Here's one for our commercial gurus! It's a bit of an odd one because we usually seek long term tenants but in this situation this presents an issue. Hypothetically lets say you purchase a commercial property and have long term tenants who at the time had already commenced a 3 year tenure with three further 5 year terms. Market review is not applicable and CPI review is valid. Having purchased a tenanted property you understand that this lease cannot be terminated, rather transferred to yourself; allowing you to make no adjustments to the lease agreement. Now lets say you wish to utilise this space more effectively however cannot remove the tenants from the premises nor can you over rule their favourable lease agreement. In addition to this you cannot increase their rent during the further terms with the exception of CPI reviews. What would your options be to: 1. remove the tenants; or 2. increase the rent. I understand that you can increase rent in the rare occasion that comparable rents in the area are much higher. But for this situation lets assume the business is unique and there are no other similar properties in the area. The other option is to demolish/ renovate, however let us not consider this in this situation.
You haven't stated exactly why you would want to remove a supposedly compliant tenant? If you wanted them to change their lease arrangement you could offer them a financial inducement to end their current lease. Only you can know the financials of what is possible.
As I mentioned, you want to utilise the space more effectively. An example would be to operate a business if it was a warehouse by converting it into a gym or storage yard etc. Notwithstanding the increased risk, there would be incentive for greater yields. Conversely you would be looking to increase the rent, keeping the same tenant. Payout is an option, however not a very feasible one.
There are no circumstances under the lease that you can apply an increase other than in accordance with the rent review clause. The tenant enjoys a below market rent, you reviewed the lease in your due diligence and see stuck with the tenant on those terms. What do you mean by transferred to yourself? If you own the property and the lease is assigned to you as occupant then the lease is terminated sad you can't lease to yourself. If you mean you buy the premises sad a going concern, you accept the existing lease warts and all.
Transferred in terms of landlords obligations are transferred to oneself. Yes going concern sale. Not very ideal for the investor, as their circumstances may change and they may want to adopt more risk and return!
That's what you bought, you live with it knowing that you won't get a market review until the tenant vacates hence you paid a reduced price factoring in the lower cashflow over the term certain.
Let's try think outside the box team, I wasn't asking for flaws in the procedure, rather an intuitive way out!
Thinking outside the box won't help if you've got a lease and that will stop you from removing the tenants or increasing the rent. What sort of "intuitive way out" are you hoping to find?
Have you asked the tenant how they feel about the site? I broke a commercial lease with 100% agreement with the owner twice. Each time we were happy to quit and move on each successively larger. The third time we purchased. And were paid for the fitouts each time by the owner who then leased it with a fitout and we didnt have to dump it. You cant "transfer a lease to yourself". Anyone can mutually terminate a lease if you both agree to terms. You never know they may want out for somewhere bigger / smaller or different location or be struggling to pay.
Free Property Depreciation Calculator Property Investors! Ready to Pay Less Tax? Estimate how much Property Depreciation you can claim on your Investment Property. Washington Brown's calculator is the first calculator to draw on real properties to determine an accurate estimate. » Calculate My Savings