Does "Setback Area" include property boundary

Discussion in 'Development' started by BlcokMeOut, 26th Aug, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. BlcokMeOut

    BlcokMeOut Active Member

    Joined:
    12th May, 2018
    Posts:
    32
    Location:
    Sydney
    My lot is a flood control lot and a corner block. It means that I need approval for installing fences.

    I am considering getting a CDC approval for fencing, but below clause in the complying development code for attached development scares me out.

    "Despite subclause (2) (a), any fence located in the setback area of a primary or secondary road must not be higher than 1.2m above ground level (existing)." (subclause (2)(a) says fence height can be up to 1.8m behind building line).

    My questions is whether "in the setback area" includes "along the boundary" or not? Basically, if I install a fence along the boundary of the secondary st, can it be 1.8m or it has to be 1.2m all the way?

    I tried contacting some PCAs, but they refuse to answer my question unless some fee is paid.

    Regards

    James Gao
     
  2. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,225
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Sounds like a side fence can only exceed 1.2m behind the building alignment ie outside of the setback distance.
     
    Anthony416 likes this.
  3. Anthony416

    Anthony416 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Dec, 2015
    Posts:
    538
    Location:
    Sydney
    Agree with Scott No Mates, if you wanted a bit different you may be able to go the DA route for more flexibility but more cost. Maybe get a DA quote from council to compare with a PCA via CDC quote?
     
  4. BlcokMeOut

    BlcokMeOut Active Member

    Joined:
    12th May, 2018
    Posts:
    32
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks. What I do not crack is that how come CDC requires 1.2m for both primary and secondary st where I see almost ever corner block has 1.8m fence on the secondary st boundary.
     
  5. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,225
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    The driver of a car cannot see through a 1.8m high fence, hence the requirement from the building alignment. You can't see through the building either.
     
  6. BlcokMeOut

    BlcokMeOut Active Member

    Joined:
    12th May, 2018
    Posts:
    32
    Location:
    Sydney
    I get it that the side street fence in front of building line should be 1.2m, which is ok. I don't understand is why CDC requires the full length of side street boundary fence to be 1.2m, which leaves no private space for a corner block.
     
  7. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,225
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    It relates to the primary setback. Worst case scenario, you will need the side fence to have the same secondary setback as the house to have a 1.8m high side fence though that doesn't make sense.
     
  8. Ethan Timor

    Ethan Timor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Nov, 2016
    Posts:
    154
    Location:
    Australia
    1.2m + bamboos (ideally clamping) = privacy issue sorted (if that’s the main motive for a higher fence?)