Divorce: what's the split?

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by Bran, 30th Oct, 2016.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. Bran

    Bran Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,626
    Location:
    At work
    Are there any current ballpark figures as to the split of assets? Future income?

    Let's say non-working wife and 3 kids... 3 properties left
    50/50 TIC
    90/10 TIC
    100% disc trust

    cash
    shares
    super

    Anywhere I can read about this stuff?
     
  2. Joynz

    Joynz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5th Apr, 2016
    Posts:
    5,755
    Location:
    Melbourne
    You can reach an amicable agreement for any split. Otherwise the court will decide:

    Property and finances after separation - Family Court of Australia

    Depends on factors such as who the kids live with.

    If kids live with income earning partner, then less to other partner. Also depends on other assets such as super etc. No one size fits all.

    A wife or husband who has largely been working in the home to support the family will have lost a lot of super and this will be taken into account.
     
    Last edited: 30th Oct, 2016
    legallyblonde likes this.
  3. 158

    158 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,275
    Location:
    Brisbane, Qld
    The split is somewhere in the vicinity of the following:

    Lawyers: 50%
    Remaining divorced couple: The broken pieces after the lawyers bite.


    pinkboy
     
    Luke T, Whitecat, JacM and 14 others like this.
  4. Joynz

    Joynz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    5th Apr, 2016
    Posts:
    5,755
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Lots of couples arrange things privately without lawyers.
     
    Whitecat likes this.
  5. thatbum

    thatbum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    5,850
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    A ballpark % split is actually almost always highly technical family law advice. Even for me to take a stab at it I would need quite a lot of information, and I do it for a living.

    The % of TIC ownership is almost always irrelevant btw, as is the structuring of most family trusts to the final % split.

    A starting point of some of the most important info would be:

    1. Length of the marriage and de facto relationship
    2. Value of current asset pool and the big assets that are in it
    3. Current incomes and/or earning capacities of the parties
    4. Ages and care arrangements for the children
    5. What assets the parties brought into the start of the relationship

    There's still a lot of other important information though...
     
    Perthguy, legallyblonde, 158 and 2 others like this.
  6. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,978
    Location:
    Australia wide
    And the financial and non-financial contributions of the parties.
     
  7. KayTea

    KayTea Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    10th Aug, 2015
    Posts:
    1,204
    Location:
    Inside my head
    Avoid the courts, where possible (the fees, and timeline to get things sorted are mind boggling). But is very rarely a 50/50 split, and it really is a case-by-case scenario. Having had to deal with it twice - once for myself, and once for getting my now-husbands finances settled when his ex-wife refused to settle (although she'd walked out on him 4 years earlier) - it's a very yucky situation. I hope you can get it sorted.
     
    Luke T and JacM like this.
  8. Barny

    Barny Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    3,191
    Location:
    Australia

    Could you come up with an average joe and jane scenario, ($$$)you have seen many times and have a stab at it. Just as entertainment for this thread
    Say after 1 year split, 5 year, and 10 year?
     
  9. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,978
    Location:
    Australia wide
    What about two spouses on a long term relationship of 27 years where they keep finances separate to each other. There may be no property settlement - ie each keeps their own assets.
     
  10. beachgurl

    beachgurl Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,320
    Location:
    Sydney
    I'd say it would start at 60/40. Then factor in what each of you brought to the relationship which will tip the percentage higher or lower toward the one with the premarital assets.
     
  11. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,245
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    Unless the other party needs to be maintained in the manner that they have become accustomed.
     
    Luke T and Whitecat like this.
  12. Marg4000

    Marg4000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,417
    Location:
    Qld
    When several young children are involved I have known it to be 70/30.
    Marg
     
  13. jim1964

    jim1964 1941

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,300
    Location:
    Westcoster Strahan Tasmania
    Or in my case 90/10(me) with 2 small kids, 50/50(no kids, 50/50(no kids).
     
    Bran likes this.
  14. Barny

    Barny Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    3,191
    Location:
    Australia
    Jim did you go into the relationship with assists? Or only what you built up together?
     
  15. RPI

    RPI SDA Provider, Town Planner, Former Property Lawyer

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,025
    Location:
    Brisbane
    If you can agree on it amicably then you:
    1. save a lot of money;
    2. don't waste your time having to hang out with lawyers;
    3. start moving forward.

    Consent order stamped by the court and the property side is done.
     
    Luke T, Whitecat, hobo and 1 other person like this.
  16. Marg4000

    Marg4000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,417
    Location:
    Qld
    And if you had the assets, were they fully paid off?

    Man hubby worked with owned a house when he got married. Divorced about 15 years later and claimed the house was his as "I already had it when we were married". Quite true, but it was mortgaged above 90% at the time and both worked to pay it off. He could not see that made any difference, and was quite bitter when its value was included in joint assets.
    Marg
     
    Barny likes this.
  17. willair

    willair Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    6,795
    Location:
    ....UKI nth nsw ....
    There are a few small bars that the legal people drink at each day in Brisbane after a hard day wearing the silk wig and walking up from their chambers ,you hear some interesting stories after 4 pints about the facts and who wins..
     
  18. Stoffo

    Stoffo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jul, 2016
    Posts:
    5,330
    Location:
    In the Tweed
    True (the lucky one's)

    But don't you each have to get independent legal advice on any private agreement prior to presenting to court for the rubber stamp ?
     
  19. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,978
    Location:
    Australia wide
    no
     
  20. Westminster

    Westminster Tigress at Tiger Developments Business Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    11,356
    Location:
    Perth
    Bran, I hope this isn't for you!! Hugs if it is.
     
    Sonamic, samiam and EN710 like this.