Interesting paper - accumulation index returns 1888-1987

Discussion in 'Sharemarket News & Market Analysis' started by Ross36, 3rd Mar, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Ross36

    Ross36 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    591
    Location:
    Cane Toad Country
    Hi all,

    This may have already come up before, but I found this and thought it was very interesting. An academic from the University of Melbourne did a by-decade breakdown of how Australian shares have performed each decade from 1888-1987:

    https://www.finsia.com/docs/default-source/jassa-new/jassa-2006/3_2006_equity_returns.pdf?sfvrsn=6

    The key highlight for very long term investors:

    "In 1962, W.D. Owen used historical data over the period 1883–1960 to estimate the total return from Australian equities at 11.5% per annum. He was concerned with an estimate of future long-term returns. Using information that subsequently became available, this estimate should be reduced to 9.5% per annum to allow for his use of unweighted dividend yields. In the 45 years that have elapsed since this paper was written, the geometric mean return has been 10.8% per annum. It is remarkable that an estimate made 45 years ago with the data then available turns out to have been in the right ball-park."

    It shows how an index tracking LIC/ETF for very long term investment should be a pretty sound and quite consistent investment despite the short/medium term fluctuations.
     
    Kat, Snowball, Anne11 and 3 others like this.
  2. Ross Forrester

    Ross Forrester Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    2,085
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    Only half of the people can beat an index.

    Put in costs and the number is lower.

    I love indexing.
     
    Redwing, Terry_w and Bunlee like this.
  3. Hodor

    Hodor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,238
    Location:
    Homeless
    Everyone as a whole can only get market returns minus costs. The split above and below (before costs) doesn't need to be 50/50.
     
  4. Redwing

    Redwing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,479
    Location:
    WA
    Yep, trading is expensive, trying to time the market can be expensive and taxes and costs can drag on performance