Can plaintiff come after personal guarantor assets?

Discussion in 'Legal Issues' started by overtaker, 10th May, 2021.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
Tags:
  1. overtaker

    overtaker Active Member

    Joined:
    9th May, 2021
    Posts:
    33
    Location:
    Darwin
    Hi all

    Newbie here, have searched around but couldn't find answer to the question I have in mind which is somewhat similar to the situation described here. Anyone have knowledge in situation like this:

    Let's say in summary I purchased a property under a discretionary trust with a company as trustee. I am the director and provides personal guarantee on the loan to buy the property.
    The roof of the property fell off and injured the tenant, now the tenant is suing for amount much higher than the price of the property.
    Would my personal assets be at risk as a personal guarantor to the loan?

    thanks
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,917
    Location:
    Australia wide
    The company purchased with you as director.

    The personal guarantee relates only to the loan and given to the lender. The guarantor is not giving any guarantees to other credits of the company.
    But that doesn't mean the director is not liable. They could still be liable by other legislation especially in relation to OHS type issues.
     
    overtaker and Perp like this.
  3. Simon Hampel

    Simon Hampel Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    3rd Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    12,412
    Location:
    Sydney
    This is why you have insurance - at least $20m of it with most building insurance policies.
     
  4. overtaker

    overtaker Active Member

    Joined:
    9th May, 2021
    Posts:
    33
    Location:
    Darwin
    Thanks everyone, that's really helpful
     
  5. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,504
    Location:
    Sydney
    If you have ever had to use that aspect of a policy the insurer will refer you to their consulting solicitors. Often a major law firm. They will aggressively defend the claim representing you and will spend a $1m to save $1m. They will pay that cost. But they work for the insurer not you. The injured party will need to fund their own case perhaps. That said the insurer may also find the claim is not covered by the policy and refuse the claim leaving you exposed. eg Declined cover through lack of disclosure about building condition. A P&B report may provide a reliable defence. A defect reported in that report may pose a concern.

    It may be wise to seek independent legal advice on the policy terms and cover. It can be wise to adopt this approach so your legal adviser advises you on how to deal with the insurers appointed legal adviser. Its seems costly but can avoid claims being denied through ignorance or error.