re: 800sqm vs 450sqm new block of land

Discussion in 'Investment Strategy' started by RJS, 16th Nov, 2016.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi everyone,

    Goal: We are thinking of investing in a block of land to get some equity in future.

    Scenario:
    Say we have 800sqm and 450sqm land within the same estate.

    Approx.. 400k and 320k. Difference of 80k.

    If we were to build a 3 or 4 bed house around 300k.

    Houses in the area currently rent around 3bed: $350-400 and 4 bed: $450-500

    I would believe/hope the equity would be more in a years’ time on the bigger land but I would be losing money with the bigger block?

    But is my though process correct.

    Thanks
     
  2. D.T.

    D.T. Specialist Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    9,190
    Location:
    Adelaide and Gold Coast
    Go for the bigger one, it'll have better resale value / capital growth as they're rarer. Only reason you wouldn't would be if the smaller was in a better location.
     
    Whitecat likes this.
  3. Beelzebub

    Beelzebub Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    822
    Location:
    Lost
    Vacant block in an estate? Are you planning to build?
     
  4. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks for the reply DT. :)

    I would think so as well but if the rents don't increase much, am I not losing money.

    Assuming rent increase to 550 and the 800sqm after the house build would be approx. 700k
     
  5. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    Vacant block... Yes.

    Planning to build.. Yes
     
  6. D.T.

    D.T. Specialist Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    9,190
    Location:
    Adelaide and Gold Coast
    Not sure about that estate specifically, but in most the smaller ones are far more common than bigger ones.

    In my role as a PM, something i see all the time is where there's a bunch of newly built houses all online clamoring to undercut each other to get a tenant in. If you're a 4x2 with 2 living areas and an outdoor area, you have something different/better to offer than the masses and as a result have a better likely outcome.
     
    Colin Rice and Ross Forrester like this.
  7. Beelzebub

    Beelzebub Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    822
    Location:
    Lost
    I believe the best strategy with H/L is smaller blocks with bigger houses in terms of best outcome for dollars spent.

    I remember he said something about these new estates not really catering to the single mum market.

    Something like a 3/2/2 on 350-400 sqm block

    You should talk to @sash who has done a few H/L investments.
     
    Stoffo, Connor and RJS like this.
  8. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks Beelzehub.
    I have posted sash.

    Sorry for the amateur question but what do you mean by "3/2/2 on 350-400 sqm block"?
     
  9. Propertunity

    Propertunity Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,476
    Location:
    NSW
    bed / bath / car numbers of
     
    RJS likes this.
  10. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
  11. Connor

    Connor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    31st Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    437
    Location:
    Melbourne
    You're thinking right RJS.
    You're pretty much spending an extra 80k for a negligible increase in rent... Not worth it at all.
    Go for the smaller block and build a 4 bed home. You outlay vs returns will be alot better.
     
    Beelzebub likes this.
  12. dabbler

    dabbler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,572
    Location:
    Sid en e - olympic city
    This would totally depend on where it is and what is around it, there is also what the renters want and what the home buyers want.

    There are places I watch that the answer would be different for each (block and house).

    You need to work out what is what & who is who in the zoo :)
     
    Colin Rice, Beelzebub and Stoffo like this.
  13. Stoffo

    Stoffo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jul, 2016
    Posts:
    5,331
    Location:
    In the Tweed
    As above, you need to do some due diligence on the area
    (Other places being build, target demographic)

    I've noticed with lots of people a back yard is no longer required:oops:
    Lots of people rather spend their time in front of the TV, in a Cafe or just "out" rather than mow the lawn, kick a ball with the kids or tinker in the garden :eek:

    One last thing, dont rule out the larger block, ask "if" it could have 2 smaller/tasteful units built on it, costs would be a bit more, but offset by 2 more affordable rents for the area :cool:
     
    RJS likes this.
  14. ashish1137

    ashish1137 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    12th Sep, 2015
    Posts:
    932
    Location:
    Sydney
    I dont understand what is with people andd larger land component :)
    Unless you can add value later. :)

    You would be paying more land tax.
    The tenant has to maintain all the vacant land.
    Unless you can build or subdivide in future, I dont see value in it.

    I would prefer smaller block and a product wgich is in demand in the area.

    Having said the above, what state it is?
    What is the demograpgic of the suburb?
    Holding costs?
    What sort of charges are there for pamd tax in that state?
    Factor all these in and you can make a decision.

    There has been cases where smaller land lots have appreciated more than latger land lots.
    Would.it be too much if i ask the details on state and estate?
    The numbers and rents are compelling though. :cool:

    Regards
     
    Beelzebub likes this.
  15. Tony Fleming

    Tony Fleming Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    717
    Location:
    Sydney
    Bigger block will give you a lot more options short and long term. As others have said it depends on the demographic as well. Imagine if it was all retirees wanting to downsize. Where is the estate located?
     
  16. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    NSW

    NSW, West Sydney
     
  17. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    Outer West Sydney
     
    Tony Fleming likes this.
  18. Tony Fleming

    Tony Fleming Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    717
    Location:
    Sydney
    I'd say bigger block would be the best option. A lot of infrastructure planned there over the next few years targeting job growth.
     
    Colin Rice and RJS like this.
  19. RJS

    RJS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    104
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks Tony.

    The think I'm worried is holding costs. at the moment. rents around 450-500 for 4 bed.
    With the larger land plus a house build would make the loan approx 700k.
    Rents would (hope) gradually increase but am I not negative for a couple of years. And I am hoping this property would help me get some equity out.
    Sorry for the amateurish questions.
     
  20. dabbler

    dabbler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,572
    Location:
    Sid en e - olympic city
    It is not all about you & of course your free to buy the smallest blocks you can find, or units, or whatever......
     
    ashish1137 likes this.