NSW San Souci price confusion

Discussion in 'Property Analysis' started by Zeee, 6th Jul, 2021.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Zeee

    Zeee New Member

    Joined:
    28th Nov, 2016
    Posts:
    3
    Location:
    NSW
    Hey guys,

    I've been spending hours trying to discern the reason why these two properties are virtually the same price. 1) virtually the same land size, 2) property 1 is closer to the water, 3) property 1 requires no renovation whilst property 2 either needs a major reno or knockdown rebuild

    https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-sans+souci-136221178

    https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-nsw-sans+souci-136510766

    Can anyone with more experience help me out with my way of thinking?
     
  2. Frenchie

    Frenchie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    12th Feb, 2020
    Posts:
    324
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Agent trying to bait people and then running a silent auction?
     
  3. Ace in the Hole

    Ace in the Hole Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,874
    Location:
    Sydney
    Virtually the same land size, but a small amount can make a big difference.
    To my knowledge, the older house can be redeveloped as a dual occupancy as it’s on more than 600m, but the newer house is under 600m.

    Also, the older house has already sold and the price of the newer house is still unknown and likely to go over the listed price.
     
    NG. likes this.
  4. Zeee

    Zeee New Member

    Joined:
    28th Nov, 2016
    Posts:
    3
    Location:
    NSW
    Thanks for the replies.

    i’ve been offered the house for 2.4m so no silent auction. The only thing I can decipher is that the street has a townhouse complex which may reduce its value.
     
  5. Ace in the Hole

    Ace in the Hole Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,874
    Location:
    Sydney
    Aspect would play a part too.
    The new house has all the living areas facing due south, so this would put many people off.
     
  6. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,245
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Quite the opposite, if the street is zoned for denser development, it'll push the price up (provided development stacks up).
     
  7. Piston_Broke

    Piston_Broke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    4,136
    Location:
    Margaritaville
    I'm confused as I see to different properties.
     
  8. Zeee

    Zeee New Member

    Joined:
    28th Nov, 2016
    Posts:
    3
    Location:
    NSW
    Thanks for the help guys.

    So looks like property 2 has a couple advantages: facing east (vs south) and 600m+ land which means it can be developed as a dual occupancy.
     
  9. Sydneyboy

    Sydneyboy Active Member

    Joined:
    8th Jul, 2018
    Posts:
    36
    Location:
    Sydney
    You may also want to consider the impact of the F6 if buying in that area. Last I checked, if they build the southern extension there may be a smoke stack fairly close to that newer house.

    Shame as I like that area but the F6 puts me off.
     
    NG. likes this.
  10. NG.

    NG. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    9th Nov, 2016
    Posts:
    150
    Location:
    Sydney 2219
    I live a stone throw away from each property

    the Brantwood St option is in far superior location. Wider street
    More single dwelling new builds too
    As others mentioned can have dual occ setup if required

    the house though is dated, new enough to not kdr but young enough for a decent freshen up. I heard a builder did buy it, so be interesting to see what happens.

    the newer property is closer to the proposed stack for the F6 also
     
    Stoffo likes this.