Best way to structure % ownership for tax purposes

Discussion in 'Accounting & Tax' started by Rachel J, 15th Aug, 2019.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Rachel J

    Rachel J New Member

    Joined:
    15th Aug, 2019
    Posts:
    1
    Location:
    nsw
    Hi Everyone, My Husband and I are looking at purchasing our third investment property.In the past we have structured the ownership as 99%, my husband the sole income owner, and 1% myself,home duties. Just wondering if anyone had other ideas?? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.Thanks!
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,991
    Location:
    Australia wide
    Rachel J likes this.
  3. Scott No Mates

    Scott No Mates Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    27,248
    Location:
    Sydney or NSW or Australia
    It totally depends on your personal circumstances - what happens if you ever sell? Who will bear the 99% of CGT liability? Have you discussed this with your accountant & solicitor simultaneously as there are both legal and tax implications to be considered?
     
    Rachel J likes this.
  4. Peter_Tersteeg

    Peter_Tersteeg Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,171
    Location:
    03 9877 3000
    What tax outcome are you looking for?

    Ownership in the higher income earner's name will probably give them more tax deductions whilst the property is negatively geared. It will also mean they pay more tax at some future point if the property becomes positively geared, plus they'll probably pay more CGT when the property is sold. You'd need to get specific advice to model these 'tax' outcomes.

    From a lending perspective, there's no benefit to 1% ownership.
     
    Rachel J likes this.
  5. Paul@PAS

    Paul@PAS Tax, Accounting + SMSF + All things Property Tax Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    23,536
    Location:
    Sydney
    The 1% issue can be a benefit or not depending on a range of factors
    - May limit a spouse from later refinancing without your knowledge
    - May impact servicing (or not)
    - May affect land tax calculations !! ie If in spouse name only there may be a secondary threshold.
    - May affect tax outcomes eg losses may accumulate for the 1% inteerst. Return must still be lodged to carry this fwd etc
    - 1% may affect govt benefits and the 99% to spouse may affect adjusted taxable income used by Centrelink for Family Tax Benefits and other benefits

    Legal advice is the general approach to address ownership structure. Mortgage broker guidance and tax guidance may also assist.