Buying land in joint venture to develop later

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by property_geek, 11th Apr, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. property_geek

    property_geek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    31st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    239
    Location:
    Australia
    Hi,

    Me and my friend are planning to buy two adjacent lands. We are planing to amalgamate these two lands in future for development purpose.

    If we buy now as a separate entities and then few years later decide to amalgamate, will it cost extra money in stamp duty versus we buy 2 lands now as a single entity?

    What is the best way to approach this?

    If it makes no difference, we would prefer to buy lands individually because if in future the development doesn't go as planned we should still be able to retain lands individually as separate titles.
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,984
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Yes potentially as title will change.
     
    property_geek likes this.
  3. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,649
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    Be aware that if you need to borrow, then your debt Will be considered has joint and severally liable by most lenders. This means that if you can be doing any borrowing on your own and not with your mate, you will be saddled with the entire debt not just half of it. Worse still if there's a rental income on those properties many lenders will deem you to be able to only receive your half

    So in closing, joint and several liability in this scenario would mean that your beloved for the entire debt have only half the rental income allocated to you and only half the negative gearing of the debt there are some opportunities with some lenders to get around this but they are somewhat limited.

    ta

    rolf
     
    property_geek likes this.
  4. JDM

    JDM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    465
    Location:
    Brisbane
    If you're buying now with a vague plan to develop together in the future, just buy as normal and then consider the development structure in the future.

    If you're buying because of the future development and you wouldn't buy it otherwise, you should speak with a lawyer about properly documenting (development agreement/JV agreement) and structuring the purchase from day one.

    Part of the development structure may be that you don't need to amalgamate the lots and you can develop them together under a development agreement.
     
    property_geek and Terry_w like this.
  5. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,984
    Location:
    Australia wide
    This will depend on how it is structured.
     
  6. property_geek

    property_geek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    31st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    239
    Location:
    Australia
    This would be ideal if it doesn't cost extra money anywhere in any step of the process. Could you please tell more about it?
    Let's say me and my mate own adjacent lands and we decide to build an apartment on combined land.

    Does it not require land to be on one single title before DA can be lodged? If yes, this step would incur stamp duty as @Terry_w suggested.
     
  7. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,984
    Location:
    Australia wide
    stamp duty is triggered when there is a change of ownership.
    Split Lot A into Lot A1 and LotA2 generally doesn't trigger duty if the ownership is the same.

    When building units it may be possible to eliminate or reduce duty by putting 2 in one name and 2 in the other name. as each owner will be the original owner of the land on which the units sit.

    But this will vary from state to state and will depend on the situation and require complex legal advice - but also advice on the income tax aspects too.
     
    property_geek likes this.
  8. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,528
    Location:
    Sydney
    The nature of what you propose to build will affect all of this...Lending, duty, GST, income tax and land tax issues as well as legal and liability issues all require advice before commencing. And buying in own names may or may not even be sensible if you have capacity to each split any expected profits later.

    One the key issues also may be whether interest to buy land in this instance is deductible at this time. Probably not.
     
    property_geek likes this.
  9. Tonibell

    Tonibell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,108
    Location:
    Sydney
    Nice idea - but with a lot more downside than upside.

    If you want to develop together - then go for it and set up the right structure.

    If maybe some time in the future you might want to develop together ....... forget it for now.

    Make you own investment decision and only buy a property if it stacks up on its own - or with plans that are completely within your control. Your friend should do likewise - if it turns out they are blocks of land next to each other, the maybe you will have something to discuss in the future (as you may with any other neighbour of a property you purchase).
     
    property_geek and thatbum like this.
  10. JDM

    JDM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    465
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Terry has hit the nail on the head with his post.

    It will depend on the location of the development and the structure, however it may be possible to avoid the amalgamation and go straight to a subdivision from both lots. It will also depend on what you are building. For example, a combined land or townhouse subdivision where you each keep the lots created from your own property is much simpler than where there will be a mixing of the land.

    Joint ventures like this are complex and require specific legal advice based on your individual circumstances...preferably before either of you buy the properties so that everything can be structured in the optimal way.
     
    property_geek likes this.
  11. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,528
    Location:
    Sydney
    First problem I see is that a JV is not a legal entity. It cant buy land. Only the members (or a third party :) can ) What you have is a Partnership and both could become liable jointly and severally. Your land could secure the other property and vice versa. If you friend ceases to pay their loan for whatever reason it could impact you.