Best IO rates

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by Burramys, 9th Jun, 2018.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Burramys

    Burramys Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,034
    Location:
    Melbourne
    A property has an IO mortgage with ANZ of 4.30%. Cashflow precludes P&I at present. I'm seeking a better rate. Most of the comparison and bank websites are not useful. State Custodians
    Compare Our Award Winning Home Loans - State Custodians
    may be an option. Can anyone suggest a better rate than 4.30%? TIA.
     
  2. mikey7

    mikey7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    30th Mar, 2016
    Posts:
    1,173
    Location:
    Sydney, Brisbane
    That's a pretty good rate.. I'm on 4.89%
     
    Shazi, Invest_noob and housechopper2 like this.
  3. Athikalaka

    Athikalaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    188
    Location:
    AU
    I'd be pretty happy with Inv IO var of 4.30%
    I've only seen competitive rates for Inv IO fixed: Best interest rates in the market atm!

    CBA told me they can drop IO 2 yr fixed if it's Interest in Advance for 3.99% or 4.09% for 3 yr fixed. If you want to do a split, I guess it can work well.
     
    housechopper2 likes this.
  4. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,653
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    If cash flow is tight the chance of being able to move to lender x might be very very limited.

    That's a very good invy rate with anz

    Ta

    Rolf
     
    Shazi likes this.
  5. tobe

    tobe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,814
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Lately Anz have been doing better. I got 1.7% off the last pricing I did with them. From memory total lending was close to a mil. Worthwhile asking for updated pricing from your broker or banker.
     
    Shazi, L3ha7 and Peter_Tersteeg like this.
  6. Burramys

    Burramys Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    26th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    2,034
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Thanks. Fixed has never worked out for me. Maybe split could work. Need to think about this. With nothing much better tehre's limited leverage to get ANZ to go lower.
     
  7. Peter_Tersteeg

    Peter_Tersteeg Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,171
    Location:
    03 9877 3000
    I've got 4.07% on my only remaining I/O loan. I cheated though. I fixed for 5 years a few years ago just as all the repricing was starting up. Historically I've had some wins and some losses with fixed rates. This one is definitely a serious win though!

    If I look at a cross section of lenders, variable I/O investment rates would be somewhere between 4.5% and 5.0% depending on the lender, loan amount, LVR. There are a couple of deals that are quite a bit lower if you've got the right mix of circumstances though.
     
  8. Eric Wu

    Eric Wu Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    8th Oct, 2016
    Posts:
    1,603
    Location:
    Australia
    got a 1.65% discount off SVR for under $500k loan last week. not bad outcome for client.
     
  9. L3ha7

    L3ha7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Apr, 2016
    Posts:
    858
    Location:
    Syd
    I should keep an eye out for some good deals then - queation-is it attractive for a bank if 1 wants to change the whole prop portfolio loans from 1 to another? (economy of scale helps to get bettdr rate or no?)
     
  10. Athikalaka

    Athikalaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    188
    Location:
    AU
    Somehow I was able to get 4.20% with my current lender. They were giving me Inv IO Var of 4.89% only 9 months ago. I switched to Inv P&I Var which brought me to 4.44% then 3 months ago I asked them if they could do a better rate as I was shopping around. They dropped me to 4.08% (Inv P&I Var) which I think is pretty great. I have an offset which is currently paying down the principal (I have no non-deductible debt) but I asked them if I wanted to flip back to Inv IO Var what could they give me. Apparently 4.20% and no re-assessment as I was previously IO within a year. A $200 fee to switch back.

    Now I'm deciding whether to go back to IO and focus on building my offset or continue paying down principal since it's a good rate. If I wanted to borrow again in the future, does more principal being paid down (less deductible debt) or more cash banked up give favourable results for borrowing power?
    @Redom I'm probably looking at you for those stats :)
     
  11. Redom

    Redom Mortgage Broker Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,658
    Location:
    Sydney (Australia Wide)
    Lower principle balance = better for borrowing power. Debt reduction helps borrowing power. Theoritically, reducing investment debt by $1 should increase investment borrowing by $1. This then gets ‘multiplied/extrapolated’ as the new investment debt generally means an income increase too (rental income).

    Having funds in offset doesn’t reduce debt limits, so it doesn’t improve borrowing power. It helps risk management, having access to funds and potentially providing larger deposits.
     
  12. Athikalaka

    Athikalaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    188
    Location:
    AU
    Thanks. So if my goal is to further my portfolio, start paying down investment debt but if I want to keep my options open, say, upgrading my PPOR, having a larger offset is clearly the better play. Decisions...the flexibility is always tempting. If rents continue to increase and if we picked a good area for capital growth then it would be a nice balance. Now where's my crystal ball...
     
  13. Peter_Tersteeg

    Peter_Tersteeg Mortgage Broker Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    8,171
    Location:
    03 9877 3000
    Another way to look at this is you could use $1 to pay off your loan, or put that $1 into your offset account. Either way you pay the same amount of interest, but putting the money into an offset account doesn't help your borrowing power.

    However the $1 in the offset account means that you have an extra $1 available for a deposit, so you don't need to borrow it. Effectively the equation is still a neutral one.

    Furthermore, if there is a set of circumstances where paying off the loan would be a better outcome than cash in the offset account, you can use the cash to pay off the loan at any time you like.

    The benefit of the offset account is that it gives you the options to make the decisions. That's not something you always have if you pay down debt. The down side of the offset account for some people is that they may be more tempted to spend the money frivolously rather than using it strategically.
     
    Burramys and Athikalaka like this.
  14. Redom

    Redom Mortgage Broker Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    4,658
    Location:
    Sydney (Australia Wide)
    This - if your disciliplined and it doesn't cost much (for an IO with offset) setup.

    You can 'increase' your borrowing power eventually anyway if you have large offset balances - the flexibility gives you options to pay down debt if you need to. You can choose to pay down the loan, adjust the limit down (i.e. actually pay the loan down) and then increase your borrowing power when you need to. This may mean you don't really need that crystal ball with the offset approach, once you have the information you need when your looking to buy, the offset approach gives you flexibility to make decisions.
     
    Burramys and Athikalaka like this.
  15. Athikalaka

    Athikalaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    188
    Location:
    AU
    Cheers @Peter_Tersteeg & @Redom
    I'm not too worried about temptation as we've been on top of our budgets. Now that APRA have made it difficult to refinance, I agree that having the options to pay down loans at my choosing is something I would prioritise, should more changes by the banks come in to play.

    The offset would only be for the rainy days or large deposits for PPOR. If for some reason, a few years down the track I don't have enough deposit for another investment and I want to make the purchase at that moment, I could pay down some principal to make up that shortfall. And instead of paying down principal for that particular loan/lender, I could choose to pay off a different IP principal if there's a good reason to (better borrowing power if I pay down more debt with a different lender?)
     
  16. Sonamic

    Sonamic Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    1,340
    Location:
    Sunny QLD
    Hi All, it's been a while.
    So is it more beneficial to reduce PPOR debt, or IP debt to increase borrowing power?
     
  17. Athikalaka

    Athikalaka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    1st Jan, 2016
    Posts:
    188
    Location:
    AU
    Always PPOR debt first because that's non-deductible. Noone is helping you pay that down.
     
  18. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,653
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    the higher one's taxable income is, the higher the benefit of killing off non ded debt.

    ta
    rolf
     
    Sonamic likes this.
  19. L3ha7

    L3ha7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    24th Apr, 2016
    Posts:
    858
    Location:
    Syd
    I/O fixed for 2 years at 4.19% - worth it ? or is there anything better available?
     
  20. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,653
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    4.09 with pricing at CBA as at yesty

    ta
    rolf