arrivals, departures and immigration

Discussion in 'Property Market Economics' started by igor1234, 20th Apr, 2024.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Propin

    Propin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    7th Mar, 2016
    Posts:
    3,704
    Location:
    Perth
    For Perth a lot of new arrivals that are families are paying Relocation Agents to help source a property to rent before they arrive. Minority are also choosing to buy (if they can) before arriving. Air BNB is sometimes used for starters also.
     
    Nobody likes this.
  2. qak

    qak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jun, 2017
    Posts:
    1,685
    Location:
    Sydney
    Oh yes I agree.

    Governments need to tackle tax reform. Probably needs to be agreement between the States & Cth to do this, there's too many taxes now.
     
  3. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,672
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    John_BridgeToBricks and qak like this.
  4. Illusivedreams

    Illusivedreams Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    3rd Oct, 2017
    Posts:
    2,457
    Location:
    Sydney

    • Overseas migration 2022-23 – net annual gain of 518,000 people
    500k+ Net positive in 22 This is huge amount of post covid migrant in 1 year.

    Further even 210k per year if we are not building this much maybe need to be moderated. Infra and housing go hand in hand and need to be delt with.







    '
     
    craigc and John_BridgeToBricks like this.
  5. strannik

    strannik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Oct, 2022
    Posts:
    1,625
    Location:
    Brisbane
    it says right on the bottom of that page:

     
  6. PropIn19

    PropIn19 Member

    Joined:
    29th May, 2022
    Posts:
    18
    Location:
    2155
    Not really sure about all, but one of my colleagues (in Sydney) said that the house next door to hers is housing 6 couples (meaning 12 people). It's a 4 bedroom house. So people are living in sharehouses for sure. Housing crisis is real and not a sham
     
  7. Poppy

    Poppy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    7th Jul, 2017
    Posts:
    202
    Location:
    Sydney
    oh but there is. The government just don’t want you to see the evidence.
    Midwives doing 8 births per shift instead of 4, Teachers will full classes in demountables, Families driving two hours to work and school drop because they’re living in areas without schools or transport, roads absolutely clogged,

    even in 2005 there were times Sydney’s town hall looked like Tokyo you couldn’t even get on a platform for 15 min let alone a train. Over capacity.

    this is just the tip of the iceberg…we COULD have the infrastructure…. but we DONT.

    the cheapest laziest way for each government is to get in migrants to pay the 10 billion welfare/defence bill instead of investing in our own people (all without a cent on infra or housing)
     
    marty998, SeafordSunshine and qak like this.
  8. John_BridgeToBricks

    John_BridgeToBricks Buyer's Agent Business Member

    Joined:
    25th May, 2018
    Posts:
    2,435
    Location:
    Sydney
    We have big welfare systems. It's easier to import a tax payer than to grow one.

    Also in a world where "GDP" is the main economic measure, more people means more GDP. Governments don't care if we are getting wealthier or poorer. It's all about "total spending".

    I really think this bi-partisan pursuit of unbridled immigration is very easy to understand.
     
  9. Antoni0

    Antoni0 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6th Jul, 2017
    Posts:
    1,826
    Location:
    Birisbane
    The elephant in the room is an aging population.

    upload_2024-4-24_15-7-50.png
     
    qak and John_BridgeToBricks like this.
  10. igor1234

    igor1234 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Sep, 2016
    Posts:
    1,711
    Location:
    sydney
    exactly right. and the main number is we bringing just as many as we did before covid. it just came as "massive wave" because year before was basically zero. so if i were gov, i would see no issue what so ever.