“Build a portfolio that returns 7-8% p.a”

Discussion in 'Share Investing Strategies, Theories & Education' started by twix11, 15th Jul, 2021.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. twix11

    twix11 Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2020
    Posts:
    16
    Location:
    sydney
    Hi People

    “Build a share portfolio that return 7-8%” this is often what blogposts and people on youtube talk about. What exactly does that entail though?

    Does it mean you can select a few companies on the ASX that individually return 3-5% or around that and those companies cumulatively should return 7-8% + p.a.???

    Obviously these could be ETFs as well but I’m specifically sticking to whats available kn the ASX.

    Thanks!!!
     
    a’mare likes this.
  2. The Y-man

    The Y-man Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    13,523
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Really could be any of those.....

    The Y-man
     
  3. Anne11

    Anne11 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    571
    Location:
    Brisbane
    It usually means the total return ( dividend + capital growth) over the long term would be at this range.

    there are a number of ways:
    Direct shares: selecting individual stocks
    Index funds /LICs/EFTs
     
    MTR likes this.
  4. twix11

    twix11 Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2020
    Posts:
    16
    Location:
    sydney
    e.g. i was just think about investing in a bank or two, BHP and a few others which would altogether return 8% and just consistently buying into those companies.

    would this be worthwhile in terms of creating a portfolio to retire on in 30-40 years.
     
  5. Anne11

    Anne11 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    571
    Location:
    Brisbane
    I am not qualified to advise. Some people follow the direct shares path, others follow a passive approach. There are multiple threads on this topic here you can read and then form your own opinion on what’s best for you.
    Shares & Funds
     
  6. wombat777

    wombat777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,565
    Location:
    On a Capital and Income Growth Safari
    This thread has some great discussions of strategies.

    Starting my share journey
     
    MTR and Anne11 like this.
  7. twix11

    twix11 Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2020
    Posts:
    16
    Location:
    sydney
    thankyou, will have a look
     
  8. Redwing

    Redwing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    7,482
    Location:
    WA
    upload_2021-7-15_20-16-18.png

    upload_2021-7-15_20-18-51.png

    Here's an example comparing the growth of $10,000 invested in major asset classes over the last 20 odd years @twix11 (January 2000 to the end of May 2021)
     
    Beano, spoon and Islay like this.
  9. wombat777

    wombat777 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,565
    Location:
    On a Capital and Income Growth Safari
    I should add - the following are worth a read. A Dividend Aristocrat is simply a company the consistently grows dividends over time.

    Ideally the rate of growth of dividends should outpace inflation since that will mean that passive dividend income will outpace inflation.

    The second article below recommends reading the first article first, hence I have provided them in this order.

    A Fully Franked Australian Dividend Aristocrat Analysis

    Australian Dividend Aristocrats on the ASX | Capitalistic Man

    I also suggest that you do some goal setting. Rather than saying I just want to invest $X in investments A, B and C - come up with a plan for what you will start with and how often you will increase the amount of capital invested. Play around with this compound interest calculator. You will soon see how dramatically a regular top-up can affect the outcome.

    Free Compound Interest Calculator | Noel Whittaker
     
    Redwing likes this.
  10. SatayKing

    SatayKing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Sep, 2017
    Posts:
    10,777
    Location:
    Extended Sabatical
    Someone asks a simple question and then things get

    Complicated.jpg
     
  11. Ryan23

    Ryan23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    16th May, 2016
    Posts:
    224
    Location:
    Queensland
    FYI, if you buy two companies that each return 3%pa. Your total return is not 6%, it’s 3%. In case that is a but of confusion.
     
    wombat777 likes this.
  12. twix11

    twix11 Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2020
    Posts:
    16
    Location:
    sydney
    Hi Ryan

    this is actually what i was talking about. Why is it only 3%? Not 6%
     
    Ryan23 likes this.
  13. The Falcon

    The Falcon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    3,426
    Location:
    AU
    Because maths.
     
    a’mare, The Y-man and Anne11 like this.
  14. Hockey Monkey

    Hockey Monkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    22nd Oct, 2015
    Posts:
    1,147
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Assuming a 50/50 split between the two holdings

    50% x 3% + 50% x 3% = 1.5% + 1.5% = 3%
     
    Redwing and Anne11 like this.
  15. twix11

    twix11 Member

    Joined:
    11th Oct, 2020
    Posts:
    16
    Location:
    sydney
    Tyvm this makes sense
     
  16. sfdoddsy

    sfdoddsy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    19th Mar, 2019
    Posts:
    347
    Location:
    Sydney
    The recommendation is based on diversification. Historically the entire sharemarket has returned 7-8% over the long term

    Some companies will return way more than 7%. More will return way less. I can't recall the exact figures, but it is something like 10% of companies are responsible for 90% of growth.

    So if you pick 'a few' companies you are betting you have picked the right ones. Vast amounts of research show that even the cleverest professional fund managers (over the long term) fail this test.

    Thus the recommendation is to not try and pick winners, but invest in the market as whole via indexed ETFs, LICs or managed funds.

    Some stock pickers get lucky. Most don't.

    If I wanted to base my financial future on luck I'd haunt casinos.

    I wish I'd listened to folk here and elsewhere and just chucked everything into VDHG (or equivalent) from the start. Instead I tried to be clever. I didn't lose money because I still chose diversified funds. But I was lucky and still didn't earn any more than I would have with plonking the lot into VDHG and ignoring it.
     
    Rambo, spoon, ASXGJ1 and 4 others like this.
  17. ASXGJ1

    ASXGJ1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    28th Jul, 2021
    Posts:
    686
    Location:
    NSW
    Really good article link about Aristocrat Analysis. Thank you. It would be good to get revised one on similar theme to see how many of those business continued paying dividend through Covid and can certainly considered as better stock to invest... IMO.

    WHF is in there but AFI and ARG is missing in the list which makes me wonder why people invest in LIC... !
     
  18. a’mare

    a’mare Member

    Joined:
    29th Jul, 2021
    Posts:
    9
    Location:
    Sydney
    Great post @twix11.

    I am also interested in passive approach to share investing.

    So far I have parked money in VDHG.

    @The Falcon

    any other suggestions for long term share investing. US and ASX based.
     
  19. SatayKing

    SatayKing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    20th Sep, 2017
    Posts:
    10,777
    Location:
    Extended Sabatical
    Why is that? What has happened in the next 20 years which makes you think that?

    Why is that? What has happened in the next 20 years which makes you think that?
     
  20. Ruby Tuesday

    Ruby Tuesday Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8th Mar, 2021
    Posts:
    1,485
    Location:
    Danistan
    Yield is a function of share price and earnings. For example take 2 insurance companies QBE and AUB 10 years ago both $10, both had dividend yields of 4.5%. QBE has had volatile but falling earnings, AUB has had steadily rising earnings, both have a yield of about 2% now. But AUB is a much more rewarding company as it gives a yield of 8% on purchase price while QBE Is less than 2%. AUB may well continue to yield less than QBE while making multiples more than QBE, QBE underwrites it doesnt know if what it is earning now will cost them money in five years. AUB just takes commisions, is growing acquiring new companies, just acquired a fintech, as premium rises organically makes more money. The capital growth of AUB is way more than QBE pays in dividends. There is an inverse relationship between yield and earnings, as earnings push up price, prices will follow earnings reducing current yield.
     
    ASXGJ1 likes this.