Debt Recycling into Shares - Joint Ownership

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by costanza, 4th Mar, 2021.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. costanza

    costanza Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Sep, 2016
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney
    I haven't seen this come up, but assuming there's a simple explanation:

    If you own a PPOR 50-50 with your spouse. And debt recycle 100k to invest in shares.

    Say your spouse is currently not working, to take advantage of this, you buy 100k income producing shares in their name, in their share trading account. Would only 50% of the 100k be deductible? Since the 100k isn't being used to produce YOU income, but your spouse.

    Basically the question is, if the loan and title of the home are in joint ownership, would the share trading account also need to be a joint account, and any income be split between both people to make the entire 100k redraw be deductible?
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
  3. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,555
    Location:
    Sydney
    If in their name they must be a co-borrower. If that ia a loss then it may carry forward. Franking etc may be refundable. The issue about the borrowing. There can be one share owner if the borrowings are joint.
     
  4. costanza

    costanza Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Sep, 2016
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney
    I see, seems quite straight forward then. To confirm my understand then: A&B are co-borrowers on a loan. Then split and debt recycle 100k and buy shares in B's name. B will deduct 100% of the interest on the 100k, whereas A would claim any deductions.

    Edit: whereas A would'NT
     
    Last edited: 4th Mar, 2021
    Never giveup likes this.
  5. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,555
    Location:
    Sydney
    A would NOT claim any deduction. B owns the shares. B used the borrowed funds.
     
  6. costanza

    costanza Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Sep, 2016
    Posts:
    72
    Location:
    Sydney
    Oops that's what I meant. Thanks Paul and Terry
     
    Paul@PAS and Terry_w like this.
  7. mbrozy

    mbrozy New Member

    Joined:
    14th May, 2021
    Posts:
    1
    Location:
    Brisbane
    On a slightly different note, would you actually buy income-producing shares for someone not working or in a lower tax bracket? For debt recycling. Isn't it the most beneficial if the income (and the deduction on interest) is for a person with a higher tax bracket? (higher tax bracket = higher deduction on interest).

    If I'm missing something? Thanks!
     
  8. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,555
    Location:
    Sydney
    It would depend on what the expected income, CGT and interest deduction numbers were. Whether there is a annual tax benefit from interest is to be considered. eg If Mary (Peters wife) has a taxable income of $0 then she can earn up to $20K+ tax free so those interest deductions arent really much value and so investing without borrowing makes greater sense. It may better suit Peter to have those deductions annually and then in three years he could end up with a CGT amount and after CGT discounts the tax rate is max 23.5%...

    A disc trust with a related party on-loan may be the most optimal but comes with initial costs + annual costs. But that trust may accrue tax losses if it has no other income and just incurs interest and will only have taxable income when the CGT amount is realised.
     
    mbrozy likes this.
  9. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    It depends if you know the person or not.
    Even if spouses it may not be beneficial to buy them in the name of the spouse. If you do there are estate planning and other legal implications.
     
    mbrozy likes this.
  10. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,555
    Location:
    Sydney
    Buying shares in the name of another person doesnt mean they own them. Who is liable for tax ?
    This occurs with parents who think they can use kids names. The tax issue may remain with the parents. The beneficial ownership may remain with the parent rather than the child who is a merely legal custodian. (Ignoring they are a minor)

    eg ATO says

    Whoever rightfully owns and controls the shares declares the dividends and any net capital loss or gain from the sale of shares. You need to consider who:
    • provides the money for the shares
    • makes share decisions
    • spends the dividend income.
    If there are large amounts of money or a regular turnover, you might need to examine the ownership of the shares further, including finding more information to work out who should declare the dividends.
     
    mbrozy likes this.