P&I (front-loading) vs IO break even point?

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by FXD, 5th Oct, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. FXD

    FXD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Aug, 2018
    Posts:
    290
    Location:
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Hi finance experts,

    For same loan term (eg: 20 years), how do I work out if P&I or IO is the better way to go based on
    the following two factors: A) interest rate difference, and B) years of staying with the new lender?

    P&I has front-loading so during early years of the term, maximum interest is incurred in the monthly
    repayments vs IO. Plus, I suspect different lenders use different front-loading amount as well?

    The purpose of the question is to help me answer the following:

    If I were to refinance loan amount $L from lender A (IO rate X%) to B (P&I rate Y%), where X > Y,
    what is the minimum duration (M years) I will need to stay with B to make the refinance worthwhile
    and actually saves me interests over M years?

    Any such calculator or spreadsheet exists?

    Thanks,
    FXD
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,001
    Location:
    Australia wide
    First you have to define what you mean by 'better'.
    cash flow v interest savings.
    Do you include tax savings, do you include increased serviceability etc.

    I tried to work it out once and all that I worked out was that it was too complex for my excel skills.

    See
    Loan Tip: IO loan or PI with lower rates? IO loan or PI with lower rates?
     
    Cia likes this.
  3. chylld

    chylld Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,701
    Location:
    Sydney
    M=0. You immediately start saving interest once you move to a lower interest option.

    Your repayment as a whole will be larger as there is a principal component, but you should count this as equity in the property and a hit only on cashflow, not networth.

    The "front-loading" phenomenon you describe is simply the fact that the interest component of the total P&I repayment is larger at the beginning of the term than at the end, where it reduces to zero along with the size of the borrowing.
     
    craigc, Jamesaurus and Harry30 like this.
  4. jazzsidana

    jazzsidana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    27th Jan, 2018
    Posts:
    459
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Keep things simple.

    Define your goal first before worrying about interest rates and all the other stuff..

    On scale of 1 to 10, interest rate is the important but it's not the no. 1 thing to worry about. More important is what are you trying to achieve or what the end goal is??

    Happy to chat over the phone or inbox if needed..

    Cheers,
     
  5. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,653
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    Most people that we work with understand that this type of thing is not strictly financial.

    There are many other considerations such as resources and risk profile etc .

    Dollar differentials are one aspect only, yet most people drive them as them as the primary importance factor

    Ta

    Rolf
     
  6. jazzsidana

    jazzsidana Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    27th Jan, 2018
    Posts:
    459
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Well said buddy!!..
     
  7. Peter_Tersteeg

    Peter_Tersteeg Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,171
    Location:
    03 9877 3000
    There's a lot of different metrics you could measure this by, but you need to start with calculator that easily allows you to figure out different repayment schedules.

    Take a look at the attached calculator, it does give you an actual dollar figure for a simple calculation. It also shows the cost of a compressed P&I period after the IO period has ended.
     

    Attached Files:

    craigc and FXD like this.
  8. FXD

    FXD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Aug, 2018
    Posts:
    290
    Location:
    Melbourne, Victoria
    I read that tip and then went on to your Tax Tip 46 which is more relevant to my ask about 'better'.
    However, it seems that one has gone without firm conclusion if it's considered legit ... or perhaps
    I can't fully digest if any conclusion has been formed.

    Rgds,
    FXD
     
  9. FXD

    FXD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Aug, 2018
    Posts:
    290
    Location:
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Great thanks very much for your generous sharing, will have a go at it.

    Cheers,
    FXD
     
  10. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    42,001
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Is that the tip about paying io on a pi loan? If so I know of no one who has done a private ruling
     
  11. FXD

    FXD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Aug, 2018
    Posts:
    290
    Location:
    Melbourne, Victoria