Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community

What would you budget as a % for fees and costs of owning an IP?

Discussion in 'General Property Chat' started by Dan Donoghue, 18th Aug, 2016.

Tags:
  1. Dan Donoghue

    Dan Donoghue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Sydney, NSW
    So as many of you know, I am so so close now to getting out the starting blocks (3 weeks yesterday till i'm fixed and then it's no holds barred).

    As most of you also probably know I have been playing around in Excel for a VERY long time building a model I can use for investment analysis.

    I have set it up so I can plug in certain variables and see it change instantly. For example:

    I have my yield set to 4.55%, my tax set to 33% and my costs set to 17.5%.

    This is where I get confused. I mean my yield I manipulate to see what yield I "need" to get my figures around where I want them so i understand that and my tax.... well not much I can do about that but my costs. This is to show the cost of a PM, repairs, vacated periods and any other fees that come with owning an IP.

    The problem is I don't and have never owned an IP so I am sort of pulling that number out of my bum.

    For those of you who have done similar analysis. What is a percentage that you generally deem as an acceptable amount to budget for the cost of owning an IP?

    Once I have this I think I have the full picture, I might upload a copy of my model and get you guys to check it out for me, always good to have experienced eyes cast over things like this.
     
  2. bob shovel

    bob shovel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,381
    Location:
    Somewhere in the land of Oz
  3. D.T.

    D.T. Adelaide Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    13th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,594
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
    25 - 30% costs, excluding interest
     
    Dan Donoghue likes this.
  4. Dan Donoghue

    Dan Donoghue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Sydney, NSW
    Bugger, I under budgeted quite a bit there.

    @30% it pushes my yield out to 6%, too high, I may need to scale back my operation a little.

    If I knock the value back and increase the number I can balance a 5% yield with 30% for associated costs.

    Basically what I am trying to use as my boundary is we currently pay $3,200 more than the scheduled payment of our mortgage (Goes into an offset account then the scheduled payment is drawn from this) I am trying to do the maximum investment without having to kick in more than that magic $3,200 a month.

    Alternatively, if I kick in a little bit more (pushing the $3,200 to $5,000 which is easily doable) I can stick with my original plan and balance out a bit with a range of values and keep the yield at 4.4% which in my mind is much more achievable.

    As usual, I walk away from here feeling more knowledgeable but with more questions lol.

    Thanks for your help guys :).
     
  5. Barny

    Barny Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    1,180
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Near 20% for new build houses. 30% for houses slightly older up to 20 years old.
    I have ranged this over 4 investment houses in different states and I usually stick to 30%.

    Works like this.

    Say you rent for 300/week. 300x52=15600-30%=10920 clear.
    This takes all costs, agent fees, vacancy, repairs, insurances, rates etc etc.
     
    Dan Donoghue likes this.
  6. joel

    joel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    784
    Location:
    Adelaide
    6% yield usually equates to a neutrally geared property, give or take
     
    Dan Donoghue likes this.
  7. Dan Donoghue

    Dan Donoghue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Sydney, NSW
    And with regards to tax on the rent (as it's an income). Is it calculated at the end of the year and paid then or does it get paid by the agent who gets the rent?

    Do I pay tax on the Gross or the Nett rent?

    For example. Fred pays me $100 in rent. I pay 33% tax, and 30% in associated costs. Do I pay 30% in my costs first then 33% tax on the remaining 70% ie $23.1 OR do I pay $30 in costs, $33 in tax and end up with $37 towards the IO loan?
     
  8. eskander

    eskander Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    31st Dec, 2015
    Posts:
    75
    Location:
    NSW » Central Coast
    All your costs inc interest come out before you pay any tax. Then if there's a profit you pay tax, if there's a loss you claim a loss and have a tax refund. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong anyone :)
     
    Dan Donoghue and hash_investor like this.
  9. Colin Rice

    Colin Rice Mortgage Broker Australia Wide Business Member

    Joined:
    9th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,078
    Location:
    Perth
    Banks use a benchmark of 20% as they shade rental income at 80% of actual rent collected.

    So suggestions of between 20-30% is reasonable.
     
    Dan Donoghue likes this.
  10. JacM

    JacM VIC Buyer's Agent Business Member

    Joined:
    12th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,115
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Depends on how hefty insurance and council rates are, but generally 30% is a very comfortable figure that factors in all your bills, 2 week per annum vacancy, and 3% maintenance.
     
    Dan Donoghue and Colin Rice like this.
  11. Dan Donoghue

    Dan Donoghue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Sydney, NSW
    Thanks guys, the tax info has brought my figures back to my desired benchmark, if I can achieve 5% yield on the number and value of properties I want, it will cost me $73.65 per month more than I am currently paying :).

    Now to start modeling the impact of increase payments to see when that will allow for further purchases without an impact :).
     
    eskander likes this.