"How Labor's tax policy will deliver 'perverse' outcomes" AFR

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Eric Wu, 7th Apr, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Eric Wu

    Eric Wu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    1,603
    Location:
    Australia
    Blueskies likes this.
  2. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,255
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    But a couple with $1m are rich... :rolleyes:
     
    Francesco and Eric Wu like this.
  3. Eric Wu

    Eric Wu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    1,603
    Location:
    Australia
    and rare
     
  4. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,255
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    I must mix in the wrong circles.
     
    Marg4000 likes this.
  5. Eric Wu

    Eric Wu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    1,603
    Location:
    Australia
    You are in the elite group, ;)
     
  6. Vicki S

    Vicki S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    I can see a lot of people who did not want to go on the pension seeing it as an attractive option. Shorten really had bad advice on the outcomes for retirees and low income earners. The examples like this just keep coming in.
     
  7. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    Totally agree.

    We should be incentivising people to fund their retirement, NOT get rid of a few dollars (by going on an expensive holiday, buying a new luxury car, upgrading to a more expensive home, blowing it at the casino/horses/dogs, ...) so they can get more retirement income by raiding the public purse :eek:.
     
    willair and oracle like this.
  8. Ed Barton

    Ed Barton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,229
    Location:
    Brisbane
    At what cost?
     
  9. willair

    willair Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,796
    Location:
    ....UKI nth nsw ....
    I don't think Mr Shorten and the silent closed back door control union people had a serious think about the plan under the test of originality..
    That's the one item Labor will never understand that between life employment and death for someone who has worked paid all taxes and had a plan for self funded retirement and led a calibrated life,only to find out the rules changed and will vote against and start rebelling against entrapment..
     
  10. willy1111

    willy1111 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    285
    Location:
    Melbourne
    The tax free earnings on up to $3.2m for a couple in pension phase which may continue for decades isn't really sustainable to bring in enough tax to support the ageing population. The number of employees working and paying tax to support the country is getting less and less.

    I would expect some big changes to this tax free pension limits/income in the future, it is very very generous.

    Maybe continue to tax Super in Accumulation phase the way it is, remove Contribution limits, once reach preservation age (60 for most now) tax Super earnings at Marginal tax rate.

    The concessional tax rate in accumulation phase would allow one to build a bigger asset base, compounding with less drag due to lower tax rates, that would be the carrot to put money into Super.
     
    Last edited: 10th Apr, 2018
  11. oracle

    oracle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,461
    Location:
    Canberra
    I personally think if Labour win the next election and somehow manage to pass this change in whatever shape or form will mark the end of franking credits for future generations except may be pensioners and low income earners.

    The rules will keep getting tightened ever so slightly over the coming decade. Once this becomes a law it will keep getting tinkered until almost everyone becomes ineligible to qualify except a handful mentioned above.

    This is in my opinion inevitable, we may get lower personal income taxes in return.

    Cheers,
    Oracle.
     
  12. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    Huge cost to the Government, 20 to 30 years of full Aged Pension payments for the wife and me :D
     
  13. Ed Barton

    Ed Barton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,229
    Location:
    Brisbane
    From what you've disclosed here I'd say that's not true. There could be no super and you and your wife would have provided for your retirement - and get no pension.

    For people like you and I the super system doesn't take us off the pension it merely gives us a tax advantaged additional savings vehicle.

    Perhaps for others with similar income super will take them off the pension. So at what cost? Or what cost to the budget? For how long? It's complex, and I don't have the answers to those questions.

    Planes, trains, (casinos) and automobiles:
    I think it is inevitable that restrictions will be placed on how super is drawn down. If super is tax advantaged to provide for retirement then it only makes cents there are restrictions on how fast one can spend it.
     
  14. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    Not if we withdraw enough to get us below the thresholds and take it to the casino to put all on red :D.


    If BS wants to tell people how to spend their hard earned cash, that is a pile of BS’s BS.

    We don’t tell people on welfare (eg pensioners) how to spend their payments :D.
     
  15. Ed Barton

    Ed Barton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,229
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Nonsensical post. Please repost in something that is understandable.

    Is this what the Liberal/National/Liberal National/Country Liberal parties said to post in their latest newsletters?
     
  16. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    Nonsensical post. Please repost in something that is understandable.
     
  17. Ed Barton

    Ed Barton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,229
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Did you not know that coalition is made up of four political parties?

    It might scare the Menzies out of you, but the coalition is made up of four parties all working (attacking each other) together.

    Back to super...