Real estate valuation - WACC/Discounting

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by kai, 3rd Jul, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. kai

    kai New Member

    Joined:
    16th May, 2017
    Posts:
    3
    Location:
    VIC
    Hi guys,

    I wanted to ask you guys about property valuation. After attending several real estate meetups recently, I have noticed the different valuation methods that people use when ascertaining their returns pre-purchase. I've been trying to find more information on the discount rates/WACC estimation for residential real estate, and have noticed that it's not as clear cut as valuation for a company/investment.

    From what I gather there are two common methods:
    1) Base rate (interest rate)+ the premiums (i.e liquidity risk, returns)
    2) Top down approach: average of what investors in the same area expect

    After checking these out I wanted to asked if you guys utilize WACC/discount estimation into your assessment of valuation of a viable real estate investment? if so do you use the above methods?
    Or am I completely wrong?

    Thanks!
    Kai
     
  2. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,224
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Portfolio theory is fine provided you are analysing equities or have a substantial property portfolio across several lenders on different terms.

    Back of an envelope evaluations should suffice unless you're already using Dyna, Cougar or MRI.
     
  3. Tom Simpson

    Tom Simpson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    13th Dec, 2016
    Posts:
    186
    Location:
    Subiaco
    I remember doing these calcs at uni trying to align property prices to the present value of future expected income. Nope. Doesn't work that way.

    These calcs fail to take into consideration the biggest price factor which is EMOTION.

    Given that the bulk of the market is owner occupied they drive the prices and investors are price takers. No owner is concerned about how much rent they're going to receive from the house they plan to live in until the sunset of their life.
     
  4. Daniel007

    Daniel007 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    21st Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    256
    Location:
    Sydney
    Commercial market is a different story, which is basically the only place these methodologies are used. Like you said, it's a bit pointless for residential.
     
  5. kai

    kai New Member

    Joined:
    16th May, 2017
    Posts:
    3
    Location:
    VIC
    Thanks for everyone's insight into the valuation of residential properties!

    @Scott No Mates Haha, I knew that valuation of residential (non-multifamily/noncommercial) was going to more of an art form and I was too naive to hope that there was going to be a MRI/Dyna/Argus equivalent to help reduce the risk of investment.
     
  6. Phase2

    Phase2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jul, 2016
    Posts:
    1,289
    Location:
    Perth
    WACC is nothing more than your own cost of capital.. how you come up with that number is up to you.

    NPV/DCF analysis is a waste of time for personal investing. All it really does is help you compare investment options that use the same macro economic assumptions, but have different input variables.