Certificate of currency - new lender wants to increase

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by 2155, 25th Jul, 2015.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. 2155

    2155 Member

    Joined:
    16th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    8
    Location:
    Perth
    In the process of refinancing atm. The new lender has asked for a certificate of currency (insurance policy) for an amount that is a lot more than what our home is currently insured for. (ok I admit we are probably a bit underinsured....)

    They want the amount to be $444k (desktop valuation, so I guess based on size and area etc). We're happy to increase the amount to maybe $350k .... are we able to negotiate with them at all? *sigh ... didn't realize how much there is to refinancing :(
     
  2. Gockie

    Gockie Life is good ☺️ Premium Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    14,789
    Location:
    Sydney
    Name and shame. Which lender?
     
  3. DaveM

    DaveM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,761
    Location:
    Adelaide & Sydney
    The valuer would have put a reinstatement value on it. You want the money you have to jump through their hoops. If the lender says your house is a pineapple on the floor of the ocean, you say "yes sir it is" otherwise you get no money.
     
    Tim86, Perp and hotmail like this.
  4. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,985
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Probably not negotiable.
     
    Perp likes this.
  5. Bran

    Bran Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,626
    Location:
    At work
    I'm confused.

    You want the bank to accept the valuation and give you the money based on this.

    But you won't insure the item that the bank is financing at this value, and even you admit that you are underinsured.

    And you want to negotiate that the value of your home is actually less than the desktop valuation?

    Pay the insurance. It's a no-brainer.
     
    wylie and Perp like this.
  6. Perp

    Perp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    735
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Why would you deliberately under-insure? o_O
     
    wylie and Chilliblue like this.
  7. Chilliblue

    Chilliblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,605
    Location:
    Australia
    Agree with Perp. For the few extra $$ pa it does not make sense.
     
  8. Perp

    Perp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    735
    Location:
    Brisbane
    It's worth noting that insuring your house for $500K does not cost anything like twice as much as insuring it for $250K; as Chilliblue says, you're not talking a lot of money.

    Why? Because most claims are not for total loss; they're for a tree through the roof in a storm, or things like that, and those claims cost the same for a $500K property as a $250K property.

    It's sensible to tend towards over- rather than under-insuring.
     
    Jamie Moore likes this.
  9. Jamie Moore

    Jamie Moore MORTGAGE BROKER - AUSTRALIA WIDE Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,980
    Location:
    Canberra, Brisbane and Sunshine Coast
    Agree with Perp - sounds like it makes sense to up the cover and pay a little bit more. The bank isn't going to negotiate on this anyway - so if you want to complete the refi you'll need to get it sorted.

    Cheers

    Jamie
     
    Perp likes this.
  10. 2155

    2155 Member

    Joined:
    16th Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    8
    Location:
    Perth
    Cheers peeps :) used an online calculator and it doesn't cost that much more, thought it was going to be double our insurance amount :eek:
     
    Perp likes this.
  11. Corey Batt

    Corey Batt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,091
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
    Really common to see some particularly high insurance val req's (many cover more than the build component, but the entire value of the property), but in the end you have to follow the Golden Rules:

    1. The Bank has the money
    2. The Bank makes the rules
    3. If you want the banks money you play by their rules
     
    Perp likes this.