How high will our unemployment rate go?

Discussion in 'Property Market Economics' started by TMNT, 23rd Mar, 2020.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
?

How high will our unemployment rate go?

  1. 5%-8%

    4 vote(s)
    2.5%
  2. 9%-12%

    52 vote(s)
    32.3%
  3. 13%-16%

    49 vote(s)
    30.4%
  4. 17%-20%

    34 vote(s)
    21.1%
  5. 21%-24%

    7 vote(s)
    4.3%
  6. 25%-28%

    4 vote(s)
    2.5%
  7. 29%+

    11 vote(s)
    6.8%
  1. AlphabetSoup

    AlphabetSoup Active Member

    Joined:
    21st Mar, 2020
    Posts:
    40
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    I know of two people who only lost their jobs in this past week. I think there is more pain to come. A domino effect will begin.

    I don't really trust the unemployment rate due to its narrow criteria. If people give up on looking for work, the unemployment rate goes down (decreased workforce participation).

    I'm glad more people are paying attention to underemployment these days. High underemployment explains why we can have wage stagnation while the unemployment rate is supposedly low.
     
  2. jim1964

    jim1964 1941

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,300
    Location:
    Westcoster Strahan Tasmania
    I was working for the 2nd biggest builder in S.A.They made 15 people redundant late February, including me.Tough times ahead.
     
  3. TMNT

    TMNT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    5,572
    Location:
    Melbourne
    also, consider how many businesses will close up when jobkeeper finishes
     
    Peter2013 likes this.
  4. craigc

    craigc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2016
    Posts:
    1,594
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Please refer to Jobkeeper rules on the ATO website I have previously advised you.
    1) Incorrect - If a person is made redundant they are no longer an eligible employee (most identified through STP). Jobkeeper requires the employee to be paid ongoing a minimum of $1500 per fortnight.
    If made redundant the employer can no longer receive Jobkeeper for that redundant employee to pay towards redundancy payouts.

    2) this is possible

    3) this is possible.
     
  5. 2FAST4U

    2FAST4U Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    2,304
    Location:
    Democratic People's Republic of Australia
    Sorry to hear that and I hope you find something soon if you haven't already.
     
  6. Foxdan

    Foxdan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    457
    Location:
    Hills district, sydney
    Do you even read what people write? It says you can use the job keeper to pay out a retrenchment period? Ie you can use jobkeeper to pay for their last few weeks of employment.
    I suggest you keep your advice to something you know about.
     
  7. jim1964

    jim1964 1941

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,300
    Location:
    Westcoster Strahan Tasmania
    Thanks, i am more worried for the building contracts in place.
     
  8. Peter2013

    Peter2013 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Aug, 2019
    Posts:
    230
    Location:
    NSW
    Jobkeeper is the life support system. The real challenge will be when life support is turned off.
     
    MTR likes this.
  9. Peter2013

    Peter2013 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Aug, 2019
    Posts:
    230
    Location:
    NSW
    A lot of Adelaide builders have gone to the wall over the last two years. At one stage, there was a builder going broke each week.

    Now conditions are even worse. Boral has shut a roofing plant today and will close a cement kiln in June as there is no demand.
     
  10. craigc

    craigc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    25th Jun, 2016
    Posts:
    1,594
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I‘d suggest I do but obviously you don’t.

    I have referred you to the ATO and the legislation before which obviously you haven’t read. Then you claimed your exact quotation was ‘taken out of context’. Lol.

    To be clear - once an employee is terminated they are no longer an eligible employee.

    See ATO website:

    Your eligible employees

    Employees who have been terminated
    If you terminated an employee after 1 March 2020, you can re-engage them and they will be eligible if they met the eligibility criteria on 1 March 2020.

    If you want to claim the JobKeeper payment for employees you have re-engaged, you will need to:

    • confirm they want to be re-hired and participate in the JobKeeper Payment Scheme
    Also try sections 2.3 & 2.4 of the NTAA Jobkeeper release:
    https://ntaa.com.au/media/coronavirus-news/2020/858/the-jobkeeper-payment-scheme

    So your previous quote is again incorrect. Employees who are terminated must be re-employed & paid a minimum of $1500 per fortnight to be potentially eligible for Jobkeeper.


    “1. All businesses that can’t keep staff will terminate them once jobkeeper nearly up and use jobkeeper to pay out any retrenchment periods“


    If the employee receives an eligible termination payment, they may also be tax free to the employee depending on Individual circumstances.

    You are now changing your position to their last few weeks before the termination date - this would be eligible as they are still employed and it is not paying out a retrenchment period.

    I will accept your apology here, but if as I expect it is not forthcoming, please refrain from trolling and also providing incorrect information to other forum users purporting it to be as fact.
    Some may not be aware of the correct information.

    Have a nice weekend and enjoy the sunshine! ☀️
     
  11. Butterfly88

    Butterfly88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    11th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    156
    Location:
    Sydney
    Breaking ... Treasury has admitted "significant mistakes" in JobKeeper reporting. Number of people on JobKeeper closer to 3.5m rather than more than 6m. Cost likely to be $70 billion rather than $60 billion. Update on SMH/Age soon...
     
    Biggbird likes this.
  12. Biggbird

    Biggbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    4th Feb, 2020
    Posts:
    137
    Location:
    Hobart
    Fewer people but more cost? Interesting.
     
  13. Butterfly88

    Butterfly88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    11th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    156
    Location:
    Sydney
    Looks like this tweet was wrong now from David Speers: Breaking: Big revision on JobKeeper numbers. Treasury & ATO say a reporting error by around 1,000 businesses, means they can now revise DOWN the number of recipients from 6.5m to 3.5m. JobKeeper now estimated to cost taxpayer $70b instead of $130b.
     
  14. MTR

    MTR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,856
    Location:
    My World

    Thats exactly right..... we haven’t seen anything yet

    More bad news, and this is happening practically every month, someone shutting shop


    Up to 75 Target stores to close in massive restructure
     
  15. MTR

    MTR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,856
    Location:
    My World
    sorry to hear this

    my daughter was made redundant last week, its a worry

    hope
     
  16. Property Baron

    Property Baron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5th May, 2019
    Posts:
    1,448
    Location:
    NSW
    Unbelievable mistake! just unbelievable how can they get it that wrong!
     
    Butterfly88 likes this.
  17. MC1

    MC1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    386
    Location:
    Melbourne
    MTR, you could be the next Martin North. Your doom and gloom over the past few weeks is getting hard to bear
     
    MTR likes this.
  18. Butterfly88

    Butterfly88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    11th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    156
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yep. Makes you wonder what other figures they are getting wrong. Others less scrutinized..
     
  19. MTR

    MTR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,856
    Location:
    My World

    Lol
    Sorry, did not mean to be so negative

    I did vote 9%-12% unemployment, looking at this poll, similar to most here
     
    MC1 likes this.
  20. 2FAST4U

    2FAST4U Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    2,304
    Location:
    Democratic People's Republic of Australia
    JobKeeper numbers overestimated by 3 million because of mistakes on application forms

    "The number of people on JobKeeper has been revised down by 3 million, with Treasury and the Australian Tax Office (ATO) blaming businesses for making "significant errors" in their applications.

    The estimated cost of the program has been nearly halved from $130 billion to about $70 billion".

    It's always somebody else's fault just like when the Centrelink site crashed it was blamed on hackers. A day later it turned out that the site wasn't built to handle the unusually high volume of users.