Sell a commercial property or keep it?

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by shootingfish, 21st Aug, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. shootingfish

    shootingfish Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Apr, 2017
    Posts:
    53
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I have a small commercial ground floor retail/office shopfront on a busy street in Melbourne inner metro

    The loan is a tiny $280000 on it, currently rented below market at about $20000p/a and market rent is $35000.

    Value I've been told is $500-580k.

    If we're assuming rental yield 6-8% the above value is somewhat correct.

    We are developers and are generally pretty capital intensive - the property above is not cross collateralised.

    Should I just sell and get the profit and equity back about $200k after tax or just keep and get the 10% rental with new tenant? (I would be paying about $76000 tax)

    It's hard to use this building as equity as it's regarded as commercial and a real pain for valuations. Council valuation is $400k. Have used this for resi loans before and it's a headache with little equity gain.

    or is there another way to get an advantage with a loan on this?
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,942
    Location:
    Australia wide
    If you sold and had capital back could you make a better return?
     
  3. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,229
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Will you get $35k/yr+gst + outgoings (on a 3-5 year lease) if you leveraged the $200k?

    Would you qualify for the same loan if you didn't have the CIP?

    'It's a pain for valuations' - so you mean that you have to pay a valuer as it costs more than a couple of hundred dollars?

    I regularly have to commission vals which cost over $2k on land worth very little ie <$1000, however if I didn't (thus saving the community $100,000's) I could end up in gaol for not seeking the best outcome even though common sense tells you what it's worth.
     
    Last edited: 21st Aug, 2017
  4. Stoffo

    Stoffo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jul, 2016
    Posts:
    5,328
    Location:
    In the Tweed
    So essentially you have a cash cow :D

    I'd up the rent a reasonable amount to pay the principal down.

    The increase in income and reduction of loan principal should increase your serviceability for other projects :cool:

    By the time you sell and pay various costs and tax you'd have nearly $200k, not much for anything really :rolleyes:

    Unless you have a major project on the horizon that you require an injection of funds for, in that case sell ;)
     
    Scott No Mates likes this.
  5. albanga

    albanga Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,701
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Why is it 15k under market rent?
    How did that even happen? I see little way you could get the existent tenant to pay a whopping $288 weekly rental increase.
    You will likely need to vacate them and then get all the costs that come along with getting a new tenant.

    With that said it's an absolute cash cow. I wouldnt ever be selling something like that. What would you do with the 200k that could generate that kind of income?
     
  6. Corey Batt

    Corey Batt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,091
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
    Fix the rent situation, potentially release equity on the property up to ~75% LVR if your numbers stack up.

    In terms of selling vs keeping - balance out what happens in both scenarios and which gets your a better ROI - no point selling if long term the steady burn of the CIP works in your favour, OR if you can spin those funds a lot further with developing it may well be worth selling.