Available Equity Question

Discussion in 'Loans & Mortgage Brokers' started by baabo87, 20th Mar, 2017.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. baabo87

    baabo87 Member

    Joined:
    8th Jan, 2017
    Posts:
    9
    Location:
    VIC
    Hi all,

    Maybe someone can help me get my head around this - but I am a little confused around my equity.

    Currently, we have a property in Melbourne worth $825,000 (bank valuation) - which we owe $500,000. Available equity will then be 80% of $825k subtract $500k - which then leaves me with $160k of available equity.

    We are looking to purchase 2 x properties this year with 10% deposit for each to maximise the number of properties we can purchase with our existing equity of $160k.

    Property 1:
    Purchase Price Aim= $360k
    10% deposit= $36k
    90% loan= $324k
    6% buying cost (stamp duty plus extras)= $21.6k
    1.9% LMI= $6.84k

    This means from our $160k available equity in our home, we can pay the 10% deposit ($36k), 6% buying cost ($21.6k) and 1.9% LMI ($6.84k) from there which then leaves us with a remaining available equity of $95.6k.

    At this same time, now our $500k loan for our home has become a $564.44k loan.

    Then we purchase our Property 2:

    Purchase Price Aim: $460k
    10% deposit= $46k
    90% loan= $414k
    6% buying cost=$27.6k
    1.9% LMI = $8.74k

    This means from our remaining $95.6k equity in our home, we will have remaining $13.26k after spending $82.34k (10% deposit + 6% buying + 1.9% LMI).

    At the same time, now our $564.44k loan has become $646.78k loan which still brings us under 80% LVR on our $825k home.

    So now in summary, by the end of this year we should be in the following position:

    Home worth $825k with $646.78k loan (LVR 78%)
    Invest Prop 1 worth $360k with $324k loan (LVR 90%)
    Invest Prop 2 worth $460k with $414k loan (LVR 90%)
    Remaining Available Equity is $13.26k

    Does the above calculation seem correct???

    Then what confuses me is the following year in 2018, assuming all properties experienced a 3% capital growth, I calculate that my available equity reduces to a negative as shown below:

    Home is now worth $849.75k (3% increase) with $646.78 loan, which means there is an available equity of $33.02k

    Invest Prop 1 is now worth $370.8k with $324k loan, which means there is a NEGATIVE $27.36k equity.

    Investment Prop 2 is now worth $473.8k with $414k loan, which means there is a NEGATIVE $34.96k equity.

    If I sum the 3 x available equities above, I get that I now have a negative available equity balance of -$29.3k.

    My question is why has my available equity become not only smaller than the previous year, but negative. Should I have taken the negative available equities as zeros - thus making my available equity next year $33.02k?

    Haha Might be a real basic stupid question but it sure has me stumped at the moment of which is the correct way of calculating!!!

    Any feedback would be truely appreciated!

    KK
     
  2. Terry_w

    Terry_w Lawyer, Tax Adviser and Mortgage broker in Sydney Business Member

    Joined:
    18th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    41,917
    Location:
    Australia wide
    There are purchase costs of about 5% so it will take a while
     
  3. baabo87

    baabo87 Member

    Joined:
    8th Jan, 2017
    Posts:
    9
    Location:
    VIC
    Hello there,

    Yes I've considered the purchase costs to be 6% in all cases... So is the negative available equity correct or do I just ignore the negative ones and call them 'no available equity' on the investment properties and only take into consideration the $33k positive equity on our home...
     
  4. JasonC

    JasonC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Mar, 2017
    Posts:
    256
    Location:
    Sydney
    You are calculating your available equity assuming a 80% LVR loan but you are assuming you buy the two IPs with 90% LVR loans. There won't be any available equity (assuming 80% LVR) in the IPs until they have grown in value to componesate for the 90% loan as well as purchase costs.

    Regards,

    Jason
     
    Sonamic likes this.
  5. baabo87

    baabo87 Member

    Joined:
    8th Jan, 2017
    Posts:
    9
    Location:
    VIC
    Hi Jason,

    So yes, based on the fact that my two investment properties wont have any available equity next year, i basically only have the $33k available equity from my home is how Im understanding it. Correct?

    And in actual fact, as I have already paid LMI for the two investment properties, when I calculate my available equoty on these two I should actually only multiply by 0.9 then subtract the loan amount rather than 0.8 I think...
     
  6. baabo87

    baabo87 Member

    Joined:
    8th Jan, 2017
    Posts:
    9
    Location:
    VIC
    Which then (0.9 x $370k) - $324k = $9k available equity?
     
  7. JasonC

    JasonC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    14th Mar, 2017
    Posts:
    256
    Location:
    Sydney
    Baabo87,

    A question for your lender/broker - will the bank do cash out back up to 90% LMI? I wouldn't have thought that any banks would be too keen but something to check. When I calculate "available" equity I assume I can do cashout up to 80% LVR.

    Regards,

    Jason
     
  8. Rolf Latham

    Rolf Latham Inciteful (sic) Staff Member Business Plus Member

    Joined:
    14th Jun, 2015
    Posts:
    10,629
    Location:
    Gold Coast (Australia Wide)
    Theoretical available equity based on LVR minus available serviceabilty to extract the equity means zero available equity.

    An increasingly common post APRAnomics challenge

    ta

    rolf