Retirement advice - sell IP's and what to do with proceeds?

Discussion in 'Share Investing Strategies, Theories & Education' started by daver, 19th Apr, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. orangestreet

    orangestreet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    419
    Location:
    Australia
    Don't disagree with the above at all. Spot on in fact.

    But as an aside, I did speak to a FP who looks after high net wealth individuals recently. His message to me (paraphrased to a great extent of course): if you continue to keep buying ARG, AFI, BKI, MLT when they are on discount and use conservative leverage where appropriate, you are doing fine without me.

    It was an initial conversation only. He made it very clear that anything he said was NOT advice. Same with my comments above, NOT advice. Do your own research and make your own decisions. I am not licenced to give advice.
     
    oracle, pippen, pwt and 2 others like this.
  2. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,225
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    I know F... All too. I met up with him and his partner last week for a drink ;)
     
  3. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,414
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    With the way Syria, Korea, USA, Russia, China, ... are behaving, I believe the world share markets are in for a rocky time over the next few years.

    There are bound to be bounce-downs and some people will panic. It has happened before and it will happen again.

    The GFC might become a "distant memory" but it will might replaced by something more recent.

    I know people who lived through the 1930's Great Depression and they are still scarred by it. And that is nearly 80 years ago.
     
    Redwing and The Y-man like this.
  4. truong

    truong Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    276
    Location:
    Everywhere
    As others have said, your parents’ retirement plan needs to consider a lot more than just the info you’ve posted. Many different scenarios can be suggested that may or may not suit them.

    OTOH you’re absolutely right in questioning the viability of their current setup. It does have a lot of weaknesses, just to say the obvious:

    - Lack of diversification: over $1M with just 2 assets providing big chunks of their income,
    - Milk bar premises probably in the high risk category, exposed to economic slowdowns, market changes, operator’s skills, extended loss of rent, maintenance costs due to age, etc…
    - High-rise apartment with low yield tending even lower and not keeping up with inflation,
    - No mention of a cash buffer or risk strategy.

    Good on you for asking questions that could lead to a comprehensive review.
     
  5. The Y-man

    The Y-man Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,500
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I guess this is where my wariness with LICs come in.

    If we took the 4 examples here - they are currently yielding 3.95%, 3.97%, 4.38%, 4.18% respectively - better than a bank deposit yes, but is it enough?

    More importantly when the "discount event" comes along, will people be brave enough to buy in? (as per above posts), and how long do they need to wait for the event to happen?

    Should retirees leverage? Probably not considering the returns are below prevailing margin rates, but then will the return be enough?

    FYI - the dividends were cut quite noticeably for ARG and MLT during the last "discount event" - 17% and 18% cut respectively - that can really hit a retiree hard. Granted AFI and BKI remained steady but for several years they paid dividends beyond their earnings - not good practice.

    The Y-man
     
    Barny, Redwing, Starbright and 3 others like this.
  6. daver

    daver Member

    Joined:
    30th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    19
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Thanks for the inputs. It's great to hear some different and interesting viewpoints. Don't worry they definitely won't be rushing into anything. Happy to share a little info to put into perspective,

    - Early 70's and plan to live at least another 20 years!
    - Own own home and no plans to downsize
    - No other debt, and no plans to take on any or leverage
    - Only small amount of other income from a part sibling ownership of a regional commercial (also used as milk bar!)
    - Like many Australians are about to lose part pension which will have a meaningful impact
    - Don't pay any tax as under threshold
    - Smallish buffer of 6-12 months income. Hard to foresee unexpected expenses
    - Lack of understanding/fear of other asset classes
    - In reality the extended loss of income would hurt a lot more than capital loss

    I agree their current structure clearly has weaknesses and the risks such as extended loss of rent in particular. I started explaining how LIC's spread their money/risks across over 100 of Australias largest companies rather than an individual property. But that they would have to accept the risks that in a GFC style event the share price could drop up to 50% but later recover, though their dividend income would likely only drop slightly.

    I realise that the sharemarket would only be suitable for them if they are able to cope with the increased capital risk/volatility, otherwise it would not be suitable for them. I think a bit of education might be really good for them here but unsure where to start. Maybe I should sign them up for a Peter Thornhill Class?
     
    Terry_w likes this.
  7. orangestreet

    orangestreet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    419
    Location:
    Australia
    That is why solely focusing on yield is a bad idea. I get much better yields than what you are quoting because I buy at better prices. Also, I buy these LICs because they have the ability to grow their dividends over the years.

    Enough for whom? We all have different requirements. Also, don't forget capital growth.

    Shares are not for everybody. If you are the type to buy high and sell low or don't have the temperament to purchase when markets are tanking, stay the hell away.

    I sure as hell did not advocate anybody (especially those retired) to leverage. Leverage could be used sensibly depending on your life stage. Also, there are other ways to use leverage than using margin loans.

    Are you referring to the GFC? They were great buying opportunities too.

    General comments only. NOT advice.
     
  8. The Y-man

    The Y-man Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,500
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Great point - hence my preference in this case for them to explore "swapping" that milk bar (1 property, 1 tenant with unproven future) for say part ownership in 8 or more buildings, with big listed tenants (if the argument that share markets will always rise is true, then there should be low likelihood of a top 100 listed company by capitalisation should go under as a tenant?) or government tenants.

    Sure you pay management fees (big ones at that). Sure you don't get a say in when buildings are bought/sold/refurbished by the group. Yes they are leveraged - and you don't get a say in how much the LVR (or DE) is. i.e. you need to select the manager carefully.

    But I reckon these people will stand a better chance than with say a LIC because (hopefully):
    • They are in real estate - they can tell a dud property location from a good one (they could go and visit the property, check the build, state of repair etc - much herder to take an LIC apart and analyse each component business)
    • They understand lease terms and conditions - A WALE will take about 20 seconds for them to grasp
    • They understand land component
    • They get what makes a good tenant and bad one
    • They know the implications of a commercial loan and annual vals (and how critical it is)

    There are some decent sized trusts returning 6%~7% pa (some with very low leverage).
    Granted it's going to be damn sight lower than the milk bar - but need to consider the relative risks. Granted it may not be as liquid as an LIC ~ but is a milk bar really that liquid (ok maybe the milk in it).

    The Y-man
     
  9. The Y-man

    The Y-man Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,500
    Location:
    Melbourne
    The post was not aimed at you - you just happened to provide some great examples ;)

    Enough - for the retirees mentioned in the original post - was the intent of the question - and yes no one knows except the OP.

    The Y-man
     
    kierank and orangestreet like this.
  10. orangestreet

    orangestreet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    419
    Location:
    Australia
    Thanks @Y-man, I know it was not aimed at me. I apologise if my post came across as being defensive. I wanted to mention in my post that my comments were only generic in nature and not aimed at anybody (especially not the OP's family). Hope they get to have a great retirement.
     
  11. The Y-man

    The Y-man Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,500
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Agree. (Again not aimed at you - you have brought up an important point that is a quesiotn in my own head)
    But here is what scares me and (if I have not misread his post) @kierank too - what happens if someone reads how dividends will be stable, don't worry, etc - goes and buys in today and there is a big correction tomorrow? It's ok for someone who has a many years down the track, but it could take years for the capital to be made back, and in that time a more elderly person may need to sell because they need (heaven forbid) money for a medical emergency etc.

    The Y-man
     
    kierank likes this.
  12. The Y-man

    The Y-man Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,500
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Yup - I lived through the GFC and still trying to make up for the loss!!

    The Y-man
     
    Redwing, WattleIdo and kierank like this.
  13. orangestreet

    orangestreet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    419
    Location:
    Australia
    Like Steve McKnight used to say, only a fool will tell you that there is no risk in investing. You show me an investing venture (shares, residential property, commercial, term deposits) and I will show you how it can all go wrong. Yes, catastrophically at times.

    In the end, there is no 100% safe option. In life and in investing. To be alive is to be risking something.
     
    Chris Au likes this.
  14. spludgey

    spludgey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,521
    Location:
    Sydney
    Averaging it all out 4.5% net yield is pretty good, I'd personally keep it!
    It'll be hard for them to user the money in a way that has higher returns without risking the capital value of it.
     
  15. Gockie

    Gockie Life is good ☺️ Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,781
    Location:
    Sydney
    Last line... having done the class myself in February, I completely would support the Peter Thornhill class. Now, I'm not sure where your parents are, but Peter has a class in May in Sydney and he'll have one in Melbourne in either June or July.

    Now I'm going to fully disclose, I'll be organising the Melbourne event. Simply because he is happy for me to do it, the Brisbane event 3 weeks back went really well. I think the advice he gives is great. He explains why you buy in a downturn, don't sell. He clears the "mental crap" people have and gives direction. You yourself are probably ok and I feel you don't need to attend his presentation. But I don't know about your parents and if they do decide to go into shares with their life savings I want them to be educated before leaping in. Shares are fairly safe investing if you do it long term and don't buy the crap. :)
     
  16. Zenith Chaos

    Zenith Chaos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Sydney
    The cash buffer is to avoid forced selling of shares when there are falls.

    As a wise man once said
    > Never sell
    > No one can predict the market
     
    pippen likes this.
  17. Zenith Chaos

    Zenith Chaos Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Sydney
    As @truong said your parents have limited diversification which adds risk. This problem illustrates the issue with investment property - you can't really sell a chunk, it's all or nothing.

    Selling the property and putting it all into shares increases volatility. There is a bigger chance those shares could lose 50% than the property losing 50%.

    I'd speak to a number of different people and possibly some paid advice. But not advice where commissions are involved.

    The issues you face are diversification and risk.
     
    Chris Au, Anne11 and kierank like this.
  18. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,414
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    True.

    But one can borrow funds using the IPs as security and rents for debt servicing.

    May be be the best strategy but would be better than selling IP and incurring CGT, selling costs, ...
     
  19. WattleIdo

    WattleIdo midas touch

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,429
    Location:
    Riverina NSW
    You have my interest, I'd love to do the course at some time.
    However, if you're going to keep recommending it, I think you should disclose a lot earlier. And also that you've only just started. Although I know you can do it, you don't have the battle scars yet.
     
  20. Gockie

    Gockie Life is good ☺️ Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,781
    Location:
    Sydney
    :)
    I have @wombat777 and @trinity168 to thank for getting me into it!

    Yes, "new" to shares (well, I did own back in the 1990's (incl woolies float and telstra) /early 2000's too but I hardly knew what I was doing back then). Peter's classes illustrates why to invest in shares and what to invest in. Makes it super simple and clear. He has a long track record (40 odd years of educating in this space - as long as I have been alive) and the numbers and charts to back it up. So I trust him.

    With property, I can see these booms are a way to boost your wealth quickly. But booms don't always happen! Sydney's near peak, not sure how well other cities will go, but I have my doubts they can do a Sydney. Therefore shares are a great way to go... plus no maintenance, bills, buying and selling costs, stamp duty, land tax, tenants, pest and building, costs of depreciation schedules etc....
    Collect dividends, buy on dips. :)

    Long term income and secondly wealth - i'm confident to have increases in capital if held for the long term. :)
     
    Last edited: 22nd Apr, 2017
    Jack Chen, trinity168 and pippen like this.

Build Passive Income WITHOUT Dropping $15K On Buyers Agents Each Time! Helping People Achieve PASSIVE INCOME Using Our Unique Data-Driven System, So You Can Confidently Buy Top 5% Growth & Cashflow Property, Anywhere In Australia