Subdivision of a smsf property

Discussion in 'Superannuation, SMSF & Personal Insurance' started by Shane Wells, 9th Feb, 2020.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Shane Wells

    Shane Wells New Member

    Joined:
    9th Feb, 2020
    Posts:
    1
    Location:
    Australia
    Hi, would like to buy a business property with smsf and limited recourse borrowing. The property has too much land and would like to subdivide, which would offset most of the borrowing
    It is not clear to me whether this would comply with the borrowing rules.
    Any help would be appreciated
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,932
    Location:
    Australia wide
    While there is a loan in place the nature of the property cannot be changed - subdivision would fall into this category.

    You should seek legal advice from specialist SMSF lawyers on this. Depending on your circumstances there may be a way around this such as buying it outside of super and subdividing and then selling to a SMSF Trustee
     
    Archaon and ellejay like this.
  3. Redwood

    Redwood Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    691
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Hi there

    Based on the above - the answer will be NO unfortunately. The arrange must comply with the single acquirable asset test under s67, this will not.

    Cheers
     
    Archaon and Paul@PAS like this.
  4. Richard Taylor

    Richard Taylor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    434
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Do you have funds to complete the subdivision?

    If so there maybe a way to achieve this and still comply under s67.
     
  5. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,504
    Location:
    Sydney
    The single acquirable asset rule is the legal concern here (s67A). When you subdivide you create two assets (s67B) and the replacement asset rules doesnt allow land since s67A(3) has two limbs and while its possible they may be excactly the same value they will fail the other limb as they cannot be identical. Land cant be homogenous like for example two CBA shares may.

    If partitioned on acquisition there may be two bare trusts but the complexities around a mortgage may be insurmountable. Esp with the small panel of lenders in the space. They want vanilla. I would seek high level smsf legal advice eg DBA Law
     
    Archaon likes this.

Build Passive Income WITHOUT Dropping $15K On Buyers Agents Each Time! Helping People Achieve PASSIVE INCOME Using Our Unique Data-Driven System, So You Can Confidently Buy Top 5% Growth & Cashflow Property, Anywhere In Australia