Retired, Equity a plenty, Living off the pension.

Discussion in 'Investment Strategy' started by albanga, 30th Jun, 2016.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Plutus

    Plutus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    317
    Location:
    The North
    Quality contribution. nice variation on "well i'm offended by that and you need to calm down". :rolleyes:
     
  2. MTR

    MTR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,858
    Location:
    My World
    to hell with it, that pretty much wipes out the human species:p
     
    JDP1, kierank and Perthguy like this.
  3. Plutus

    Plutus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    317
    Location:
    The North
    I feel the same way about that sort of list as I feel about religions that cap the number of spots in their heaven/afterlife. I don't fancy my odds of making the cut, therefore I'm not going to support it.
     
    HUGH72 and kierank like this.
  4. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    ... and I forgot to add in the Unemployed. Haha.

    Geez, without trying I think I might have solved Australia's debt and deficit problem, all with one policy.

    Is it too late for me to nominate myself for today's Federal Election?
     
    Bayview and MTR like this.
  5. euro73

    euro73 Well-Known Member Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,129
    Location:
    The beautiful Hills District, Sydney Australia

    Do you feel the same way about asylum seekers?


    The prospect of forcing retirees to sell up in order to realise cash flow to live, is not one that sits well with me. But I also think that retirees sitting on properties with oodles of equity and still claiming full pensions as those assets are exempt from asset tests, is ludicrous.

    I dont see why every retiree claiming an age pension cant be asked to enter into a reverse mortgage with an Australian Govt statuatory authority at the cash rate of the day, up to a maximum of 50% LVR, so that the age pension paid to them can be recovered upon death.

    This would allow them to stay in their houses, but also draw down a pension to see out their lives... and it would be affordable for the nation.

    Like it or not, Lib, Labor , Green or Independent - we have both a revenue and an expenditure issue and these sorts of things will have to be introduced one day.
     
    Francesco, HUGH72 and Bayview like this.
  6. euro73

    euro73 Well-Known Member Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,129
    Location:
    The beautiful Hills District, Sydney Australia

    valuations costs $200-300, and you'd be doing one - when the reverse mortgage is established... just like you do now when you set up a mortgage. Another isnt required unless a top up is applied for. The pension paid to people over many years is far greater than $200-300
     
  7. euro73

    euro73 Well-Known Member Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,129
    Location:
    The beautiful Hills District, Sydney Australia
    No you couldnt. Believe me. I worked at Centrelink for 13 years. That will not fly
     
  8. Marg4000

    Marg4000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,417
    Location:
    Qld
    Why not?

    PPOR is exempt, and I would meet the requirements of the asset and income test for the age pension. I have not gifted any money.
    Marg
     
    Plutus likes this.
  9. Bayview

    Bayview Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,144
    Location:
    Inside your device
    It won't help the housing situation, PG - but it might help the welfare situation...at least until they die.

    After which (unless the owners sell earlier); then the property can become townhouses. ;)
     
    Perthguy likes this.
  10. Bayview

    Bayview Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,144
    Location:
    Inside your device
    :eek:

    OMG...you would have seen some stellar specimens
     
  11. Marg4000

    Marg4000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,417
    Location:
    Qld
    I worked in the forerunner of Centrelink, the Department of Social Security, back in the 1970s.

    And yes, lots of interesting stories!!
    Marg
     
  12. Owlet

    Owlet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    758
    Location:
    VIC
    I don't like the idea of the elderly having to sell their PPOR. I don't like the idea of a death tax either.
    If one was in the position where they need/take a pension from the government, could the government keep a tab. When the person dies, the deceased estate pays / repays the pension taken. I would think this a fair system. If you need the pension because you have nothing - then you have nothing to pay back. If you take a pension to help you see out your days in the family home then you repay on death. If you were a self-funded retiree who did not take a pension you would not penalised (as you would be with a death tax).
     
    Marg4000 and Francesco like this.
  13. Francesco

    Francesco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    647
    Location:
    Canberra, Brisbane
    Yes, this makes sense that any 'mutual obligation' the OO has in the days of living on the pension in the PPOR will be the pension and concessions. If the repayment to the public were restricted to the pensions, the pensioner is ahead by the special benefits and concessions as a pensioner. On the other hand the government would have a stream of revenue to top up funds for its budget.

    I can imagine that schemes will be hatched to enable the pensioner to hollow out the equity in the PPOR.
     
  14. euro73

    euro73 Well-Known Member Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,129
    Location:
    The beautiful Hills District, Sydney Australia

    Your existing PPOR is exempt, but your other assets are assessed under the asset test. But if you sold off other assets and pocketed a profit and then reinvested those profits into an upgraded PPOR in order to avoid the asset test...not quite the same .
     
  15. euro73

    euro73 Well-Known Member Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,129
    Location:
    The beautiful Hills District, Sydney Australia
    I worked at Auburn, Blacktown, Penrith, Mt Druitt - so yes.
     
  16. Marg4000

    Marg4000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,417
    Location:
    Qld
    So if a retired person sells their PPOR, they cannot upgrade without Centrelink penalty?
    Marg
     
  17. Perthguy

    Perthguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,767
    Location:
    Perth
    I agree. I don't want to force anyone out of their home. At the same time, I have seen pensioners barely able to feed themselves but it is effectively too expensive to move to a smaller house because of all the disincentives. I would like to see some policies to assist pensioners to downsize if they choose to.

    Put it this way. We want pensioners to downsize? Simple. Make sure they are better off, not worse off if they do.
     
    Bayview and Angel like this.
  18. Owlet

    Owlet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    758
    Location:
    VIC
    I don't like the use of the term schemes. You are not evil if you follow the rules of the government of the day. Their money, their equity. Your point is not dissimilar to the pensioner who potentially spent their surplus income throughout their life on things other than a PPOR.

    However, I was of the thinking that a reverse mortgage, guarantor arrangement or a sale would negate a government pension agreement. I could see some elderly folk being in favour of this arrangement. If they were to venture down the reverse mortgage (essentially an equity pull), it could be much harder to say no to their children who have may be pressuring for a hand out.
     
  19. euro73

    euro73 Well-Known Member Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,129
    Location:
    The beautiful Hills District, Sydney Australia

    That's not what I said, to be fair. You have changed your question ....

    Previously - "if we were so inclined, we could sell our PPOR AND cash in our investments and buy a multi million dollar PPOR, keeping back just enough to meet the income and asset cut-off amounts"

    Now - "So if a retired person sells their PPOR, they cannot upgrade without Centrelink penalty?"


    Your first question goes to Centrelinks treatment of the money received from selling of a PPOR and from selling INVESTMENTS, before reinvesting that money in a new PPOR.
    Your second goes to Centrelinks treatment of the money received from selling of a PPOR , before reinvesting that money in a new PPOR.


    • proceeds from the sale of your principal home you intend to use to purchase another within 12 months. The funds will be used in the calculation of your financial assets to determine the deemed income under the deeming provisions



    • Screen Shot 2016-07-02 at 9.15.25 PM.png
     
  20. Bayview

    Bayview Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,144
    Location:
    Inside your device
    Thank god us Employers are now being gouged to the tune of 10.5% on top of their weekly wage to help fund these donkeys when they get to pensionerville. :rolleyes:
     
    Sonamic likes this.