Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community

Tax Tip 73: Multiple Offset Accounts and some Tax Issues

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Terry_w, 30th Oct, 2015.

  1. Terry_w

    Terry_w Structuring Lawyer and Finance Broker - all states Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,739
    Location:
    Remote
    Generally it would be better to have the offset account attached to the main residence. This is because the main residence loan is not deductible. The interest on a non deductible loan costs you much more as you must pay for it with after tax dollars..

    Some people feel a need to have a separate offset account for each investment property. There is no need for this from a tax point of view. In fact it will be detrimental to the borrower as they will end up paying more tax if these accounts are attached to the investment properties and they will be diverting funds from paying off the non deductible debt sooner.

    Others like to segregate cash into different accounts as a savings strategy. This can be a good idea, but where these accounts are not offset accounts you will be losing interest savings. Some banks allow multiple offsets on the one loan, others don’t. Where your lender doesn’t it may be possible to use just 1 offset and maintain a spreadsheet to track what the cash in the offset is for - holiday, savings, retirement etc.

    Where the main residence loan is paid off then there should be an offset on at least one IP loan - you have to get your wages and rents paid somewhere so might as well maximise interest savings by using an offset account.

    But where there are several IP loans and where these are at different banks it may be good if you have the ability to add offset accounts to these as recently there have been lots of changes with interest rates. It would be best to have the offset on the loan with the highest rate. As rates change the money in the offset can be moved around to save the most interest.

    And where the properties have different ownership structures - joint, single etc the money in the offset can be moved around to take advantage of maximising deductions for the higher income earner while maximising income for the lower income earner.

    For example
    A is on the top rate of tax and B is not working and has no income. They have $100,000 in cash and a main residence fully paid off. They also have one investment property each. If the $100,000 is placed in the offset account against A’s investment property then A will pay about $5,000 less in interest per year. That is the same as earning $5,000 in extra income. He will then pay 47% of this in tax of $2,350. Whereas if the $100,000 is parked in the offset account against B’s loan then B will save about $5,000 in interest and have a $5,000 boost in income. But because B’s taxable income is under $20,000 no extra tax would be payable. This is a $2,350 per year saving for the family.

    But wait - don’t do this without careful consideration and advice. You need to consider the legal implications, who the money belongs to, asset protection and other potential strategies such as the spousal loan strategy. Pooling money together can be good or it can be better to keep finances separate
     
    Mac Fields and S0805 like this.
  2. Bookle

    Bookle Member

    Joined:
    5th Dec, 2015
    Posts:
    9
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Hi Terry, this sounds like the correct thread to ask this question. If you could kindly share your knowledge.

    Scenario:
    630k PPOR previously unencumbered - 500k equity released as I/O SVR loan with 100% offset.

    IP1 (bought last year)
    260k from equity release loan used for 20% + Acquisition costs.
    Ownership - 100% me (higher tax bracket)

    IP2 (buying in next 6 months)
    20% + Acquisition costs again to be obtained from equity release.
    Ownership - 100% partner (lower tax bracket)

    We have about $300k in private cash sitting in an offset against IP1's 80% main loan (also I/O SVR 100% offset). This helps reduce my interest repayments but technically not that ideal since I'm in a higher tax bracket.

    Since each property will have a different owner, I wanted to split the equity release loan so that interest deductibility can be tracked between IP1 (mine) IP2 (partner's). Turned out you can't do that (with CBA anyway) without triggering a loan application with loss of our previous lender's discount.

    Question:
    I don't want to split the loan and lose my lender's discount. The lender we use allows multiple offset accounts against the same loan. I plan to add another offset account to the equity release loan so that 1 offset contains the $240k remaining borrowed funds in it. And the other offset sits at $0.

    The $240k offset will then be used as downpayment (& acquisition cost) for IP2 (estimated to be $150k) - this will technically be deductible against my partner's income. However, the moment this happens, I plan to create a 3rd offset so as to quarantine the remaining borrowed funds (~$90k).

    I'll then completely fill up the empty $150k offset (IP2) with private cash so that my partner incurs no interest on the equity release loan. This will increase IP1's interest repayments against my income (I am in a higher bracket) because $150k of private cash will no longer be offsetting IP1's 80% main loan.

    Main concern is - will I be mixing borrowed funds (in the 3rd 'quarantined' offset) with private funds in the $150k offset? It feels like I'm not because the offsets are separate, however they are still collectively offsetting the same loan.

    Any other ways I can approach this?
     
  3. Terry_w

    Terry_w Structuring Lawyer and Finance Broker - all states Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,739
    Location:
    Remote
    Sounds messy and dangerous. You will be borrowing money parking in an offset and then lending this money to someone else to park in a different offset and possibly mixing.

    My advice is not to do this and to seek tax and legal advice
     
  4. Paul@PFI

    Paul@PFI Tax Accounting + SMSF Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,023
    Location:
    Sydney
    Lending money to someone may mean you have assessable interest income and they have no deductible purpose....Get advice. Clever ideas often arent that clever. Possibly a Part IVA scheme too if there is any tax benefit somewhere
     
  5. Bookle

    Bookle Member

    Joined:
    5th Dec, 2015
    Posts:
    9
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Thanks for your advice, Terry.

    Turns out I actually CAN split my loan without any penalties. Sorted within 3 days. Had another broker do it for us, we're firing the old broker who obviously doesn't have his clients' best interest at heart.

    Thanks again!
     
    Terry_w likes this.