**Notice to Remedy Breach**

Discussion in 'Property Management' started by MTI, 28th Feb, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. larrylarry

    larrylarry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,386
    Location:
    Sydney
    Just say, it's litigious... Tenant v Landlord, PM, Strata and Owners Corp. Can't say much more. Always be proactive as a LL.
     
    MTI likes this.
  2. MTI

    MTI Member

    Joined:
    28th Feb, 2018
    Posts:
    21
    Location:
    Australia
    Thank you @larrylarry. Much appreciated : )

    I will keep that in mind - be proactive ALWAYS.
     
  3. Ted Varrick

    Ted Varrick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    21st Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,941
    Location:
    No Mans Land
    Larryx2, why don't you give your fellow posters a hypothetical example?

    As it sounds a little unusual given the tenant has a contract with the landlord's agent and the landlord, but not the Strata Committee or the OC (short of some bylaws and their breaches, such as noise, common property issues, hard surface flooring, pets, brothels/business use, short term/sub-letting etc, and any special by-laws anyone might not be aware of)...
     
  4. larrylarry

    larrylarry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,386
    Location:
    Sydney
    In this specific case, it’s a hand rail in poor state. The plaintiff had a scatter gun approach. It’s all about control and knowledge.

    To my mind it’s unusual and the LL shouldn’t even be involved but litigation is conducted such that shoot first then decide whether the target is correct. All I’m saying is as a LL, be proactive and ensure instructions to PM is timely. When the blame game starts, each protects its own interest.
     
    Ted Varrick likes this.
  5. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,100
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Exactly - the excuse from the PM that the LL was not contactable is pathetic and more so if it's true or that the LL couldn't be bothered to respond (it's your asset).

    Just because your agent doesn't respond to the LL's phone calls (means nothing /very little) however an unanswered/unanswered email is damning.
     

Build Passive Income WITHOUT Dropping $15K On Buyers Agents Each Time! Helping People Achieve PASSIVE INCOME Using Our Unique Data-Driven System, So You Can Confidently Buy Top 5% Growth & Cashflow Property, Anywhere In Australia