good luck, let us know how you go.
     
  15. Tom Rivera

    Tom Rivera Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    2,718
    Location:
    South East Queensland
    It's interesting that you're having problems getting a granny flat approved, because "Dual-Occupancy" properties, which exist under the same auxiliary dwelling rules, are self-assessable. Council doesn't have an option to refuse them.
     
  16. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    Why am I not surprised....after all that hoo haa about GF in Logan (nuts in my opinion you will never get your money back)....

    Next step will be to limit cheap T/H and Villa developments.....away from major infrastructure....

    Lesson number one ....never buy a property with potential for development down the track buy what it can do today by a country mile....that could change anytime. Lots of people with little development experience are jumping in....unlike parts Sydney and Melbourne...parts of Brisbane it does not make sense to develop....too much supply.
     
    Invest_noob likes this.
  17. Mel Morgan

    Mel Morgan Sydney Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    6th Jun, 2017
    Posts:
    1,455
    Location:
    Sydney
    The GF still makes sense to me, because the backyard is sitting there, I have the equity but not the serviceability to buy more. Its a supply/demand equation and there are people willing to rent them at 10% yield. In 10 years time the GF has earned back what its cost (and hopefully still be standing) and in the meanwhile I have increased my serviceability by boosting my income?
     
    Blueskies and Invest_noob like this.
  18. Sea Eagles88

    Sea Eagles88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    125
    Location:
    Sydney
    does the number really stack up ? how much is it going to cost to build the GF ? 140K ? and how much rent you will get ? $300 per week ?

    you can buy 2 bedroom unit (maybe 20 years old) in the area for 180K with $270 pw rent
     
  19. Rich2011

    Rich2011 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    9th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    1,315
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Depends, can you buy another property before the 10 years is up, that is what should give you the better growth over time?
     
  20. Mel Morgan

    Mel Morgan Sydney Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    6th Jun, 2017
    Posts:
    1,455
    Location:
    Sydney
    I welcome the discussion, so thanks for putting forward your thoughts.

    Lets say $140k to build the GF and $280pw to rent out. The will be depreciation and minimal maintenance plus no additional rates or strata fees compared to buying an older unit. (and having owned this house more than a decade, the capital growth has been extremely limited last 8 years or so).

    I suppose the question is, is there better use of the $140k...will the existing property with GF be worth original value + $140k? If the area grows, will this go up in proportion?

    I have access to the capital from my Syd development projects so that is not as much of a consideration.
     
    Tom Rivera likes this.