I hope you are not the PM for this property in Sydney for Auction..

Discussion in 'Property Management' started by Pumpkin, 30th Jun, 2016.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Pumpkin

    Pumpkin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,342
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Xenia likes this.
  2. mrdobalina

    mrdobalina Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,970
    Location:
    there's more to life than working
    $180k clean up costs? Lol

    I don't understand how the bailiff can auction off the property based on monies owned by the tenant, and not the owner???
     
    Pumpkin and Xenia like this.
  3. Depreciator

    Depreciator Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,963
    Location:
    Sydney
    Tenants? They own the property and have done for a long time I recall.
     
  4. mrdobalina

    mrdobalina Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,970
    Location:
    there's more to life than working
    Sorry, I thought I read it was tenanted.
     
  5. Perthguy

    Perthguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,767
    Location:
    Perth
    I think people get the idea they are tenants because of the misuse of the term "evicting" in the article. You "evict" tenants, not owners.

    The house is owned by Mary Bobolas and her adult daughters Elena and Liana, who bought it in 1970 for $25,000. It was expected to sell for between $1.5 million and $2.5 million.

    While the responsibility for evicting the family might put some buyers off, agents felt that others would see the enormous potential of the 550 square metre land holding, with one neighbour on the same street having subdivided his block and built two semi-detached houses on a similar sized lot.
    Hang on a sec. "Evicting" might be the right word. If you are the owner, they would technically be squatters. Do you evict squatters?
     
    Pumpkin likes this.
  6. Xenia

    Xenia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    3,863
    Seems like a repossession for finance purposes not a lease termination eviction.
     
    Pumpkin and Perthguy like this.
  7. wylie

    wylie Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,020
    Location:
    Brisbane
    From reading it (from a different site today) it is the council recouping the $180K they've spent from clearing the junk on numerous occasions. It was suggested these women (mother and two adult daughters) had relatives who were giving them money to stave off the auction process.
     
    Pumpkin likes this.
  8. Xenia

    Xenia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    3,863
    Oh wow
     
    Pumpkin likes this.
  9. Pumpkin

    Pumpkin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,342
    Location:
    Brisbane

    Oh wow 2!
     
    Xenia likes this.