ETF VAS reduce MER to 0.10%

Discussion in 'Shares & Funds' started by Zenith Chaos, 25th Jun, 2019.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Zenith Chaos

    Zenith Chaos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Sydney
    Good move and about time considering A200.
     
    number 5, sharon, Burgs and 6 others like this.
  2. oracle

    oracle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,461
    Location:
    Canberra
    Still high in my opinion. Won’t be happy till fees are half of 0.1%

    Don’t think I am asking for too much, am I ? :D

    Cheers
    Oracle
     
    orangestreet and ChrisP73 like this.
  3. wombat777

    wombat777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,565
    Location:
    On a Capital and Income Growth Safari
    Now for direct investment super firms to do the same. They price-gouge.
     
  4. oracle

    oracle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,461
    Location:
    Canberra
    From AFR

    Vanguard third most expensive after A200 and IOZ. Not good enough.They were forced to cut by the other two. Vanguard lately is not setting the trend but rather following others.

    Cheers
    Oracle
     
  5. Momentum

    Momentum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    1,123
    Location:
    Collins St, Melbourne
    Rather happy with this one. I have about 25% of my SMSF parked in VAS and I was kinda toying with the idea of switching it to A200 as their management fees were literally half. But now that Vanguard have cut their prices, I'm a happy camper and I think I'll stick with them.
     
    Terry_w, bobbyj and Redwing like this.
  6. bobbyj

    bobbyj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    350
    Location:
    Sydney
    As long as VAS follows then it’s all good
     
  7. Zenith Chaos

    Zenith Chaos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Sydney
    I agree - Vanguard are only doing this to remain competitive. Vanguard Australia, a for profit company, is riding the global brand's reputation as one of the lowest fee ETF providers, being a not for profit, to acquire customers.

    I'd like to see a fee decrease across all of Vanguard's products.
     
    BPhil, jimmy, Redwing and 2 others like this.
  8. Snowball

    Snowball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Dec, 2016
    Posts:
    843
    Location:
    Perth
    I think the implication that Vanguard is being stingy/greedy/whatever is a little rich.

    In any case, when we’re each quibbling over a few basis points we’ve already hit the farking jackpot, in terms of our position in the world as humans, in global terms and compared to history.

    Context is important. If these are our complaints, how lucky are we!
     
    marty998, Nodrog, number 5 and 2 others like this.
  9. geoffw

    geoffw Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    15th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,677
    Location:
    Newcastle
    I agree.

    Compared to the fees for managed funds before Vanguard came along (1% - 2%), and compared to the daily, even hourly, movements in the VAS price, it's nothing.
     
  10. Blueskies

    Blueskies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    1,769
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Disagree.

    In the words of C. Montgomery Burns - "I'm a rich man, but I'd trade it all for a little more... "
     
    BPhil and Froxy like this.
  11. Zenith Chaos

    Zenith Chaos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Sydney
    This is the "Not as bad as" fallacy Not as bad as - RationalWiki

    Yes, the MER was worse in the past, but it could be better. The proof is in ETFs such as A200 that proves ASX200 can be done cheaper, and VTS that proves large sets of holdings (~3500) can be done cheaper.

    Call me greedy, but 1 > 0 and so is 1000000000001 > 1000000000000

    It's not as bad as the super industry and I will continue to buy Vanguard ETFs.
     
    dunno and Blueskies like this.
  12. Blueskies

    Blueskies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    1,769
    Location:
    Brisbane
    That is a great article, well worth a read. Loved this cartoon on the page too...
    People_Have_It_Worse_Than_You_SMBC.gif
     
    Zenith Chaos likes this.
  13. Synergy

    Synergy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6th Jun, 2019
    Posts:
    164
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Sticking to a200, everyone defends vas with the extra 100 companies but it doesnt help

    [​IMG]
     
    sharon likes this.
  14. Redwing

    Redwing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,488
    Location:
    WA
    @Synergy didn't Betashares A200 only list in 2018?

    10 Year ann returns?

    But you are right ASX200 vs ASX300 not too much difference

    VAS tracks the S&P/ASX 300 index and both STW and IOZ track the S&P/ASX 200 index. A200 tracks a newly created index, the Solactive Australia 200 Index. Solactive is a Frankfurt-based index provider

    Solactive state that inn terms of differences, they are operating with a buffer rule where they say stocks can only get kicked out at the quarterly re-balancing if they fall out of the top 225 largest companies. They’ve done this to reduce turnover. They also have an additional liquidity filter where they only accept stocks that have $100,000 average daily trading volume.
     
    Zenith Chaos and Burgs like this.
  15. Zenith Chaos

    Zenith Chaos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Sydney
    That probably explains the variations between VAS and A200. Did they release the calculations showing how their algorithm impacts performance? Because I assume they've done backtested calculations to show that the error in the algorthim is significantly (orders of magnitude) less than the MER of 0.07%.

    Isn't the minimal difference between capital weighted asx 200 and 300 because those 100 companies make up such an insignificant part of the invested money? For example an equally weighted asx 200 vs 300 should have much more variance.

    I also have the equal weighted MVW (MER 0.35%) that has outperformed but I'm not sure it's not just an anomaly over a short period.
     
  16. oracle

    oracle Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,461
    Location:
    Canberra
    Good start to the day feeling ever so slightly rich knowing from today I get to keep 0.04% extra on my VAS portfolio. Feeling good :D

    Cheers
    Oracle
     
  17. geoffw

    geoffw Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    15th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,677
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Don't forget that you have to wait a year to get the full benefit of that .04%. Today you get around .00011%.
     
    Zenith Chaos likes this.
  18. pippen

    pippen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Aug, 2016
    Posts:
    1,429
    Location:
    australia
    Vangurd wont budge on wholesale fees stil set at .18 per annum
     
  19. SatayKing

    SatayKing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Sep, 2017
    Posts:
    10,781
    Location:
    Extended Sabatical
    Spend it wisely. Or buy more. You can afford it.
     
    oracle likes this.
  20. LeeM

    LeeM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Sep, 2018
    Posts:
    120
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    Hi all, I'm newbie here. Sorry to ask very basic questions here, but I don't really know where to post it. I'm about to open a Vangaurd account, and I'm not sure if I should do it in in "individual name" or a "company name" or a "sole trader" account? What are the benefits or disadvantages of these? And are there minimum amount required for trading on this? Since this is my first time in doing this, I just want to start with a bare minimum to learn the rob first.
    Please direct me to other posts/threads about this if that helps. thanks