leanfire vs fatfire

Discussion in 'Financial Independence, Retire Early (FIRE)' started by Momentum, 11th Oct, 2019.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Momentum

    Momentum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    303
    Location:
    Collins Street, Melbourne
  2. Hodor

    Hodor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,802
    Location:
    Homeless
    The descriptions are in the links you provided.

    Lean FIRE - "For those that want to approach the problem of financial independence from a minimalist, stoic, frugal, or anti-consumerist trajectory."

    Fat FIRE - "Retire with a fat stash."

    Why do you ask?
     
  3. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,754
    Location:
    Sydney
    Lean FIRE is retiring on 40-50k in OZ...whilst fat FIRE is anything over 100k.

    60-80k is considered comfortable.

    A lot of people like talking about getting over 60k per annum to retire but very few people do...something like less than 5% of retirees do. That should give you context.
     
    oracle, TAJ, Momentum and 1 other person like this.
  4. kitdoctor

    kitdoctor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    31st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    201
    Location:
    Darwin
    Glad I stumbled in here. I can use these new words and impress my sister with them right now over coffee.
     
    qak likes this.
  5. zyea

    zyea Member

    Joined:
    4th Oct, 2019
    Posts:
    5
    Location:
    Melbourne
    LeanFIRE: Can retire and survive, but no luxuries and many compromises (most likely never eating out or taking holidays that aren't sleeping in the boot at a free campsite).
    FIRE: Able to sustain current (middle class) lifestyle for at least 25 years. No major changes needed
    FatFIRE: Able to ramp up expenses to include business class flights, 5 star hotels, house cleaners, maybe a yatch or 2.
     
  6. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,754
    Location:
    Sydney
    Mate I all for FatFIRE...and the yatch or 2....I don't like yachts.

    On a more serious note....that is exactly where I am at ...FatFIRE you only need about 100k for 2...but no yachts though....
     
    Redwing likes this.
  7. virgo

    virgo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    295
    Location:
    Sydney

    Wa...so many new acronyms......

    I am OBESE FIRE then:)...(so ..so proud of my new found vocabulary!):D
     
  8. TAJ

    TAJ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Oct, 2017
    Posts:
    563
    Location:
    Northern NSW
    My retirement income will lie between 78 - 82k nett.
    It is comprised of Super pension drawdown (twice monthly payment), rental income (3 properties) and dividend payments from LIC's, which obviously vary. This is for myself only.
    Having had a successful business provided this outcome. Was it easy? Not at all!
    Not wavering from the plan is the tricky bit. But now that I have retired, life is just great and the sacrifices made along the way have paled into insignificance.
    Moderate Flame does me fine!
     
    Burgs, Bunbury, oracle and 3 others like this.
  9. skater

    skater Capitalist -- www.skatepro.com.au

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,075
    Location:
    Sydney
    Agree, not a lot do, but it really isn't that hard. The important thing to note is that for most, it's not quick. These things take time and you must consistently work on it, not go "oh, lovely. I've got a lot of equity, I'll sell that property so I can go on a nice holiday".
     
    TAJ likes this.
  10. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,754
    Location:
    Sydney
    Well that depends whether it is after tax.

    Remember this is income after taxes....and other expenses.

    I will comfortable hit 100k after tax...but as time goes on it will increase. Once draw down on Super happens..I am looking at over 200k in today's dollars.
     
  11. virgo

    virgo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    295
    Location:
    Sydney
    Doesn't everyone calculate on basis of After Tax? :rolleyes:
    Bulk in 2 SMSFs (don't ask me why 2...long story:()
     
  12. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,754
    Location:
    Sydney
    Congrats ...you are one of the 3% of retirees....
    Nope...most don't...and some think that is gross before expenses.

    As for SMSF...my condolences....I know some people have a few mil trapped there..but can't access till 60. :D I am just moving into Super..and plan to hit the $1.6m cap...but risk is there gubbermint can change things. The other thing about super is the withdrawal rate increase as you age till you hit about 10%! But none the less you can have $3.2m in super....and draw down about 4% from 60-70 so on $3.2m you draw down 160k...and then 5% from 70 so on. I think the numbers are correct. But some of it can be waste as super income is tax free for the moment...thus why I left a lot outside of super because I have a lot in depreciation which negates tax dollar for dollar plus the tax free threshold of 18.5k. So 80k depreciation plus 18.5k tax free threshold gives you 98k tax free. Add to say another 70k in super tax free. You have about 168.5k tax free!!

    Its all about structuring......:D And if you have another 50k. You can still put in 25k in super and pay 6k in tax and have an income of 213k net income!
     
    Anne11 likes this.
  13. virgo

    virgo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    295
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi Sash

    I am surprised at these low %...where are you getting these numbers from ..may i ask?:)
     
  14. Redwing

    Redwing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,109
    Location:
    WA
    DIRE movement

    Delay, Inherit, Retire, Expire

    upload_2019-10-21_19-12-59.png

    My retirement - celebrated by installing a new pool in the backyard
     
    Jamie Moore, Niche and Burgs like this.
  15. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,754
    Location:
    Sydney
    I read this some time ago...will try to find the article.

    The average combined super of retirees is less than $400k at the moment...most have much less. Some will have to do the fine balance between selling their main house and putting more into super but risk going over the threshold for assets.

    The full pension for a couple is about 34k.....so if they had about 400k in super...they would have about 50k in income if they structured things. But this is at 65-67 when they can get access to super.

    For self funded retirees ...it is actually harder work...as they are reliant on their assets returning consistent income.

    I prefer 3 pillar for income:

    1. Shares/ETFs/LICs outside super
    2. Super
    3. Properties
    4. Other investments.