Design & Town Planning Fees

Discussion in 'Development' started by opal3259, 20th Oct, 2015.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. opal3259

    opal3259 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    13th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    144
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Great advice and agreed Aaron.
    Learning more by the day.

    I had a look at a site yesterday, where they squeezed 3 townhouses onto a small lot.

    Taking a tour through the property... I couldn't help but think they would have achieved a better result doing 2 instead of 3.

    Spaces were cramped, not a lot of natural light, low ceilings etc.
    Felt a lot more like a multi-level apartment than a legitimate townhouse.

    Here's a question for the more experienced developers out there.

    If you've got a long term strategy of holding the bulk of your developments, do you feel it makes sense to achieve a lower unit yield to achieve better capital growth?

    In other words, hold 3 townhouses that are more spacious vs 4 small ones?
    Questions questions questions :)
     
  2. AndrewTDP

    AndrewTDP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    764
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Having 2.7m ceilings instead of 2.4m for downstairs living areas does wonders for improving the feel of a place
     
    wylie, Ethan Timor and Tufan Chakir like this.
  3. sanj

    sanj Well-Known Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,471
    Location:
    Perth
    Completely agree. Unless im building a really low specced dump (and even then possibly not ) i cannot see any justification for building 2400 ceilings.

    It's from the same school of thought as black tiled roofs with inadequate insulationn
     
  4. Aaron Sice

    Aaron Sice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,588
    Location:
    Ocean Reef, WA
    i would always prefer lesser number better quality than more of less.

    For example, I would prefer to hold four 4bed townhouses rather than five 3bed townhouses.

    Or four bigger 3bed townhouses with a larger courtyard and upstairs balconies.

    Many developers forget that someone actually has to live in them.
     
  5. Aaron Sice

    Aaron Sice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,588
    Location:
    Ocean Reef, WA
    I did Wes Barrett ' s folks place. It's a Topsy-turvy world!
     
  6. Tufan Chakir

    Tufan Chakir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Aug, 2016
    Posts:
    877
    Location:
    Victoria, Australia
    This conversation is old now, but my offering - use a town planner. "If the need arises" is usually too late - the damage is done, Council staff have already formed their view.

    Do it right the first time. Engage professional people to do a professional job right from the start.

    Planning services aren't expensive but fixing up a problem can be.

    Sure a designer can achieve a result, but are you going to get the best possbile result?
     
  7. Iamnumber5

    Iamnumber5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    31st Dec, 2015
    Posts:
    352
    Location:
    australia
    That is looking very efficient way of utilizing the land. I am curious if this is the more optimal way of creating yield if the owner keeps them all as ip.

    Looking forward for some feedback to this question too
     
  8. Manic

    Manic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    23rd Nov, 2015
    Posts:
    61
    Location:
    Melbourne
    To revive this thread, how did you go with town planning fees. I was quoted approx 18k for 3 townhouses. I was told build permit fees are separate and can cost about $20k on top of that...does that sound about right?
     
  9. Tufan Chakir

    Tufan Chakir Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Aug, 2016
    Posts:
    877
    Location:
    Victoria, Australia
    Seems well over the top for the whole package.
     
  10. Anthony416

    Anthony416 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Dec, 2015
    Posts:
    538
    Location:
    Sydney
    Does seem a bit high....
     
  11. Doculus

    Doculus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st May, 2016
    Posts:
    70
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Wondering of anyone can provide some advice about the best way to approach the DA process. I have been using a town planner (TP) to drive my DAs with the architect/drafty drawing up the plans at the instruction of the TP.

    Problem is thst is costs me a fortune as the TP costs between $140-$340/hr depending on who is doing what. Mostly it is $140/hr. The archit is only $60/hr.

    The TP gave me an estimate of costs (not a fixed price) but they were grossly inaccurate.

    I am trying to workout if I should have the archi preparing the documentation and submissions and just have the TP weigh in when needed e.g. SOEE, rather than preparing reports etc.

    I don't mind paying for good advice but it stings to get the kinds of bills I have been paying over the DA period.

    What are your thoughts? How do you go about your DA process?
     
  12. RPI

    RPI SDA Provider, Town Planner, Former Property Lawyer

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,025
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Find a town planner that does fixed fees.
     
    Doculus likes this.
  13. Anthony416

    Anthony416 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Dec, 2015
    Posts:
    538
    Location:
    Sydney
    Firstly, what is the ratio of time spent on the project by the TP compared to the architect? Secondly you are fortunate to have an architect at $60/hr (my motor mechanic charges $110/hr to change the oil in my car :(
     
  14. RPI

    RPI SDA Provider, Town Planner, Former Property Lawyer

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,025
    Location:
    Brisbane
    At $60 - are you sure they are an architect? That is not enough to cover an architects wage as an employee, let alone run a business.
     
    Tufan Chakir and Anthony416 like this.
  15. Sackie

    Sackie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    25,059
    Location:
    Vaucluse, Sydney.
    I get a fixed fee from my TP and Architect and then have them closely work together at the DA stage to make sure any prelim drawings needed will satisfy council's requirements at each stage. I never try to cut corners with a good TP and good architect.
     
    Doculus and Tufan Chakir like this.
  16. Doculus

    Doculus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st May, 2016
    Posts:
    70
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Technically he is a designer - has B Architecture. But he is very competent amd very busy as you can imagine at that price!
     
  17. Doculus

    Doculus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st May, 2016
    Posts:
    70
    Location:
    Newcastle
    Yes I agree, that is the way it has worked with me as well, but a fixed fee is the way to go and my mistake in the past where I have been given an estimate rather than fixed price.

    Need to put the burden back onto those professionals to work within the fixed price rather than it being open slather with no incentive to be efficient, but every incentive to do the opposite. A fixed price will fix that. Ill put it down to a lack of experience on my part.

    Have been there done that with El Cheapos and it doesn't end well.

    Thanks for your suggestions.
     
    Tufan Chakir likes this.
  18. Doculus

    Doculus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st May, 2016
    Posts:
    70
    Location:
    Newcastle
    The TP definitely doing the bulk of the work 70/30 - which is why I was thinking it might be better to have the Archi drive it and have the TP weigh in as needed.
     

PFI can assist you with your investment strategies for your SMSF, Life Cover for your members and assistance with compliance. We provide the research to ensure your investment selections achieve the goals. This is the value of advice