Borrowing to prepay interest?

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by chylld, 28th Feb, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. chylld

    chylld Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,701
    Location:
    Sydney
    Hi all,

    A friend has been advised by his accountant about the following strategy:

    All of the interest referred to is that incurred by investment loans. By "borrowing against the portfolio" isn't that using borrowed funds to pay interest on those or other investment borrowings, i.e. effectively capitalising interest? Is that allowed as it would result on interest on interest?

    If interest on interest is avoided by using a separate borrowing solely for prepaying interest (and paying off that borrowing's interest normally) what's the difference vs regularly paying interest out of an ordinary savings account?
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,927
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Yes this is capitalising interest.

    It can be deductible - the interest on interest in certain cases because someone may be getting a discount for prepaying yet not have enough cash to pay it so may need to borrow.

    Seek tax advice before trying this at home.

    Here is an old PBR
    RBA Content
    Note it doesn't consider the question - will Part IVA be applied to deny the deduciton.
     
    chylld and Craig Seddon like this.
  3. chylld

    chylld Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,701
    Location:
    Sydney
    Thanks Terry for finding such a relevant PBR.

    However it's still possible that an individual without cashflow problems (and could easily pay the interest normally) would be denied the deduction?
     
  4. Craig Seddon

    Craig Seddon Member

    Joined:
    25th Nov, 2016
    Posts:
    17
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    @chylld - I agree with Terry.

    With your follow up question, I believe that TD2012/1 may apply to deny the deduction. You definitely need to seek tax advice on the above!
     
    Perthguy, Terry_w and chylld like this.
  5. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,927
    Location:
    Australia wide
  6. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,629
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    avoid the use of "avoid" and you might have a chance

    ta

    rolf
     
  7. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,504
    Location:
    Sydney
    I read it differently.
    I read the advice is to using a LOC etc and prepay a years interest on the IP (or shares?). Then when CGT profits occur from shares the additional deduction for one offsets the extra income. The key problem with a prepaid interest strategy is that next year (2018 ?) the loan has no interest deduction unless the interest is prepaid thereafter.

    Part IVA would not apply to prepaid loan interest provided the period prepaid is one year. Banks generally only permit 12months to comply with ATO rules on prepaymnets anyway.
     
    Perthguy likes this.
  8. chylld

    chylld Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,701
    Location:
    Sydney
    Still trying to wrap my head around this... does that mean that there's no benefit until the shares are sold, and the CGT that would normally have resulted is offset?
     
  9. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,504
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yes. Extra income offset a enhanced deduction in year one. Key issue is how much tax does that save v's the next year effect. If say the taxpayer planned maternity leave in Y2 there could be a benefit in bringing forward the deduction from year two to year one. In year one a higher deduction that offset the gain and also in year two they then have +ve income taxed at low rates rather than neg gearing without income to offset it.
     
    Perthguy likes this.