Peter Spann on 7:30 Report

Discussion in 'Property Experts' started by Humphrey, 10th Aug, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Humphrey

    Humphrey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    74
    Location:
    Sydney
    Redwing likes this.
  2. tobe

    tobe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,814
    Location:
    Melbourne
    It's pretty damning. Really more about consumers who lost their investments during the gfc unable to get compensated by financial planners insurance.
     
  3. The Y-man

    The Y-man Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,525
    Location:
    Melbourne
  4. hammer

    hammer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    2,867
    Location:
    Darwin
    I'm of two minds with this stuff...

    One part of me is going out to get ma shotgun to shoots me sum spruikers!

    The other part is in awe that these people spend how much? On something they didn't understand? Sold to them in a seminar?!

    But then I realize how effective the seminars are and it could easily have been me.

    Pass the shotgun....
     
    Bayview and Humphrey like this.
  5. Piston_Broke

    Piston_Broke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    4,140
    Location:
    Margaritaville
    Outfoxed by the Fox.
    Although the vast majority of "smart" investors also thought that McBank could do no wrong at that time.
     
    Simon Hampel and Redwing like this.
  6. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    ...so this begs the question.....will this happen to the Peter Thornhill devotees also.......
     
    Propertunity likes this.
  7. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    12,414
    Location:
    Sydney
    That's a very good point. MacBank were the golden child of the pre-GFC boom and everyone wanted a piece of the action. The headlines were all about how many millionaires worked there (ie the company had done so well that the employees were all getting rich).
     
  8. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    12,414
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hardly the same thing - Thornhill is educating about a strategy, not selling a product.

    He gains nothing from the advice he gives - isn't doing an upsell to a much more expensive course, nor convincing people to invest in a product he makes a profit from.

    Education is not spruiking.
     
  9. Humphrey

    Humphrey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    74
    Location:
    Sydney
    This pretty much sums up my thoughts as well. On the one hand I hate seeing people getting ripped off, but on the other hand where does personal responsibility come into it? Should we legislate to save people from themselves?
     
  10. hammer

    hammer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    2,867
    Location:
    Darwin
    You know what? I can't believe I'm saying this but I think yes.

    Or at least legislate against spruikers and "seminars".

    The selling tactics they use tap into us on a caveman level. It doesn't matter how smart or savvy you are, these guys are often so good that it will suck you in.

    People are entering a well rehearsed, slick marketing machine that is pretty much irresistible.
     
  11. Redwing

    Redwing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,489
    Location:
    WA
  12. geoffw

    geoffw Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    15th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,677
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Initially, Peter Spann was educating about strategy, not selling. He was selling nothing but seminars, and used to claim that his advice was unbiased because he didn't sell.

    I'm into property because of Peter Spann. He advocated property and share techniques, buy and hold for growth and writing covered calls as a technique to generate income to service property.

    It was only later in, presumably as it became more difficult to find new seminar attendees, or as the dollar signs grew to the opportunities.

    I lost a little bit from products he sold, but I only lost what I invested. I didn't leverage into any product.

    Similarly I invested into Steve Navra's fund but didn't leverage. I did manage to get most of my capital out of that.

    Where I did lose was in selling a business with vendor finance. The purchaser deliberately transferred assets out of his name into his wife's name before going bankrupt. It was borderline illegal but it's not covered by any industry regulation or compensation fund.
     
    tobe, Blacky, datto and 2 others like this.
  13. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    it aint the spruiking but all the devotees jumping into shares thinking it is better than property. some are establising margin loans.

     
  14. turk

    turk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    926
    Location:
    Brighton

    Yep, can't understand this thing of borrowing money to invest.:rolleyes:
     
  15. geoffw

    geoffw Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    15th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,677
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Last edited: 11th Aug, 2017
  16. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    Would be more aptly named...Money Laundering and Extortion Thread....:) more exciting....even largest bank CBA are cottoning on to this to assist with their record $10B profits.
     
  17. jim1964

    jim1964 1941

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,300
    Location:
    Westcoster Strahan Tasmania
    Agreed!! This should be done sooner rather than later.
     
  18. kierank

    kierank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    8,415
    Location:
    Gold Coast
    We had an investment via Freedom Fox and Peter might have sent us an email before he sold but we never received it.

    I changed my email address some time after I made the investment so my email from Peter would have bounced. My postal address never changed and we have received correspondence that was posted by Freedom Fox.

    One would have thought that, if Freedom Fox thought this matter was so serious, they would have tried the post to get in touch with us when our email bounced.

    Yes, we lost money through this investment.

    Yes, it affected our retirement as it was via our SMSF.

    No, we haven't forgiven Freedom Fox.

    No, we don't believe Freedom Fox nor Peter tried hard enough to contact us or to warn us.

    Yes, we have moved on.

    Yes, it could have been worse.

    We were considering making Freedom Fox our financial planners/advisors. Having them selling their own products was a red flag that didn't sit easy with me.

    In highsight, Freedom Fox is an interesting name for a business. Peter is Free and some may consider him a bit of a ...
     
    Redwing and The Y-man like this.
  19. Biz

    Biz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,517
    Location:
    Investard county
    You're situation would have been much worse if you invested with Freeman Fox.

    Who is this Freedom fox you speak of? :D

    You're so loaded Kieran, you don't even know where you're doing your dough anymore! :D
     
  20. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    12,414
    Location:
    Sydney
    just like all the devotees jumping into property thinking it is better than shares. some are borrowing 90% or more of the value of their houses! :p

    same same but different
     
    Redwing and dabbler like this.