millionaires who pay next to no income tax

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Terry_w, 22nd Mar, 2016.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,977
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Meet the 56 millionaires who pay next to no income tax

    Paying tax has become optional for 56 of Australia's highest earners. Newly-released tax statistics show each of the 56 paid next to no income tax in 2013–14, not even the Medicare Levy, even though each earned more than $1 million.

    But escaping tax cost the millionaires dearly. The same document shows 27 of the 56 claimed a combined $46.7 million for the "cost of managing tax affairs", around $1.7 million each.

    The Tax Office says "cost of managing tax affairs" includes the cost of preparing and lodging tax returns, the fees paid to recognised tax advisors, the cost of court appeals and interest charges imposed in relation to tax disputes.


    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/tax-stats-meet-the-56-millionaires-who-pay-next-to-nothing-20160321-gnndna.html#ixzz43aEj0FTI
     
    BigKahuna likes this.
  2. EN710

    EN710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,218
    Location:
    Melburn
    Do you think it's all on paper only lost?

    I wouldn't call them millionaires if they make minus, regardless the gross turnover
     
    Zoolander likes this.
  3. willair

    willair Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,795
    Location:
    ....UKI nth nsw ....
    That alone keeps a lot of people employed-"cost of managing tax affairs",also gives society's mistaken perception on the odds of getting caught..
     
  4. Xenia

    Xenia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    3,863
  5. D.T.

    D.T. Specialist Property Manager Business Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    9,190
    Location:
    Adelaide and Gold Coast
    As long as done legally, I have no issue with it.
     
    Francesco, Vacant and Sackie like this.
  6. Phantom

    Phantom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,054
    Location:
    Sydney
    That's the effect of prudent tax planning.
     
    Sackie likes this.
  7. aussieshorter

    aussieshorter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    29th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    131
    Location:
    Brisbane
    No sane person would pay more in tax than they legally have to.

    As long as it's legal, I have no complaints.
     
  8. Skilled_Migrant

    Skilled_Migrant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    21st Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    796
    Location:
    Melbourne
    www.investopedia.com/terms/d/double-irish-with-a-dutch-sandwich.asp
    Double irish with a dutch sandwich is also legal. Anything wrong with it ?
     
  9. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,977
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Two ways to look at it:
    From the individual tax payer's perspective, no nothing is wrong becaue the tax payer has lawfully reduced their tax.

    From a macro economic point of view, yes there is something wrong because a tax payer is diverting funds out of the country.
     
  10. Phantom

    Phantom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,054
    Location:
    Sydney
    "I'm not evading tax in any way shape or form. Of course I'm minimising my tax. If anybody in this country doesn't minimise their tax they want their head read. As a government I can tell you you're not spending it that well that we should be paying extra." - Kerry Packer
     
    Cactus, Foxdan and Bran like this.
  11. AndrewTDP

    AndrewTDP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    764
    Location:
    Newcastle
    We celebrate this yet whinge about welfare recipients doing cash jobs.

    What a sad moral indictment.
     
  12. headsonbeds

    headsonbeds Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    155
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Bit ott Andrew! I didn't see wild celebrations :p

    56 people is such a small number. It's very easy for high net worth individuals to accrue losses etc in any 1 year period. These people may have paid large amounts of tax in the years around this - or not!

    The "cost of managing tax affairs" is a little bit freaky. I'd like to know a little more about that.
     
    Cactus likes this.
  13. Skilled_Migrant

    Skilled_Migrant Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    21st Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    796
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I do not know much about Kerry Packer.
    A quick google search shows that he built his wealth predominantly from facilitating gambling by building casinos. I do not understand his relevance here ?
    Please correct me if I am misinterpreting it, but are you suggesting that Australia(ns) should follow his tax philosophy or they should seek psychiatric help ?
     
  14. JohnPropChat

    JohnPropChat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Sep, 2015
    Posts:
    2,293
    Location:
    Middle Earth
    There is a fine line between tax minimization and tax evasion.
     
  15. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,514
    Location:
    Sydney
    The article explains why the High Wealth Taskforce exists.
     
  16. aussieshorter

    aussieshorter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    29th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    131
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Do you disagree with the comment? Regardless of who said it, do you think it's wrong?
     
  17. Phantom

    Phantom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,054
    Location:
    Sydney
    This thread is about certain people who paid no tax. The said people paid no tax because they planned their affairs in such a way under the law of this country to allow them to do so. The relevance of Kerry Packer is that he was an extremely wealthy Australian (as are the people in the article whom this thread is about) who replied with that quote above when asked if he avoids paying tax by the House of Representatives Select Committee in 1991.
    Now, the question remains - is there anyone in this country who does not try to minimize their tax?
     
    Cactus, HUGH72 and Sackie like this.
  18. Raydar

    Raydar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    305
    Location:
    Newcastle NSW
     
    HUGH72, Player, Terry_w and 1 other person like this.
  19. Raydar

    Raydar Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    6th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    305
    Location:
    Newcastle NSW
    Doesn't let me keep the time queue in the link, jump to 4min46sec
     
  20. Blacky

    Blacky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,066
    Location:
    Bali
    Im not sure if we are 'celebrating' it - however, provided it is legal, then I have no issue with the individuals doing it.
    I do however have an issue with the system which allows it.

    The big difference between this and welfare recipients doing 'cashes' is that the later is illegal (I am assuming the former is).

    The Australian system is broken.

    Blacky
     
    Cactus and Terry_w like this.