Why are units in blue chip areas more vulnerable?

Discussion in 'Property Market Economics' started by TMNT, 30th Sep, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. TMNT

    TMNT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    5,572
    Location:
    Melbourne
    The Melbourne postcodes vulnerable to further significant price falls

    can anyone explain, why units in a blue chip area would be more vulnerable than anything else?

    apartments, I understand,
    docklands apartments, I understand,
    but units in Toorak, I cant understand

    to me I would have thought, blue chip, moderate land component, well below the median ,would be one of the safest investments for Resi
     
  2. dabbler

    dabbler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,572
    Location:
    Sid en e - olympic city
    How many and how do they val....

    It wont matter where it is if there is excess supply....
     
  3. MTR

    MTR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,859
    Location:
    My World
    Oversupply, too much of same product on market..... so how low can it ho

    The period/art deco units in smaller blocks not as volnerable, as stated in the link because these are rare
     
  4. Tattler

    Tattler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,067
    Location:
    Sydney
    But units and apartments are completely different things in Victoria. Units at Melbourne (and also Adelaide) are equivalent to villas in Sydney so oversupply should not be a major factor.

    The only reason I can see is that the unit prices overshot during the peak and now with prices dropping around it people may ended up buying houses further out than units in the blue-chip suburbs.
     
  5. marmot

    marmot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jan, 2018
    Posts:
    1,215
    Location:
    N.S.W , W.A
    Maybe everyone overpaid for units in some areas just based on the name of the suburb .
    For families or couples wanting to start a family, a house is always going to be more desirable and what's really driving the market at the moment.
    Investors, upgraders or FHBs.
     
    johnmteliza likes this.
  6. jazzsidana

    jazzsidana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    27th Jan, 2018
    Posts:
    459
    Location:
    Melbourne

    Depends upon the unit block size and appeal it has!!..

    Being Toorak doesn't mean they aren't vulnerable..
     
  7. TMNT

    TMNT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    5,572
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Of course. The fundamentals stilll apply.
    Just can't see the logic as to why too too rak would be the highest risk category
    It's just as blue chip as you can get

    In my mind if units in Toorak were struggling, then units in other suburbs would be collapsing
     
  8. DrunkSailor

    DrunkSailor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2017
    Posts:
    756
    Location:
    Melbourne

    Harry Dents explanation is that these areas experienced the most growth so they experience the most falls.

    According to the article, St Kilda houses are down 27%??? How has that not been all over the news.
     
  9. marmot

    marmot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jan, 2018
    Posts:
    1,215
    Location:
    N.S.W , W.A
    If everyone has had to take a haircut when it comes down to the amount they can borrow then they just move down a level to a slightly cheaper suburb.
    The most expensive suburbs are a bit exposed .
    Houses in that area might ? be less affected because the owners are generally very very wealthy, whilst the apartment owners are a lot further down the list and require bank finance.
    Very wealthy people that want to live in large homes with indoor pools ,tennis courts etc will also just live in other areas ,and not necessary in units/apartment and terraced houses.
     
    Last edited: 30th Sep, 2018