How much income do you need to live the dream?

Discussion in 'Investment Strategy' started by sash, 20th Jul, 2015.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
?

Who NET income do you need to live the dream?

  1. Less than $35k

    5 vote(s)
    3.3%
  2. 35k to 60k

    15 vote(s)
    9.9%
  3. 60k to 80k

    18 vote(s)
    11.8%
  4. 80k to 100k

    18 vote(s)
    11.8%
  5. 100k to 120k

    35 vote(s)
    23.0%
  6. 120k to 150k

    14 vote(s)
    9.2%
  7. 150k to 180k

    10 vote(s)
    6.6%
  8. 180k to 200k

    2 vote(s)
    1.3%
  9. 200k plus..

    35 vote(s)
    23.0%
  1. MTR

    MTR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,859
    Location:
    My World

    A very good post.
    Make the most of each day and live in the moment, I know cliche.. But very true
     
  2. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    OK here goes....

    Step by step....

    1. Determine the income you need...
    2. Work out how many properties and amount of shares to get to this figure.
    3. And then model this based on what you have to invest and how long it will take to get there. Use savings, growth rates of IPs, and rental growth. You should then be able to get a view on how long this will take. Modelling on worst, mid, and best case scenarios will also you assess and revise you modelling every year.

     
  3. miximitosis

    miximitosis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    215
    Location:
    QLD
    I've done any approximation on these things in terms of what asset base would be required at say a 4% yield (eg fully franked dividends). Other than looking at historical (10 year) capital growth for any area is there any other method to predict future CG?
     
    WattleIdo likes this.
  4. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    No...remember past growth is not a good predictor.

    However, looking at major infrastructure such as rail corridors, major shopping centres, business parks, and hospitals are a better predictor of growth. Growth may not happen immediately...but over 5-10 years it will if they (infrastructure) have been approved.

    The other thing is to look at suburbs which have boomed and look at the suburbs around it...are they 20-30% less..if so why...if there is no good reason snap it up.

    I love the way you have used 4%....that is the 4% rule...excellent benchmark for a endless income over the coming years. I will post on this shortly.

     
    miximitosis likes this.
  5. miximitosis

    miximitosis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    215
    Location:
    QLD
    How do you predict what growth you can expect from infrastructure though?
     
    WattleIdo likes this.
  6. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    No one knows...but to give you an example:

    Wellard WA....put a deposit on a house land package for 310k in 2014....for a 3x2x2...train station was in but town centre was being built. Once Woolies was the anchor tenant other shops followed. This was the PEET estate. ...completed in 2013...completed in 2014 Oct. End value was $425k..currently rented for $420pw.



     
  7. Chabs

    Chabs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    577
    Location:
    Sydney
    My goal is to be getting about 80-100k (in 2015 $) a year through a combination of income generating assets & a non full time job, ideally a remote one.

    Has anybody here heard of the 4% rule? Essentially, assuming your net assets grow by 6% or more p.a., then you may pull out 4% to fund your lifestyle whilst ensuring your assets are inflation proof (net assets still go up at inflation rate or higher).

    edit: I realise now, after writing my post, that the 4% rule has already been brought up....

    To add a little for discussion, assuming I want 90k pa., then taking that as 4% of assets, I need 2.25mill in net assets. When you consider there are funds like vanguard that are prepared to guarantee a 7% return on investment, you don't even need to rely on property!
     
  8. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yes the 4% rule is where it has been proven over time that 4% of an asset base will return endless returns...so long as you draw down 4%.

    So if you have $1m in the bank drawing 4% will give you 4% + indexation for the rest of your life. So if we assume inflation is a flat 2%. The the drawdown would look something like this:

    Year 1 - $40k
    Year 2 - $40.8k
    Year 3 - $41,616
    etc.....

    Will post in a new thread now...

    Here ya go:

    https://propertychat.com.au/community/threads/4-rule-what-is-it-and-how-does-it-work.1682/

     
    Last edited: 21st Jul, 2015
  9. Chabs

    Chabs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    577
    Location:
    Sydney
    This is incredibly true, investing in yourself is the best way to improve your life. A lot of people focus on improving their financial situation, forgetting other important things. How cliche is the notion of the CEO pulling in 500k+ p.a. but who rarely sees his wife and kids at home.

    Other people focus on other things, and quickly forget that life is holistic, there is no one important thing that deserves your full devotion and attention. How often do you see people that are obsessed with improving one of: financials, fitness, lifestyle, socio-cultural status, etc. Its better to focus on everything holistically, starting with your mind!
     
    WattleIdo likes this.
  10. Big Daddy

    Big Daddy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    998
    Location:
    Perth
    One gazillion dollars
     
  11. Perthguy

    Perthguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,767
    Location:
    Perth
    My income stream when I retire will come from a mix of investments: residential housing, cash, dividends from shares and super. I don't have my equity concentrated in any asset class. My residential rent income stream is not where I want it to be yet. I have 2 development sites and fully developed, I could just sit on them until I retire and just those would give me enough income to "live the dream". But that's boring, and I don't want to be boring! :) :p
     
  12. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    OK...so how do you balance boring and risk?;)

     
  13. Perthguy

    Perthguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,767
    Location:
    Perth
    The journey is very important for me too. "Getting there" is life and I want to enjoy my life. No point getting to your destination (goal) only to think back about how miserable your journey has been. I also take your point about your loved ones. Out of the blue one of mine found out he has terminal cancer. Look after your loved ones and don't take them for granted.
     
  14. Perthguy

    Perthguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,767
    Location:
    Perth
    Make some safe investments and some "interesting" ones. ;)
     
  15. sanj

    sanj Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,471
    Location:
    Perth

    i have to disagree with this. with $25m in net quality investments it would be a pretty woeful return to just get $1m a year. why do so many people assume that low yielding resi property is the only place for money? you'd surely be putting money into a mix of high and low risk investments with that kind of capital


    with regards to the topic at hand, personally i think a really good lifestyle would be$150-200k as a single person, great/dream would be higher.

    im single and only 33 so once im married and have kids the figure would be higher for the dream lifestyle
     
  16. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yep....that is the return on quality stuff ...about 5% ...I used 4% to be conservative....that is only the yield...once is now considering the potential growth as with shares. With just say 4% growth on $25m is $1m...something to ponder...

     
  17. sanj

    sanj Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,471
    Location:
    Perth
    $
    3-5 years for $250k passive-ish, 7-10 for a fair bit higher.

    ill always keep doing active things though as i love what i do in the various businesses and industries. we're living in an age of immense opportunity, there's always more opportunity than time or capital to act on them imo

    ultimately as mentioned above money is just one part of life, there's no point placing it above everything else that is important as theres no point being the most miserable rich ******* around
     
  18. sanj

    sanj Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,471
    Location:
    Perth
    we're discussing income here so capital growth is irrelevant.

    ill be honest, if at the end of it all im only making 5% return on my total invested $$ ill be thoroughly disappointed
     
  19. sash

    sash Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    15,663
    Location:
    Sydney
    I like being disappointed...I am like a retailer...small margins...but great net income on a large asset base which drives the value of the business.

    Risks vs Return scenario...I like playing small ponds but like to be the big fish.;)

     
  20. Random Username

    Random Username Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    296
    Location:
    NSW
    Well it's better than being the most miserable poor *******.