Bank account set for first IP

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Nad, 10th Dec, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Did the offset, at any time, contain non-borrowed and borrowed money? If so the loan is mixed purpose. If not then you might have a case to argue no mixing occurred. I can't tell from the original post.
     
  2. Harper Lee

    Harper Lee Member

    Joined:
    14th Dec, 2018
    Posts:
    18
    Location:
    South Melbourne
    Terry you are over complicating the scenario. The equity loan funds were flushed into the PPR Offset and the next day, he moved it to the Equity loan offset. All he has to do is not claim the interest for that 1 day as a deduction.
     
  3. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Are you qualified and licensed to advise on tax?
     
  4. Harper Lee

    Harper Lee Member

    Joined:
    14th Dec, 2018
    Posts:
    18
    Location:
    South Melbourne
    I am not licensed Terry. But if you read what he has posted properly, it is clearly a misdirection of the equity funds being deposited into his offset for PPOR. If he transfers that money the next day in the offset for equity loan, he only accrues interest for 1 day which he does not claim. Since the funds sat in his PPOR offset, there is no issue for tax deductions. When he utilised the funds from the offset against the equity loan for investment purposes, the interest that accrues will then be deductible if used for the purchase on an income producing asset.
     
  5. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Have you read the Domjan case?

    As a tax lawyer, qualified and licenced, I must disagree with your assessment.
     
  6. Harper Lee

    Harper Lee Member

    Joined:
    14th Dec, 2018
    Posts:
    18
    Location:
    South Melbourne
    The Domjan case is not specific to this case as he hadn't purchased the investment at the time of the funds being made available. As the funds were transferred the next day from the offset in the PPOR to equity loan, as long as he doesn't claim the interest for the 1 day from the equity loan he will be fine.

    You're making a mountain out of a molehill and if you look at the findings of Domjan, it has nothing to do with this scenario.
     
  7. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    I say you are wrong.
     
  8. Nad

    Nad Active Member

    Joined:
    12th Feb, 2018
    Posts:
    30
    Location:
    Sydney
    Do you think is it better to get a private ruling from ATO regarding this?
     
  9. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    No
     
  10. Nad

    Nad Active Member

    Joined:
    12th Feb, 2018
    Posts:
    30
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi Terry,

    Why do you think it is a bad idea?
     
  11. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    The answer is 100% clear cut.

    What question would you ask?
     
  12. Nad

    Nad Active Member

    Joined:
    12th Feb, 2018
    Posts:
    30
    Location:
    Sydney
    Just to explain what has happened and suggest how we'll be handling it. Therefore, it is clear now how to handle it and hopefully there won't be issues in the future.

    Unless there is a disadvantage, isn't it better to get it in writing from ATO?
     
  13. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    they don't give answers like that. You would have to explain your situation and ask a legal question such as 'would the interest be deductible in full under s8-1.'

    They will then say yes or no and supply an explanation.

    The trouble is if you get a no, if you then claim a deduction they will impose higher penalties.

    its like asking your mum can i eat the chocolate cake in the fridge? If she said no and you eat it you would be in bigger trouble then if you just ate it without asking
     
  14. mikey7

    mikey7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Mar, 2016
    Posts:
    1,173
    Location:
    Sydney, Brisbane
    My understanding is that the funds must be paid directly from the loan itself. Not the offset.

    Especially not with any detours like the OP has; Loan > PPOR offset > loan offset > payment.

    My bank put the funds of my equity release into its associated offset. So, I placed the funds back into the loan itself, and paid the expenses directly from the loan account.
     
  15. Nad

    Nad Active Member

    Joined:
    12th Feb, 2018
    Posts:
    30
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi Terry,

    I saw this rulining the ATO website. It says that if you withdraw funds from offset (even for non income producing purposes ) the interest is deductable.

    What am i missing?

    Question 3 of following link.

    Legal Database
     
  16. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    are the offset funds borrowed money or cash?
     
  17. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
  18. Nad

    Nad Active Member

    Joined:
    12th Feb, 2018
    Posts:
    30
    Location:
    Sydney
    offset has borrowed money
     
  19. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,005
    Location:
    Australia wide
    can you quote the relevant sections of the ruling?
     
  20. Nad

    Nad Active Member

    Joined:
    12th Feb, 2018
    Posts:
    30
    Location:
    Sydney
    taxpayer with an acceptable loan account offset arrangement with dual accounts is entitled to claim a deduction for the full amount of interest incurred on the loan account whilst the loan is used wholly for income producing purposes.

    This will remain the case even if funds are withdrawn from the deposit account and used for non-income producing purposes.