Lessons learnt

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by hash_investor, 7th Jun, 2016.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. hash_investor

    hash_investor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    2,440
    Location:
    Sydney / Canberra
    MTR likes this.
  2. Angel

    Angel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,816
    Location:
    Paradise, Brisbane
    Waterfront property is over rated.;)
     
  3. hash_investor

    hash_investor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    2,440
    Location:
    Sydney / Canberra
    Indeed
     
  4. Justin_Z

    Justin_Z Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    634
    Location:
    Sydney | Servicing Australia wide
    Seems like the insurance companies have been flooded with claims, shame that they're not keeping these beachfront guys afloat.
     
  5. EN710

    EN710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,218
    Location:
    Melburn
  6. Observer

    Observer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    606
    Location:
    Sydney
    I suspect there might be an opportunity to buy a house on the second line without water views. Soon enough it will be first line overlooking the ocean ;).
     
  7. Observer

    Observer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    606
    Location:
    Sydney
    On a serious note I do feel for the owners who may loose everything. Insurance company lawyers will come up with some kind of excuse to not pay the claims...
     
  8. trinity168

    trinity168 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    942
    Location:
    Sydney
    I heard over the radio that 2 out of the 8 houses on that beach front were due for auction in a couple of weeks.
     
  9. Tenex

    Tenex Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    570
    Location:
    Sydney
    If they dont want to pay, either they will leave their PDS open to interpretation or they will always find excuses or both. Trust me they are smarter than you think and we live in a capitalist country where the British common law can be interpreted in favour of whoever has more money :)

    The best option is for all those people to join forces, hire a good lawyer and smash them in court
     
    Observer likes this.
  10. wogitalia

    wogitalia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    872
    Location:
    Perth
    Don't think the lawyers will have to look very hard, it's clearly written in the PDS that you receive as part of the policy, if you were stupid enough to buy a house in that location and not insure it against acts of the sea by paying the extra then that's 100% on you. It's the same as getting a 3rd party car insurance policy and not paying for fire and theft and then not being able to claim when the car gets stolen.

    It's sad they've quite possibly lost their homes and the inconvenience of that but not having insurance for this type of event is not something they deserve a modicum of sympathy for because it's entirely their own fault. Any financial loss is entirely on them and was completely their fault.

    If they had the insurance cover then they have nothing to worry about...
     
  11. T.C.

    T.C. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    126
    Location:
    rural NSW
    Wow! That's incredible!

    From the TV and pics it appears that these houses weren't protected by rock bolders like the other properties to either side? Wonder what the story is there?

    Something will have to be done now though even when the houses go to protect the road.

    See ya's.
     
    MTR likes this.
  12. Observer

    Observer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    606
    Location:
    Sydney
    As @Tenex says above I wouldn't be so sure even if it was in the PDS.
     
    wogitalia likes this.
  13. wogitalia

    wogitalia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    872
    Location:
    Perth
    Then the lawyers would have their work cut out a bit more at least but it's in just about every PDS, it's one of those categories they include for a very good reason and charge extra for.
     
  14. Marg4000

    Marg4000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,429
    Location:
    Qld
    Acts of the sea are rarely covered by insurance policies.
    Marg
     
    willair, Bayview and Observer like this.
  15. hash_investor

    hash_investor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    2,440
    Location:
    Sydney / Canberra
    Acts of the sea are not covered. It is not an excuse they are coming up with.

    On a different note, insurance companies can't come up with excuses like that to avoid paying claims. No one will do business with them if all they hear is excuses.
     
  16. Azazel

    Azazel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,091
    Location:
    Brisbane
    It's all good, the government is putting together a package so they - we - can bail them out.
     
  17. big max

    big max Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Nov, 2015
    Posts:
    2,091
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    Lesson to me is be careful where you buy if you want beachfront. Look at prior water events. Look at whether council has taken a coordinated approach to protect. Gold Coast is a great example in this regard. Now has an extensive protection and replenishment program in place and as a result held up really well in recent days.

    Check and carefully negotiate any insurance policy. And if you are really crafty and legally inclined, engage with communications with council to help build a good basis for a future negligence claim if needed.
     
  18. marty998

    marty998 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    627
    Location:
    Sydney
    This is because you are not supposed to build your house in the middle of the ocean?

    I read somewhere that these same residents rejected the proposed building of a sea wall last year by Council because it would affect "the look" of their beach?

    I sympathise, but blind Freddy has known for decades that Collaroy beach would be washed away in a storm surge one day...
     
  19. HUGH72

    HUGH72 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,022
    Location:
    QLD
    Azazel likes this.
  20. wogitalia

    wogitalia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    872
    Location:
    Perth
    Sadly this is true. I hate that we constantly want to bail people out for being idiots. Stop rewarding stupidity in society and maybe we might start to move forward again.

    Hate this bolded part, it's not the council, state or federal governments job to protect your poorly designed house. If you want to build in what is well known to be an at risk location then you should pay, not fellow rates payers or tax payers, it should be 100% your responsibility. Funnily enough one of the articles mentioned one of the guys in the area who got the council approval and paid for the protection and as a result his house suffered only minor water damage...
     
    Erida, Angel and Bayview like this.