Why would an investor buy a property for $$$ and rent it for $ ?

Discussion in 'Investment Strategy' started by JVG123456, 19th Jan, 2021.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. JVG123456

    JVG123456 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    12th Dec, 2020
    Posts:
    51
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I'm not sure if this is a negative gearing thing or what, but I'm interested in understanding the economics involved when I see a property sell for $1.4m, and then go on the rental market for $500/wk, or similar.

    For a "normal" situation with a 20% deposit, mortgage would be like $3800/mo and rent would only take in $2000/mo. Why would someone do this?

    My uneducated guesses are:

    - Owner has a large portion of the mortgage paid off so their repayments are very low, any rent is bonus, and lets them sit on the property for a few years in hopes of selling for a big windfall

    - There is some sort of tax benefit (negative gearing? I'm not really sure how it works)

    - Investor wants to own the worst house on the best street

    So yeah, how does it work?
     
  2. thatbum

    thatbum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,837
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    For a good investor, it will be purely because they have another strategy to make money from the property, that isn't just "rental income".
     
  3. Trainee

    Trainee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th May, 2017
    Posts:
    10,327
    Location:
    Australia
    So why would anyone buy shares that dont pay a dividend?

    Because the owner thinks property will appreciate by more than they lose. That may or may not happen.

    For a 1.4 property, say you lose 10 or 15 or 20k a year. If it goes up 5% a year, it goes up 70k the first year, and by the 14th year it goes up 140k a year.
     
  4. Lindsay_W

    Lindsay_W Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    5,058
    Location:
    QLD/Australia Wide
    Capital Growth > Cash Flow
     
  5. Sackie

    Sackie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    25,058
    Location:
    Vaucluse, Sydney.
    There are only a few reasons why as an investor I might do this.

    1. Is if the land has development ability and it's bought with the short-term NCF in mind as an overall business cost once the development is sold. This way it can be justified.

    2. Is if I expect the area to have massive growth over the next few years to justify the NCF. This is pretty much crystal ball stuff which I mostly stay away from.

    Many people accept some modest NCF in the hopes their DD works out and their area grows. But once you are talking about massive short falls in cashflow each week, to just hope your area grows is simply high risk and generally not sustainable for most. And it's not something which makes sense to me for the vast majority of investors.
     
  6. skater

    skater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,259
    Location:
    Sydney? Gold Coast?
    This!

    There are many ways to make money from Real Estate.
     

Build Passive Income WITHOUT Dropping $15K On Buyers Agents Each Time! Helping People Achieve PASSIVE INCOME Using Our Unique Data-Driven System, So You Can Confidently Buy Top 5% Growth & Cashflow Property, Anywhere In Australia