NSW Sydney House with history of significant fire damage

Discussion in 'Property Analysis' started by Mr Investor, 2nd Sep, 2019.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Mr Investor

    Mr Investor Member

    Joined:
    2nd Sep, 2019
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Sydney
    I inspected a house in Sydney, for Investment purpose, this house had a major fire 9 years ago. The owner got the house fixed but no reports/ any paper work is available as the work was carried out by his builder friends. The owner has passed away few years ago and the property is inhabited by his wife currently. As per the agent, only timber floor and outside walls are original rest all was changed after fire The outside walls are original brick but rendered to hide the black fire marks. I noticed two cracks on one side wall in the bottom section, not sure if they show structure problem.
    The agents story is that the owner didn’t have insurance at the time of fire so his friends helped in fixing the house, who were legit builders. But, since all was informally done there are no reports available to say that everything was done up to standards.

    Somehow this property is not generating much interest in market in spite of being in good location as comparing with other properties sold recently in vicinity. I am not sure what’s the implication of fire and why it is not getting much traction? If I think to move forward, what all checks shall I get done apart from normal building/pest inspection given the history of fire 9 years ago. Are there any long term problems for such a house?
     
  2. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,248
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Did they submit any approvals to council for the repairs (if it was structural works then there would have been a DA/CC or CDA)?
     
  3. Mr Investor

    Mr Investor Member

    Joined:
    2nd Sep, 2019
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Sydney
    According to agent, no changes were done to outside structure - so DA was not needed
     
  4. datto

    datto Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,675
    Location:
    Mt Druuiitt
    I'd get a building report before deciding.
     
  5. Propertunity

    Propertunity Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,476
    Location:
    NSW
    If the building report that you commission, is OK, then the only thing will be that this issue will come up again when (if) you come to sell in the future.
     
  6. Mr Investor

    Mr Investor Member

    Joined:
    2nd Sep, 2019
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks..that I am planning to do anyways for any property purchase
     
    datto likes this.
  7. Mr Investor

    Mr Investor Member

    Joined:
    2nd Sep, 2019
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Sydney
    Exactly that’s what I suspected that I will face similar difficulty in future when I will be selling
     
  8. Trainee

    Trainee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th May, 2017
    Posts:
    10,346
    Location:
    Australia
    If structurally sound, buy it cheap enough, hold long enough for it to be a building site?
     
  9. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,653
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    I have had clients turn down a property that was fixed up fine, clear report etc once they did the DD on the place, the risk outweighed the lower price

    Bit of a tattoo in todays world of the internet

    ta
    rolf
     
  10. Mr Investor

    Mr Investor Member

    Joined:
    2nd Sep, 2019
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Sydney
    I agree. Especially given I am not planning to knock it down in future, probably not worth
     
  11. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,536
    Location:
    Sydney
    In NSW thats not correct. Non-structural is also affected. The house loses its occupancy certificate when it is significantly damaged or destroyed requiring new works that must be certified and new DA and new occ certificate to comply with present standards is required. If it was a bushfire affected property it may even have been unable to be rebuilt without major changes. This is a common issue in some areas eg Winmalee / Springwood NSW

    What does the local council say ? Ask them for free without disclosing actual address. If they say a DA would have been needed it may answer the question in the eyes of the relevant council. You could buy a problem and inherit a demolition.
     
  12. Mr Investor

    Mr Investor Member

    Joined:
    2nd Sep, 2019
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Sydney
    You may be correct, Paul that property losing its occupancy certificate. Local council was clear that if no structural changes (?) then no need to get council approval but I understand that’s a grey area. This property got fire (as per what I have been told) due one of the down lights in hall