Split loan between members of a couple

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by legallyblonde, 10th Oct, 2015.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. legallyblonde

    legallyblonde Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    858
    Location:
    TAS
    A friend of mine recently bought a PPOR with her new boyfriend.... Apparently they have structured the loan is such a way that they are only liable for half the loan each... E.g 500k house.... 20% deposit... then they each have a separate mortgage with the same lender for 200k each. Whilst I am familiar with the concept of split loans I had never heard of splitting a loan between two people like that.

    My question is... Is this possible? I ask in the context that I know the usual situation is both my friend and her BF's borrowing power would be stuffed up because only half of the asset is theirs but they are liable for the full debt? Is this a way around that?

    Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,932
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Depends on the situation. All owners will need to guarantee the loan or be on the loan.

    So if only one is legal owner of the property it would be possible. If both are legal owners it would not be possible. But It would be possible for one to be on the loan if the other owner gives a guarantee.

    Legally it is possible for a tenant in common to mortgage their share of the property, but there are no lenders willing to lend on this basis - that I have ever seen.
     
  3. Jess Peletier

    Jess Peletier Mortgage Broker & Finance Strategy, Aus Wide! Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,684
    Location:
    Perth WA + Buderim Qld
    CBA had a loan that does this, however bc both parties are guarantor for the other party of the loan it still stuffs up their future borrowing.
     
  4. Nemo

    Nemo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    265
    Location:
    Somewhere
    @Corey Batt organised something like this for me through the commonwealth bank earlier this year.

    We had to be guarantors on each other's loans.

    I liked the way it was setup.
     
    legallyblonde likes this.
  5. herenow

    herenow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    77
    Location:
    SA
    What's the attraction of a loan set up this way for partners in a relationship?
     
  6. Nemo

    Nemo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    265
    Location:
    Somewhere
    For me it was the ability to control my part of the loan.

    I had very different investment ideas to my husband... Having a joint loan limited me severely in investing on my own - joint and severally liable.

    While the separate loans didn't eliminate this, it allowed me to put more money towards eliminating the joint debt, but paying it off my portion rather than a joint debt.
     
  7. D.T.

    D.T. Specialist Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    9,189
    Location:
    Adelaide and Gold Coast
    If one partner wants to invest and the other doesn't, they can use their portion to go do so.
     
  8. Gockie

    Gockie Life is good ☺️ Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,781
    Location:
    Sydney
    That's what I need!
     
  9. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,932
    Location:
    Australia wide
    They can also pay down their loan independantly of the other - different tax issues.
     
  10. Nemo

    Nemo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    265
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Gockie, it doesn't help with the joint and severally liable.

    My husband was very anti property and wouldn't let me access equity in our joint ppor - this didn't help with that either as he still needed to be guarantor.

    It allowed me to pay down my portion of non- deductible debt at a pace that suited me, potentially increasing my serviceability down the track.

    Our finances were very separate and it got to the point were there was resentment over one partner paying off joint debt and the other wanting to do something else with their money.

    This way we each had our own debt and it was up to us how fast we paid it off.
     
    Terry_w likes this.
  11. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,932
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Sounds like it was a good solution. I guess another benefit is that you can then access redraw on your loan without his approval or involvement and then use that to invest yourself.
     
    legallyblonde likes this.
  12. legallyblonde

    legallyblonde Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    858
    Location:
    TAS
    My friend was looking at buying a house in the near future, then along came a new man... Then they jumped in and bought a house very earlier in their relationship.. Hence the 50:50 separate mortgages. I am really glad they were wise to keep the finances reasonably separate given how new the relationship was.

    QUESTION: If there is a 20% why would the need to be liable for the other half? I assume it is to protect the bank in case ONE person defaults, so they can still take the asset?
     
  13. legallyblonde

    legallyblonde Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    858
    Location:
    TAS
    Bugger.. Protecting borrowing power was my main concern with the structure....
     
  14. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,932
    Location:
    Australia wide
  15. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,932
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Two reasons:
    Banks wouldn't like taking possession of half of the property.
    And the banks want as much protection that they can get.
     
    legallyblonde likes this.
  16. Gockie

    Gockie Life is good ☺️ Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,781
    Location:
    Sydney
    Well, my share of the ppor is worth about 500k but we have a joint loan. That loan is only 90k. So it would have been nice to have the option to pay it down at my pace...
     
  17. legallyblonde

    legallyblonde Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    858
    Location:
    TAS
    Oh that is lame Gockie!! So you cannot use any of the equity without the other halves permission?
     
  18. Gockie

    Gockie Life is good ☺️ Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,781
    Location:
    Sydney
    Correct! And... forget asking for permission... he flat out will never let me...
     
  19. D.T.

    D.T. Specialist Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    9,189
    Location:
    Adelaide and Gold Coast
    I'd rather be single than have a partner who's not on the same page financially
     
    legallyblonde likes this.
  20. Nemo

    Nemo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    265
    Location:
    Somewhere
    I've had the same problem for the last 11 years. We've recently gone our separate ways.
     
    legallyblonde and Gockie like this.