Would you gamble on this ?

Discussion in 'Investor Psychology & Mindset' started by Ace in the Hole, 31st Jul, 2015.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
?

Would you stake $1,000 of real money right now for this opportunity?

  1. No.

    30 vote(s)
    61.2%
  2. Yes.

    19 vote(s)
    38.8%
  1. Ace in the Hole

    Ace in the Hole Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,874
    Location:
    Sydney
    How does that explain that more people were willing to bet on the option with less chance of a return of capital?
    The expected positive return was the same for both samples.
     
  2. sanj

    sanj Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,471
    Location:
    Perth
    U might be reading too much into an entirely hypothetical and slightly pointless discussion imo
     
  3. vbplease

    vbplease Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,575
    Location:
    Brisbane
    I wouldn't do it even if I had 3 x flips.

    The thought of losing money on something I have zero control over frustrates me too much.. even on 3 flips there is a 26% chance of losing money..
     
  4. Ace in the Hole

    Ace in the Hole Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,874
    Location:
    Sydney
    That is correct and true.
    As you can see, the more flips you take, the lower your chances of losing.
    And as you would know, your chance of a complete wipe out is only 3.69% with 3 flips.

    How many flips would make you comfortable to play?
     
  5. Sackie

    Sackie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    25,058
    Location:
    Vaucluse, Sydney.
    If I was allowed to incorporate a martingale system in all this, man I would be there right now with 20k ready to go. (200 was a typo)
     
    Last edited: 13th Aug, 2015
  6. Ace in the Hole

    Ace in the Hole Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,874
    Location:
    Sydney
    Anti-Martingale would produce better returns provided you have a reasonable stop-gain point.

    Actually, flat stakes is probably the best for consistency.
    Any method that can get as much action down as possible, while minimizing wild swings/bankroll fluctuation, would be the best strategy.
     
    Sackie likes this.
  7. Sackie

    Sackie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    25,058
    Location:
    Vaucluse, Sydney.
    hmm good point. but with only a 3.69% chance of wiping out after 3 goes... I was thinking there might be room to use the Martingale method at least short term in order to further reduce your chance of losing capital...?


    edit: I was just thinking, with only 3.69% after three turns to lose.... really medium to long terms its going to be very, very hard to lose money and not make money...or am I missing something..
     
  8. Ace in the Hole

    Ace in the Hole Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,874
    Location:
    Sydney
    Martingale doesn't change the odds though, so chance of a wipeout after 3 goes is the same regardless of which betting progression/regression you choose.
    It would also amplify your losses exponentially when that wipeout does occur.
    The best strategy would depend on how may goes you get to have.

    If for example, you could have unlimited goes, you could bet a percentage of your bankroll.
    The chance of losing 5 times in a row is less than 1/2 of one percent..
    You'd be very extremely safe betting 10% of your bankroll and you'll never be wiped out.
    As your bankroll grows, so does your 10% stake.
     
  9. Sackie

    Sackie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    25,058
    Location:
    Vaucluse, Sydney.
    yep makes sense.

    Sign me up asap :D