Tenants in Common - CGT when splitting the land between tenants in common)

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by NCW1, 27th Dec, 2021.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. NCW1

    NCW1 New Member

    Joined:
    27th Dec, 2021
    Posts:
    1
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Hi all,

    Is it possible to restructure landholdings without triggering a CGT event? The context is a large block of land (over 3 titles). 2 people are tenants in common on each title. One of these titles has a house, the other 2 are vacant land. The land isn't being sold, but 1 of the people on title would like to move into the existing house, the other would like to build a new house on one of the parcels of vacant land. They'd like to both be the sole proprietor of the their own title, rather than remain tenants in common on all of them. Is it possible to do this without triggering CGT?

    Is there any ability to transfer the land within a family? or will this be treated by the ATO as the same as a sale?

    Thanks for reading,
     
  2. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,223
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    You may need to stump up for Stamp Duty & CGT unless you can prove a trust relationship or have a deed of partition to indicate that subdivision was the explicit intention of the 3 owners.
     
  3. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,917
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Generally not unless partitioned and held as trustee
     
    Last edited by a moderator: 27th Dec, 2021
    Mike A likes this.
  4. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    it should have been structured differently on purchase..now it is going to have CGT and stamp duty issues
     
  5. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,504
    Location:
    Sydney
    Could even be a GST issue since partitioning is a potentially taxable supply and the intentions of the buyers of the vacant portion may impact this for all the land.
    Its an area where complex (and costly) legal advice would be wise - In your state from a proficient duties adviser. The legal fee cost may address some tax costs.
     
  6. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    some very limited facts from the OP but if the original intention was for a long term hold and they are aligning the interests to how they wanted things to be initially then GST generally wouldnt apply.
     
  7. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,504
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yes...But a change of intention ? Breaking apart long term things aftre 20 years tend to look different to the past 20 years. And can be problematic to satisfy OSR etc. Definately one for a duties legal specialist