main residence capital gain tax exemption BUT div 43 claimed

Discussion in 'Introductions' started by Lilly, 16th Oct, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Lilly

    Lilly New Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2018
    Posts:
    1
    Location:
    South Bank
    Hi guys,

    i have a question about tax issue. i lived in a property as main residence for years and i bought a new one and moved in there and rented out the old one for half year before i sold it.

    i know that there's 6-year period exemption rule for main residence making rental income. So i don't need to have captal gain tax when it was sold.
    BUT my question is that i declared my rental income but at the same time i claimed div 43 in my 2017 financial year tax return.

    i know that if you buy investment property and claimed div 43 before it was sold, you have to reduce cost base of the property so you need to pay more CGT. (you saved money before by claiming div 43 so when you sold it, you need to pay back some money)

    in my case, i am exempt for CGT for main residence, what to do about the div 43 part that i claimed before? or simply leave it? if so, everyone would have done the same. (for main residence with rental income within 6 years before selling, if you didnt claim div 43, it was your loss)???


    Thanks very much!
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,943
    Location:
    Australia wide
    nothing to do if the property is exempt.
     
  3. Mike A

    Mike A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,656
    Location:
    UNIVERSE
    Worth doing a scenario analysis. I just did one for a client where the four year rule was available for property two and main residence absence provisions on property one. If the client had merely applied the main residence abscence provision the tax difference would have been 200k. A huge difference.

    In this case it was worth not applying the main residence absence provisions and applying the four year rule. A small bit of tax was better to pay this financial year than a larger tax liability in 5 years time when they expect to sell the current main residence.

    Tax planning was the key
     
    Last edited: 16th Oct, 2018
    Terry_w likes this.

Build Passive Income WITHOUT Dropping $15K On Buyers Agents Each Time! Helping People Achieve PASSIVE INCOME Using Our Unique Data-Driven System, So You Can Confidently Buy Top 5% Growth & Cashflow Property, Anywhere In Australia