Permits approved with inactive strata

Discussion in 'Development' started by Fonga, 9th Dec, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Fonga

    Fonga New Member

    Joined:
    21st Sep, 2017
    Posts:
    3
    Location:
    Watsonia
    Hi all,

    I’ve recently had approval for a 3 lot subdivision on an 800sqm lot size. The block beside me has a townhouse which we share an inactive strata (there services run under my block water, power and sewer pit). No common property all fence off and separated blocks. I must get a subdivision done of my 3 lots prior to building which includes the division of the townhouse block too. I’ve spoken to the neighbours and have agreed to foot the bill and redirect all their services but they had a sook and told me to **** off. Lol
    I’m technically paying to improve their property, updated services and might even improve their property value but they’re being stubborn. Hopefully u guys can help with some advice on how to tackle this. They may just want cash who knows. The council are supportive. Why was a subdivision allowed to be done like that which was around 1985.
    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. lixas4

    lixas4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    789
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Subdivisions are still being done with services going through abutting land. Sometimes easements are placed over the services, or an implied easement statement is added to the plan, or common property, or a limited owners corporation is set up to 'manage the common services'. Either way, even if none of the above are there, the fact the services have been there for so long, there will be easement rights under common law (prescriptive easement /lost modern grant).

    So you have to deal with it in a fashion that your neighbour has rights. I would negotiate calmly. And see a specialist property lawyer if you dont get anywhere.
     
    Sackie likes this.
  3. Marg4000

    Marg4000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,417
    Location:
    Qld
    It is what it is.

    I doubt they had a “sook”, but probably took professional advice before committing to the cost. Their development was done legally, so why should they pay?

    It is probably up to you to relocate the services.
    Marg
     
  4. Fonga

    Fonga New Member

    Joined:
    21st Sep, 2017
    Posts:
    3
    Location:
    Watsonia
    I meant I have agreed to foot the bill not the neighbors. Apologies