How much is your income lowered by neg gearing?

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Otie, 19th Feb, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Otie

    Otie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Mar, 2016
    Posts:
    1,404
    Location:
    Vic
    Now, I know this is a bit of a "how long is a piece of string" question, but, on average, how much is your taxable income being lowered by negative gearing?
    I understand many on here are cashflow positive month to month, but I assume a lot are negative by tax time after all interest/expenses etc.
    We haven't done a return yet as we only recently only purchased this financial year.
    Im curious to know on average how much your IPs lower your taxable incomes, taking into consideration depreciation benefits etc
     
  2. twobobsworth

    twobobsworth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    772
    Location:
    Sydney, New South Wales
    I pay about 10%.
     
    Otie likes this.
  3. Hodgo

    Hodgo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    218
    Location:
    Baldivis, WA
    Hi Otie,

    After depreciation, fees and interest payments on 4 IPs plus depreciation for car we have altered my tax withholding so I'm only paying 8% tax throughout the year :). Even though 3 of my IPs are cashflow neutral.

    We do this to save waiting for a one off payment in July.
     
    Otie likes this.
  4. Otie

    Otie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Mar, 2016
    Posts:
    1,404
    Location:
    Vic
    Thanks for the posts. Im just looking forward to our first tax return to see what to expect in the future. I much prefer the idea of paying into my own future than handing over to the tax man.
     
  5. Ross Forrester

    Ross Forrester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    2,085
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    I am positively geared. I like investments to make money.

    Each to their own.
     
    Beachman, neK, Darren and 1 other person like this.
  6. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    I have been retired for 6 years. I (foolishly) thought that after the first year in retirement, all future year tax returns would basically be the same.

    On no, how wrong I was. Super fund changes, tax changes, turning 60, a reno here and there, buying an IP that turned out cashflow neutral portfolio to severely negative, ... has meant that , in the last 6 years, each tax return has been significantly different.

    Just means that I have to do tax planning with our accountant on an ongoing basis, just like we always have.

    Sorry to burst your bubble :) :).
     
    Phantom, wylie, Perthguy and 2 others like this.
  7. Zoolander

    Zoolander Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15th Dec, 2016
    Posts:
    668
    Location:
    Sydney
    Like twobobsworth, I pay about 10% in tax. Negatively geared with near neutral cashflow, excluding salary.
     
    Otie likes this.
  8. Hodgo

    Hodgo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    218
    Location:
    Baldivis, WA
    Even after depreciation ? I understand cash flow positive usually means after fees and interest have been deducted. But if depreciation is taken into account wouldn't most be negative? It's good as im making cashflow yet am not paying any tax on it :)
     
    kierank likes this.
  9. Zoolander

    Zoolander Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    15th Dec, 2016
    Posts:
    668
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thats the ideal sweet spot I'd love to be in... Swing in under $18k taxable income with a positive cashflow. Is that what you mean?
     
  10. Ross Forrester

    Ross Forrester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    2,085
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Yes. But every person has different goals, objectives and stress points. No judgement from me on anybody and I have been around for a bit longer than others.

    The business generates the cash to invest carefully.
     
    Wukong likes this.
  11. Hedgy

    Hedgy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6th May, 2016
    Posts:
    152
    Location:
    Sydney
    Not everyone chases income producing investments...there is merit in chasing capital growth.

    One of my IPs has made an annual (income) loss of about $25k per year since 2011 providing me with a healthy negative gearing benefit and during the same period has seen CG of $700k. Personally, I couldn't give a toss about income with those figures.
     
    Phantom, Perthguy and Jimmy D like this.
  12. Hodgo

    Hodgo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    218
    Location:
    Baldivis, WA
    WOW, that's amazing. Well done.
     
  13. Hedgy

    Hedgy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6th May, 2016
    Posts:
    152
    Location:
    Sydney
    IP is in Sydney's inner west, which has experienced dramatically CG since 2010/2011. Those chasing rental yield will complain about the inner west, but CG is what I chase.
     
    Perthguy and MJS1034 like this.
  14. Otie

    Otie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Mar, 2016
    Posts:
    1,404
    Location:
    Vic
    I agree, I'm in it for the next 40 years plus so chasing CG. Happy to see in the Herald Sun yesterday growth for the suburb we bought in has been $104 per day for the past year....I'd much prefer than than short term cashflow which I'd be taxed higher on anyway
     
    Hedgy likes this.
  15. Fluid36

    Fluid36 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Feb, 2017
    Posts:
    74
    Location:
    Sydney
    How can you have such a large deduction when 3 properties are cashflow neutral? You must have a lot of "expenses"
     
  16. Fluid36

    Fluid36 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Feb, 2017
    Posts:
    74
    Location:
    Sydney
    Is this only possible because of depreciation? I don't understand how these posts state cashflow neutral / positive but still have the room for such large deductions.
     
    Hedgy and Joynz like this.
  17. Ross Forrester

    Ross Forrester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    2,085
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Everybody is different.

    I have not bought in Perth for 10 years and I am pleased I have not.

    If you want CG you have to get the cycle right.
     
  18. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,553
    Location:
    Sydney
    EVERY property is different and every investor portfolio is different. And even then each taxpayer has a different taxable income prior to net rental income.

    Some taxpayers seek positive taxable income and some seek negative gearing. Some seek really large neg gearing. And negative gearing and cashflow arent always the same. Many aim for positive cashflow but seek negative gearing through depreciation etc
     
  19. Sonamic

    Sonamic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,340
    Location:
    Sunny QLD
    Positive Cashflow. CG on the rise. Properties all have good Depreciation being new or near new. Pay about 3% of measly PAYG in Tax.
     
  20. Barny

    Barny Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    3,191
    Location:
    Australia

    Hi hodge, I'm not understanding that you pay 8% tax. Also @twobobsworth @Zoolander?
    Are you guys saying that you're in a certain tax bracket, then after all deductions it brings you into a lower tax bracket?

    Eg, your in the 32.5% tax bracket which means your earning between 37-80k a year, then after say 4 investment propertys Deductions which can total say 20-30k brings you down a tax bracket into the 19% bracket of 18-37k?
     
    Joynz likes this.